StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Serverless
  4. Serverless Task Processing
  5. AWS Batch vs Spring Batch

AWS Batch vs Spring Batch

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

AWS Batch
AWS Batch
Stacks84
Followers251
Votes6
Spring Batch
Spring Batch
Stacks184
Followers250
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.9K
Forks2.5K

AWS Batch vs Spring Batch: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between AWS Batch and Spring Batch. Both AWS Batch and Spring Batch are frameworks used for processing large amounts of data, but they differ in various aspects.

  1. Service vs Framework: The first key difference between AWS Batch and Spring Batch lies in their nature. AWS Batch is a fully managed service provided by Amazon Web Services, offering automatic scaling and resource management, while Spring Batch is a lightweight framework built on top of the Spring ecosystem, which requires manual setup and configuration.

  2. Cloud vs On-Premise: Another fundamental difference is the deployment environment. AWS Batch runs in the cloud, allowing users to utilize the on-demand infrastructure provided by AWS, including EC2 instances and containerized environments. On the other hand, Spring Batch can be deployed on any on-premise infrastructure or in the cloud, giving more flexibility to the users.

  3. Scalability: AWS Batch provides automatic scalability, enabling users to easily handle large-scale data processing tasks. It dynamically scales resources based on the workload, reducing the need for manual intervention. Spring Batch, being a framework, requires users to set up their own scalability measures, which may involve manual adjustments or the use of additional tools.

  4. Cost: Cost is an important factor when considering AWS Batch and Spring Batch. AWS Batch is a managed service provided by AWS, and users pay for the resources they consume. It offers a pay-as-you-go model, which means the cost is directly related to the workload and the resources utilized. Spring Batch being an open-source framework, does not have any direct cost associated with it, apart from the infrastructure and resources used.

  5. Integration with other AWS Services: AWS Batch tightly integrates with other AWS services, such as Amazon S3 for storing input/output data, Amazon CloudWatch for monitoring, and AWS Identity and Access Management for security. This seamless integration simplifies the development and management process. Spring Batch, being a framework, provides integration options with various technologies, but the integration with AWS services requires additional configurations.

  6. Maturity and Ecosystem: AWS Batch is a mature service with a comprehensive ecosystem of other AWS offerings and community support. It benefits from regular updates, bug fixes, and feature enhancements driven by a large user base. Spring Batch, being an open-source framework, has an active community and regular updates but relies on the Spring ecosystem and the community for improvements and support.

In summary, AWS Batch is a fully managed service provided by AWS, offering automatic scalability, cloud deployment, and seamless integration with other AWS services. Spring Batch, on the other hand, is a lightweight framework that can be deployed in various environments, requires manual setup for scalability, and provides integration options with different technologies.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

AWS Batch
AWS Batch
Spring Batch
Spring Batch

It enables developers, scientists, and engineers to easily and efficiently run hundreds of thousands of batch computing jobs on AWS. It dynamically provisions the optimal quantity and type of compute resources (e.g., CPU or memory optimized instances) based on the volume and specific resource requirements of the batch jobs submitted.

It is designed to enable the development of robust batch applications vital for the daily operations of enterprise systems. It also provides reusable functions that are essential in processing large volumes of records, including logging/tracing, transaction management, job processing statistics, job restart, skip, and resource management.

-
Transaction management; Chunk based processing; Declarative I/O
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
2.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.5K
Stacks
84
Stacks
184
Followers
251
Followers
250
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Containerized
  • 3
    Scalable
Cons
  • 3
    More overhead than lambda
  • 1
    Image management
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
MongoDB
MongoDB

What are some alternatives to AWS Batch, Spring Batch?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase