StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Aurelia vs React

Aurelia vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Aurelia
Aurelia
Stacks276
Followers294
Votes374
GitHub Stars11.7K
Forks613

Aurelia vs React: What are the differences?

Introduction

React and Aurelia are both popular JavaScript frameworks used for building modern web applications. While they share some similarities, there are several key differences that set them apart. Below are the key differences between Aurelia and React.

  1. Language and Syntax: Aurelia is written in TypeScript, a superset of JavaScript, while React is written in JavaScript. This means that Aurelia provides a typing system and additional language features, giving developers more control and flexibility in writing their code. On the other hand, React is purely JavaScript, which may be more familiar for developers already comfortable with the language.

  2. Architecture and Component Model: Aurelia follows the convention-over-configuration principle, providing a more opinionated and structured framework. It has a modular architecture that emphasizes the separation of concerns, making it easier to navigate and maintain large-scale applications. React, on the other hand, is more lightweight and flexible, giving developers more freedom in choosing their preferred architecture and component model. It follows a component-based approach where components can be composed to build complex user interfaces.

  3. Learning Curve and Documentation: Aurelia has a steeper learning curve compared to React. It has a broader set of concepts and features that developers need to understand to effectively build applications. Additionally, Aurelia has less extensive documentation and a smaller community compared to React, which might make it more challenging to find resources and community support for troubleshooting and learning.

  4. Workflow and Tooling: React has a more mature ecosystem and tooling support compared to Aurelia. It has a wide range of community-supported tools and libraries, such as Redux for state management, React Router for routing, and Next.js for server-side rendering. This gives developers more options and flexibility when it comes to choosing the tools and workflows that best suit their needs. Aurelia, while still being actively developed and maintained, may have a smaller selection of tools and libraries available.

  5. Performance and Rendering: React is known for its highly efficient virtual DOM rendering and diffing algorithm, which helps minimize the number of updates needed to the actual DOM. This makes React highly performant, especially when dealing with large and complex user interfaces. Aurelia, on the other hand, relies on a more traditional two-way data binding approach, which may not be as performant in certain scenarios.

In summary, Aurelia and React differ in terms of the language and syntax they are written in, their architecture and component models, the learning curve and documentation available, the workflow and tooling support, as well as their performance and rendering approaches. Developers should consider their specific needs and preferences when choosing between these frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Aurelia

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Aurelia
Aurelia

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Two-Way Databinding;Routing & UI Composition;Extensible HTML;MV* with Conventions;Broad Language Support;Testable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
11.7K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
613
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
276
Followers
147.0K
Followers
294
Votes
4.1K
Votes
374
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 47
    Simple with conventions
  • 42
    Modern architecture
  • 39
    Makes sense and is mostly javascript not framework
  • 31
    Extensible
  • 28
    Integrates well with other components

What are some alternatives to React, Aurelia?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase