Aurelia vs jsf

Overview

Aurelia

Stacks276

Followers294

Votes374

GitHub Stars11.7K

Forks613

JSF

Stacks138

Followers223

Votes4

Aurelia vs jsf: What are the differences?

Developers describe Aurelia as "Next gen JS framework written with ES6 and ES7. Integrates with Web Components. No external dependencies except polyfills". Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity. On the other hand, jsf is detailed as "It is use for building component-based web interfaces". It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community.

Aurelia and jsf can be primarily classified as "Javascript MVC Frameworks" tools.

Aurelia is an open source tool with 11.1K GitHub stars and 667 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Aurelia's open source repository on GitHub.

NOD studios, MMG, and Strengthen are some of the popular companies that use Aurelia, whereas jsf is used by GameDuell, Universidade CEUMA, and Maps S.A.. Aurelia has a broader approval, being mentioned in 25 company stacks & 142 developers stacks; compared to jsf, which is listed in 11 company stacks and 15 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Aurelia	JSF
Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.	It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community
Two-Way Databinding;Routing & UI Composition;Extensible HTML;MV* with Conventions;Broad Language Support;Testable	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 11.7K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 613	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 276	Stacks 138
Followers 294	Followers 223
Votes 374	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 47 Simple with conventions 42 Modern architecture 39 Makes sense and is mostly javascript not framework 31 Extensible 28 Integrates well with other components	Pros 2 Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle 1 Server Side component 1 Very Mature UI framework
Integrations
No integrations available	Java Java EE

What are some alternatives to Aurelia, JSF?

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Mithril

Mithril is around 12kb gzipped thanks to its small, focused, API. It provides a templating engine with a virtual DOM diff implementation for performant rendering, utilities for high-level modelling via functional composition, as well as support for routing and componentization.

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

Marionette

It is a JavaScript library with a RESTful JSON interface and is based on the Model–view–presenter application design paradigm. Backbone is known for being lightweight, as its only hard dependency is on one JavaScript library, Underscore.js, plus jQuery for use of the full library.

Ampersand.js

We <3 Backbone.js at &yet. It’s brilliantly simple and solves many common problems in developing clientside applications. But we missed the focused simplicity of tiny modules in node-land. We wanted something similar in style and philosophy, but that fully embraced tiny modules, npm, and browserify. Ampersand.js is a well-defined approach to combining (get it?) a series of intentionally tiny modules.

Durandal

Durandal is a cross-device, cross-platform client framework written in JS and designed to make Single Page Applications (SPAs) easy to create and maintain.