StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Deployment
  4. Server Configuration And Automation
  5. AWS OpsWorks vs Selenium

AWS OpsWorks vs Selenium

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS OpsWorks
AWS OpsWorks
Stacks196
Followers222
Votes51
Selenium
Selenium
Stacks16.2K
Followers12.6K
Votes527
GitHub Stars33.6K
Forks8.6K

AWS OpsWorks vs Selenium: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: AWS OpsWorks is a configuration management service that uses Chef, while Selenium is primarily a testing tool for web applications. OpsWorks focuses on automating infrastructure provisioning, while Selenium automates web browser interactions for testing purposes. This difference in architecture and focus sets them apart in terms of their core functionalities.

  2. Use Case: AWS OpsWorks is commonly used for managing infrastructure and application deployments, especially in the cloud, whereas Selenium is preferred for automated testing of web applications. OpsWorks streamlines the process of configuring and managing servers, while Selenium provides robust capabilities for automating browser interactions and running tests on web applications.

  3. Integration: AWS OpsWorks integrates seamlessly with other AWS services like EC2, RDS, and S3 to provide a comprehensive solution for managing infrastructure, deployments, and scaling. On the other hand, Selenium integrates with popular programming languages like Java, Python, and C# along with various testing frameworks to facilitate automated testing of web applications across different browsers and platforms.

  4. Scalability: AWS OpsWorks offers automated scaling capabilities based on predefined configurations and triggers, allowing users to efficiently manage growth and fluctuations in resource demands. In contrast, Selenium's scalability depends on the test scripts developed by users and their ability to parallelize tests across multiple browser instances for faster execution.

  5. Pricing Model: AWS OpsWorks follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on the resources consumed, while Selenium is open-source and free to use, making it a cost-effective choice for organizations looking to implement automated testing without additional financial overhead. This difference in pricing models can influence decision-making when choosing between the two tools.

  6. Maintenance: AWS OpsWorks requires ongoing maintenance and monitoring to ensure the stability and efficiency of the infrastructure and application deployments managed through the service. In contrast, Selenium test scripts may require occasional updates to adapt to changes in web applications or browser versions but generally requires less maintenance compared to managing infrastructure configurations in OpsWorks.

In Summary, the key differences between AWS OpsWorks and Selenium lie in their architecture, use cases, integration options, scalability, pricing models, and maintenance requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on AWS OpsWorks, Selenium

Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

AWS OpsWorks
AWS OpsWorks
Selenium
Selenium

Start from templates for common technologies like Ruby, Node.JS, PHP, and Java, or build your own using Chef recipes to install software packages and perform any task that you can script. AWS OpsWorks can scale your application using automatic load-based or time-based scaling and maintain the health of your application by detecting failed instances and replacing them. You have full control of deployments and automation of each component

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

AWS OpsWorks lets you model the different components of your application as layers in a stack, and maps your logical architecture to a physical architecture. You can see all resources associated with your application, and their status, in one place.;AWS OpsWorks provides an event-driven configuration system with rich deployment tools that allow you to efficiently manage your applications over their lifetime, including support for customizable deployments, rollback, partial deployments, patch management, automatic instance scaling, and auto healing.;AWS OpsWorks lets you define template configurations for your entire environment in a format that you can maintain and version just like your application source code.;AWS OpsWorks supports any software that has a scripted installation. Because OpsWorks uses the Chef framework, you can bring your own recipes or leverage hundreds of community-built configurations.
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
33.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
8.6K
Stacks
196
Stacks
16.2K
Followers
222
Followers
12.6K
Votes
51
Votes
527
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 32
    Devops
  • 19
    Cloud management
Pros
  • 177
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
Cons
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers

What are some alternatives to AWS OpsWorks, Selenium?

Ansible

Ansible

Ansible is an IT automation tool. It can configure systems, deploy software, and orchestrate more advanced IT tasks such as continuous deployments or zero downtime rolling updates. Ansible’s goals are foremost those of simplicity and maximum ease of use.

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

Chef

Chef

Chef enables you to manage and scale cloud infrastructure with no downtime or interruptions. Freely move applications and configurations from one cloud to another. Chef is integrated with all major cloud providers including Amazon EC2, VMWare, IBM Smartcloud, Rackspace, OpenStack, Windows Azure, HP Cloud, Google Compute Engine, Joyent Cloud and others.

Terraform

Terraform

With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

Capistrano

Capistrano

Capistrano is a remote server automation tool. It supports the scripting and execution of arbitrary tasks, and includes a set of sane-default deployment workflows.

Puppet Labs

Puppet Labs

Puppet is an automated administrative engine for your Linux, Unix, and Windows systems and performs administrative tasks (such as adding users, installing packages, and updating server configurations) based on a centralized specification.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Salt

Salt

Salt is a new approach to infrastructure management. Easy enough to get running in minutes, scalable enough to manage tens of thousands of servers, and fast enough to communicate with them in seconds. Salt delivers a dynamic communication bus for infrastructures that can be used for orchestration, remote execution, configuration management and much more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana