StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Mvc Frameworks
  5. Aurelia vs Svelte

Aurelia vs Svelte

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Aurelia
Aurelia
Stacks276
Followers294
Votes374
GitHub Stars11.7K
Forks613
Svelte
Svelte
Stacks1.7K
Followers1.6K
Votes502
GitHub Stars84.6K
Forks4.7K

Aurelia vs Svelte: What are the differences?

Introduction

When it comes to front-end development, Aurelia and Svelte are both popular choices among developers. However, there are key differences between the two that can influence a developer's choice when deciding on a framework to use.

  1. Language Choice: One key difference between Aurelia and Svelte is the programming languages they use. Aurelia is written in ECMAScript 6 (ES6) and TypeScript, while Svelte is written in a language called Svelte, which is then compiled to highly efficient JavaScript code during build time.

  2. Approach to DOM Updates: Aurelia follows a reactive approach to updating the DOM, where changes trigger updates to the UI. In contrast, Svelte takes a compile-time approach, where the framework compiles the code to optimized JavaScript that updates the DOM directly rather than through a virtual DOM.

  3. Bundle Size: Svelte shines in terms of bundle size compared to Aurelia. Svelte's compiler optimizes and removes unnecessary code during the build process, resulting in smaller bundle sizes and improved performance.

  4. Learning Curve: Aurelia has a steeper learning curve compared to Svelte. Svelte's simplicity and intuitive syntax make it easier for developers to pick up and start building applications quickly.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Aurelia has a mature community and ecosystem, while Svelte's community is relatively new but rapidly growing. Developers might find more resources and plugins available for Aurelia, while Svelte's ecosystem is expanding with time.

  6. Reactivity: While both Aurelia and Svelte support reactivity, Svelte offers a more efficient way of handling reactivity through its reactive declarations and functions, resulting in better performance in complex applications.

In Summary, Aurelia and Svelte differ in their language choice, approach to DOM updates, bundle size, learning curve, community and ecosystem, and reactivity handling.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Aurelia, Svelte

Máté
Máté

Senior developer at Self-employed

May 28, 2020

Decided

Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.

311k views311k
Comments
Alex
Alex

Full-stack software engineer

Apr 25, 2020

Decided

Svelte 3 is exacly what I'm looking for that Vue is not made for.

It has a iterable dom just like angular but very low overhead.

This is going to be used with the application.

for old/ lite devices . ie.

  • android tv,
  • micro linux,
  • possibly text based web browser for ascci and/or linux framebuffer
  • android go devices
  • android One devices
125k views125k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Aurelia
Aurelia
Svelte
Svelte

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Two-Way Databinding;Routing & UI Composition;Extensible HTML;MV* with Conventions;Broad Language Support;Testable
Write less code; No virtual DOM; Truly reactive
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.7K
GitHub Stars
84.6K
GitHub Forks
613
GitHub Forks
4.7K
Stacks
276
Stacks
1.7K
Followers
294
Followers
1.6K
Votes
374
Votes
502
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 47
    Simple with conventions
  • 42
    Modern architecture
  • 39
    Makes sense and is mostly javascript not framework
  • 31
    Extensible
  • 28
    Integrates well with other components
Pros
  • 59
    Performance
  • 41
    Reactivity
  • 36
    Components
  • 35
    Simplicity
  • 34
    Javascript compiler (do that browsers don't have to)
Cons
  • 3
    Event Listener Overload
  • 2
    Complex
  • 2
    Learning Curve
  • 2
    Hard to learn
  • 2
    Little to no libraries

What are some alternatives to Aurelia, Svelte?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase