StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Atmosphere vs Aura

Atmosphere vs Aura

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Atmosphere
Atmosphere
Stacks9
Followers20
Votes10
GitHub Stars3.7K
Forks754
Aura
Aura
Stacks53
Followers56
Votes1
GitHub Stars2.9K
Forks255

Atmosphere vs Aura: What are the differences?

Introduction

Atmosphere and Aura are both frameworks used for building real-time web applications. However, there are key differences between the two that set them apart from each other.

  1. Messaging Protocol: Atmosphere uses WebSocket as its default messaging protocol, providing full-duplex communication between the client and the server. On the other hand, Aura utilizes the Bayeux protocol, which is built on top of WebSocket and provides publish-subscribe messaging capabilities.

  2. Compatibility: Atmosphere is compatible with a wide range of web containers, such as Tomcat, Jetty, and GlassFish, allowing developers to choose the one that best suits their needs. Aura, on the other hand, is specifically designed for use with the Salesforce platform, making it the preferred choice for building real-time applications within the Salesforce ecosystem.

  3. Scalability: Atmosphere is known for its high scalability, as it can handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. It achieves this through its support for clustering and load balancing. On the other hand, Aura provides built-in scalability features that are tailored to Salesforce’s infrastructure and automatically handle the distribution of application instances across multiple servers.

  4. Client-Side Development: Atmosphere provides a JavaScript library that allows developers to interact with the Atmosphere server from the client-side. This library offers various features, such as subscribing to server-side events and sending messages. In contrast, Aura provides a comprehensive client-side framework called "Lightning Components" that enables developers to build rich, responsive, and reusable components for Salesforce applications.

  5. Integration with Salesforce Platform: One of the major differences between Atmosphere and Aura is their integration with the Salesforce platform. Aura is specifically designed to seamlessly integrate with Salesforce, allowing developers to leverage Salesforce's data model, user interface components, and security features. Atmosphere, on the other hand, is a more general-purpose framework that can be integrated with various platforms, including Salesforce, but doesn't offer the same level of integration and pre-built functionality as Aura.

  6. Community and Support: Aura has a robust community and a dedicated support team, as it is an official Salesforce product. Users can access extensive documentation, forums, and various resources provided by Salesforce to assist with development using Aura. Atmosphere, being an open-source project, also has an active community that offers support and maintains the project. However, the level of support and resources available may not be as extensive as those provided by Salesforce for Aura.

In summary, Atmosphere and Aura differ in terms of messaging protocol, compatibility, scalability, client-side development, integration with Salesforce, and community support. Atmosphere is a versatile framework that can be used with multiple platforms, while Aura is specifically designed for building real-time applications within the Salesforce ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Atmosphere
Atmosphere
Aura
Aura

The Atmosphere Framework contains client and server side components for building Asynchronous Web Applications. The majority of popular frameworks are either supporting Atmosphere or supported natively by the framework. The Atmosphere Framework supports all major Browsers and Servers.

The Aura project centers around a collection of high-quality, well-tested, semantically versioned, standards-compliant, independent library packages that can be used in any codebase.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.7K
GitHub Stars
2.9K
GitHub Forks
754
GitHub Forks
255
Stacks
9
Stacks
53
Followers
20
Followers
56
Votes
10
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Cross-Browse
  • 3
    JVM
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    WebSockets
Pros
  • 1
    Open source
Integrations
Java
Java
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Atmosphere, Aura?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase