AWS Amplify vs Beanstalk

Overview

Beanstalk

Stacks85

Followers270

Votes51

AWS Amplify

Stacks615

Followers552

Votes15

AWS Amplify vs Beanstalk: What are the differences?

AWS Amplify and Beanstalk are two popular services provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS). Both services are used for deploying and managing web applications. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Flexibility of Deployment Options: AWS Amplify provides a more streamlined and opinionated way of deploying web applications. It offers a simplified deployment process with built-in CI/CD capabilities. On the other hand, AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers more flexibility in deployment options, allowing you to choose between different programming languages, containers, and infrastructure configurations.
Managed vs Self-Managed Environment: AWS Amplify is a fully managed service, where AWS takes care of the infrastructure and resource management for you. It abstracts away the underlying infrastructure complexities, enabling developers to focus on building their applications. In contrast, AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers a self-managed environment where developers have more control over the infrastructure configuration and settings.
Scalability and Load Balancing: AWS Amplify automatically scales your web application based on demand using AWS AppSync or AWS Lambda, ensuring high availability and performance. Elastic Beanstalk also provides auto-scaling capabilities but gives you more control over the scaling policies. Additionally, it supports integrating with Elastic Load Balancing to distribute incoming traffic across multiple instances.
Integration with Backend Services: AWS Amplify is specifically designed for building full-stack serverless applications with a strong focus on frontend development. It provides seamless integration with AWS services like AWS AppSync, AWS Lambda, and Amazon DynamoDB, making it easier to establish the backend infrastructure. Conversely, Elastic Beanstalk can be used with a wide range of backend services, including traditional databases and message queuing systems.
Development Environment and Tooling: AWS Amplify offers a rich set of development tools and a command-line interface (CLI) that integrates well with popular frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular. It provides a local development environment that allows developers to test their applications locally before deploying to the cloud. Elastic Beanstalk also provides a CLI and supports different development environments, but it may require more manual configuration and setup.
Pricing and Cost Optimization: AWS Amplify follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model and offers a free tier which includes a certain level of usage for AWS services. It also provides cost optimization features like automatic pruning of resources based on usage patterns. Elastic Beanstalk also follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, but the cost optimization is more manual, requiring you to fine-tune the infrastructure and scaling settings to optimize costs.

In summary, AWS Amplify provides a more opinionated and streamlined deployment experience for building full-stack serverless applications, while Elastic Beanstalk offers more flexibility and control over the infrastructure configuration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Beanstalk	AWS Amplify
A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.	A JavaScript library for frontend and mobile developers building cloud-enabled applications. The library is a declarative interface across different categories of operations in order to make common tasks easier to add into your application. The default implementation works with Amazon Web Services (AWS) resources but is designed to be open and pluggable for usage with other cloud services that wish to provide an implementation or custom backends.
Setup and manage repositories- Import or create Subversion and Git repositories that are instantly available to your team.;Invite team members, partners & clients- Restrict access to certain repos and provide read-only or full read/write permissions.;Browse files and changes- Every version of every file you’ve committed to Beanstalk is just a click away. See a timeline of who made changes and view the differences between revisions. Syntax highlighting for over 70 languages.;Preview, Compare & Share- Instantly preview HTML and image files in Beanstalk, compare versions side by side, and share them with your team, colleagues or clients, even if they don’t have a Beanstalk account.;Code Editing- Make and commit changes directly in the web interface of Beanstalk.;Blame Tool- View the line-by-line history of every file using Beanstalk's blame tool. Quickly see who was responsible for each line of code and which revision it belonged to.;Instantly deploy static assets from Beanstalk to your development, staging and production servers via Amazon S3, Rackspace Cloud Files, Heroku, DreamObjects;	-
Statistics
Stacks 85	Stacks 615
Followers 270	Followers 552
Votes 51	Votes 15
Pros & Cons
Pros 14 Ftp deploy 9 Deployment 8 Easy to navigate 4 Integrations 4 Code Editing	Pros 5 GraphQL 3 Better with Relations and Security 2 Cheaper 2 Flexible Auth options 1 Config free environment variables Cons 2 Free tier is limited 1 Steep Learning Curve
Integrations
Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront Basecamp Campfire FogBugz Lighthouse Harvest Zendesk HipChat Bugify	JavaScript React Native React Amazon S3 Amazon API Gateway Amazon Cognito

What are some alternatives to Beanstalk, AWS Amplify?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

LocalStack

LocalStack provides an easy-to-use test/mocking framework for developing Cloud applications.

Related Comparisons

AWS Amplify vs Beanstalk: What are the differences?

Flexibility of Deployment Options: AWS Amplify provides a more streamlined and opinionated way of deploying web applications. It offers a simplified deployment process with built-in CI/CD capabilities. On the other hand, AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers more flexibility in deployment options, allowing you to choose between different programming languages, containers, and infrastructure configurations.
Managed vs Self-Managed Environment: AWS Amplify is a fully managed service, where AWS takes care of the infrastructure and resource management for you. It abstracts away the underlying infrastructure complexities, enabling developers to focus on building their applications. In contrast, AWS Elastic Beanstalk offers a self-managed environment where developers have more control over the infrastructure configuration and settings.
Scalability and Load Balancing: AWS Amplify automatically scales your web application based on demand using AWS AppSync or AWS Lambda, ensuring high availability and performance. Elastic Beanstalk also provides auto-scaling capabilities but gives you more control over the scaling policies. Additionally, it supports integrating with Elastic Load Balancing to distribute incoming traffic across multiple instances.
Integration with Backend Services: AWS Amplify is specifically designed for building full-stack serverless applications with a strong focus on frontend development. It provides seamless integration with AWS services like AWS AppSync, AWS Lambda, and Amazon DynamoDB, making it easier to establish the backend infrastructure. Conversely, Elastic Beanstalk can be used with a wide range of backend services, including traditional databases and message queuing systems.
Development Environment and Tooling: AWS Amplify offers a rich set of development tools and a command-line interface (CLI) that integrates well with popular frameworks like React, Vue, and Angular. It provides a local development environment that allows developers to test their applications locally before deploying to the cloud. Elastic Beanstalk also provides a CLI and supports different development environments, but it may require more manual configuration and setup.
Pricing and Cost Optimization: AWS Amplify follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model and offers a free tier which includes a certain level of usage for AWS services. It also provides cost optimization features like automatic pruning of resources based on usage patterns. Elastic Beanstalk also follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, but the cost optimization is more manual, requiring you to fine-tune the infrastructure and scaling settings to optimize costs.

AWS Amplify vs Beanstalk

Overview