StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. CSS Pre Processors Extensions
  5. Autoprefixer vs Less

Autoprefixer vs Less

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Less
Less
Stacks2.9K
Followers1.2K
Votes929
GitHub Stars17.0K
Forks3.4K
Autoprefixer
Autoprefixer
Stacks3.8K
Followers55
Votes0

Autoprefixer vs Less: What are the differences?

  1. Browser Compatibility: Autoprefixer automatically adds vendor prefixes to CSS properties based on the Can I Use database, ensuring better cross-browser compatibility. Less is a preprocessor that extends CSS with dynamic behavior but does not provide automatic vendor prefixing.
  2. Syntax: Autoprefixer works directly with CSS files and applies prefixing based on the existing CSS code. Less, on the other hand, introduces a completely new syntax and language that needs to be converted to CSS using a preprocessor.
  3. Browser-Specific Features: Autoprefixer focuses on adding prefixes for different browser implementations, enhancing support for cutting-edge CSS features. Less does not deal with browser-specific features but allows for more efficient and structured CSS development.
  4. Maintainability: Autoprefixer reduces the need to manually manage vendor prefixes, making maintenance easier and more streamlined. Less, while offering improved organization and readability, does not provide the same level of automated maintenance for vendor prefixing.
  5. Integration: Autoprefixer can easily be integrated into build processes or task runners like Grunt or Gulp to automate prefixing tasks. Less, specifically designed for precompiling CSS, requires a separate step in the development process to convert Less code into standard CSS.
  6. Community Support: Autoprefixer has a large community and active development, ensuring regular updates and compatibility with new CSS features and browser versions. Less also has a strong community but is more focused on enhancing the capabilities of CSS rather than prefixing.

In Summary, Autoprefixer automates vendor prefixing for enhanced browser compatibility, while Less extends CSS with dynamic behavior and improved maintainability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Less
Less
Autoprefixer
Autoprefixer

Less is a CSS pre-processor, meaning that it extends the CSS language, adding features that allow variables, mixins, functions and many other techniques that allow you to make CSS that is more maintainable, themable and extendable.

It is a CSS post processor. It combs through compiled CSS files to add or remove vendor prefixes like -webkit and -moz after checking the code.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
17.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
2.9K
Stacks
3.8K
Followers
1.2K
Followers
55
Votes
929
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 214
    Better than css
  • 177
    Variables
  • 141
    Mixins
  • 99
    Maintainable
  • 79
    Used by bootstrap
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Less, Autoprefixer?

Sass

Sass

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

Stylus

Stylus

Stylus is a revolutionary new language, providing an efficient, dynamic, and expressive way to generate CSS. Supporting both an indented syntax and regular CSS style.

PostCSS

PostCSS

PostCSS is a tool for transforming CSS with JS plugins. These plugins can support variables and mixins, transpile future CSS syntax, inline images, and more.

Bourbon

Bourbon

Bourbon is a library of pure sass mixins that are designed to be simple and easy to use. No configuration required. The mixins aim to be as vanilla as possible, meaning they should be as close to the original CSS syntax as possible.

Compass

Compass

The compass core framework is a design-agnostic framework that provides common code that would otherwise be duplicated across other frameworks and extensions.

CSS Modules

CSS Modules

It is a CSS file in which all class names and animation names are scoped locally by default. The key words here are scoped locally. With this, your CSS class names become similar to local variables in JavaScript. It goes into the compiler, and CSS comes out the other side.

astroturf

astroturf

It lets you write CSS in your JavaScript files without adding any runtime layer, and with your existing CSS processing pipeline.

PreCSS

PreCSS

It combines Sass-like syntactical sugar — like variables, conditionals, and iterators — with emerging CSS features — like logical and custom properties, media query ranges, and image sets.

Animate.css

Animate.css

It is a bunch of cool, fun, and cross-browser animations for you to use in your projects. Great for emphasis, home pages, sliders, and general just-add-water-awesomeness.

css-loader

css-loader

The css-loader interprets @import and url() like import/require() and will resolve them.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase