Atom vs GitKraken

Overview

Atom

Stacks16.9K

Followers14.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars60.8K

Forks17.3K

GitKraken

Stacks725

Followers909

Votes290

Atom vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Atom and GitKraken are both popular tools used by developers for coding and version control. However, they have key differences that set them apart in terms of functionality and usability.

User Interface: Atom focuses on simplicity and customization, allowing users to personalize their workspace with a wide range of themes and packages. GitKraken, on the other hand, prioritizes visual representation of the repository history and the Git workflow, making it easier for users to understand and manage their projects through a visual interface.
Version Control Integration: Atom provides basic Git integration through packages, requiring users to install additional plugins to utilize version control features fully. In contrast, GitKraken is primarily designed for Git version control, offering a seamless and comprehensive integration that streamlines the entire version control process within the application.
Collaboration Tools: GitKraken offers collaborative features such as code reviews, pull requests, and commenting directly within the platform, facilitating team collaboration and communication. Atom, while supporting collaborative plugins, doesn't have built-in tools for in-app collaboration, making it less suitable for extensive team-based projects.
Performance and Resource Usage: Atom is known for being lightweight and efficient in terms of performance and resource usage, making it ideal for developers working on older or less powerful systems. GitKraken, due to its visual-heavy interface and advanced features, can be more resource-intensive, requiring a relatively higher performance system to run smoothly.
Cost: Atom is an open-source text editor that is free to use for all users, with the option of contributing to its development or creating custom plugins. GitKraken, while offering a free version for personal use, also has premium plans with additional features for professional users or larger teams, making it a more viable option for enterprise-level projects with specific requirements.
Platform Compatibility: Atom is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring cross-platform compatibility for developers working on different operating systems. GitKraken, while also supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux, offers additional support for integration with cloud services like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, enhancing its versatility in managing remote repositories and collaborations.

In Summary, Atom and GitKraken differ in their user interface, version control integration, collaboration tools, performance, cost, and platform compatibility, catering to distinct preferences and requirements of developers and teams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Atom, GitKraken

Andrey

Managing Partner at WhiteLabelDevelopers

May 18, 2020

Decided

Since communication with Github is not necessary, the Atom is less convenient in working with text and code. Sublim's support and understanding of projects is best for us. Notepad for us is a completely outdated solution with an unacceptable interface. We use a good theme for Sublim ayu-dark

539k views539k

Comments

René

Sr. Financial Analyst

Aug 21, 2020

Review

I have used and like them both... here's my take on what to use in your case.

Use whatever software your instructor is using when learning a language. It makes it simpler to start. Then change to whatever you like.
Use an IDE (Integrated Development Enviroment). For Java I'd pick InteliJ (because I have found the Jetbrains IDEs great) or Visual Studio as a second pick (because it's free for individual coders).
Pick your text editor: the Atom vs Notepad++, vs others question Both Atom and Notepad++ offer many features and add-ons, making it a long-disputed competition. This is what drives to chose between one and the other, and I have been alternating: On Atom: The good:

Good looking coding environment
Good autocomplete
Project focused structure to your files The bad:
Higher system resources usage
Slower loading time (if you are opening and closing)

Notepad++ The good:

Very light system resources use
Fast and simple, with decent code higlighting
Loads very fast The bad:
Not as pretty as Atom
Autocomplete and syntax checking is not that good
File-focused editing

494 views494

Comments

Shail

None at None

Oct 19, 2020

Review

Hi, I have used PyCharm, Sublime Text and Atom. PyCharm is very heavy and it contains many extra functions which have not any use for beginner. Atom has slow startup but after that is runs smoothly but not recommended for weak hardware. Atom has great community and bunch plugin support. You can manually install plugins in atom with you need. Sublime Text is really very fast and I think it can smoothly run on weak hardware. I personally using Atom on one computer and VScode on other computer both are great but VScode has better startup time.

At end IDE is not going to make you a pro. When I was beginner I used notepad and then Atom for working fast. I used a simple text editor named MousePad for many months because I got syntax highlighting for mine very weak PC.

461 views461

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Atom	GitKraken
At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.	The downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free.
Atom is a desktop application based on web technologies;Node.js integration;Modular Design- composed of over 50 open-source packages that integrate around a minimal core;File system browser;Fuzzy finder for quickly opening files;Fast project-wide search and replace;Multiple cursors and selections;Multiple panes;Snippets;Code folding;A clean preferences UI;Import TextMate grammars and themes	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 60.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 17.3K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 16.9K	Stacks 725
Followers 14.5K	Followers 909
Votes 2.5K	Votes 290
Pros & Cons
Pros 529 Free 449 Open source 343 Modular design 321 Hackable 316 Beautiful UI Cons 19 Slow with large files 7 Slow startup 2 Most of the time packages are hard to find. 1 Can be easily Modified 1 No longer maintained	Pros 60 Dark theme 34 Best linux git client 29 Great overview 21 Gitflow support 21 Full featured client Cons 4 Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree) 4 No edit/fixup in interactive rebase 4 Extremely slow when working with large repositories 3 Does not work like a Mac app 3 Do not allow to directly edit staging area
Integrations
GitHub	Git

What are some alternatives to Atom, GitKraken?

Sublime Text

Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

SourceTree

Use the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface.

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

Fork

Manage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly.

Tower

Use all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive.

Related Comparisons

Atom vs GitKraken: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Atom and GitKraken are both popular tools used by developers for coding and version control. However, they have key differences that set them apart in terms of functionality and usability.

User Interface: Atom focuses on simplicity and customization, allowing users to personalize their workspace with a wide range of themes and packages. GitKraken, on the other hand, prioritizes visual representation of the repository history and the Git workflow, making it easier for users to understand and manage their projects through a visual interface.
Version Control Integration: Atom provides basic Git integration through packages, requiring users to install additional plugins to utilize version control features fully. In contrast, GitKraken is primarily designed for Git version control, offering a seamless and comprehensive integration that streamlines the entire version control process within the application.
Collaboration Tools: GitKraken offers collaborative features such as code reviews, pull requests, and commenting directly within the platform, facilitating team collaboration and communication. Atom, while supporting collaborative plugins, doesn't have built-in tools for in-app collaboration, making it less suitable for extensive team-based projects.
Performance and Resource Usage: Atom is known for being lightweight and efficient in terms of performance and resource usage, making it ideal for developers working on older or less powerful systems. GitKraken, due to its visual-heavy interface and advanced features, can be more resource-intensive, requiring a relatively higher performance system to run smoothly.
Cost: Atom is an open-source text editor that is free to use for all users, with the option of contributing to its development or creating custom plugins. GitKraken, while offering a free version for personal use, also has premium plans with additional features for professional users or larger teams, making it a more viable option for enterprise-level projects with specific requirements.
Platform Compatibility: Atom is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring cross-platform compatibility for developers working on different operating systems. GitKraken, while also supporting Windows, macOS, and Linux, offers additional support for integration with cloud services like GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, enhancing its versatility in managing remote repositories and collaborations.

Atom vs GitKraken

Overview