Atlassian Stash vs Bitbucket

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Atlassian Stash

Stacks76

Followers77

Votes0

Atlassian Stash vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Atlassian Stash and Bitbucket are both version control repositories that are widely used in software development projects. They offer similar functionalities but have several key differences that set them apart.

Hosting options: One of the key differences between Atlassian Stash and Bitbucket is the hosting options they offer. Stash can only be hosted on-premises, meaning it requires a dedicated server within the organization's infrastructure. On the other hand, Bitbucket offers both on-premises and cloud-based hosting options, providing more flexibility for users.
Scalability: Scalability is another significant difference between Stash and Bitbucket. Stash is known for its limited scalability as it relies on the hardware resources available on the on-premises server. In contrast, Bitbucket is designed to scale effortlessly in the cloud, allowing teams to handle increasing workloads and accommodate rapid growth.
Integration with Atlassian products: As both Stash and Bitbucket are developed by Atlassian, they integrate seamlessly with other Atlassian products. However, Bitbucket offers deeper integrations with a broader range of Atlassian tools, such as Jira, Bamboo, and Confluence. This integration allows for better visibility, collaboration, and traceability across the development lifecycle.
Pricing models: Pricing is an essential consideration for organizations when choosing between Stash and Bitbucket. Stash follows a traditional perpetual licensing model, where users pay upfront for the software licenses. In contrast, Bitbucket has a subscription-based pricing model, which allows users to pay on a monthly or yearly basis. This difference in pricing models allows organizations to choose the option that suits their budget and scalability requirements.
Code review capabilities: Both Stash and Bitbucket offer code review functionality, but there are some differences in their approach. Stash provides a more traditional code review process, where reviewers need to approve or reject changesets. Bitbucket, on the other hand, offers a more collaborative and flexible code review process, allowing reviewers to provide inline comments and suggestions directly on the code.
Third-party integrations: While both Stash and Bitbucket support integrations with various third-party tools, Bitbucket has a more extensive ecosystem of integrations. Bitbucket Marketplace offers a wide range of plugins and extensions that users can utilize to enhance their development workflow. Stash, although it supports some third-party integrations, has a more limited selection.

In summary, the key differences between Atlassian Stash and Bitbucket lie in hosting options, scalability, integration with Atlassian products, pricing models, code review capabilities, and third-party integrations. Bitbucket offers more flexibility, scalability, and extensive integrations, making it a preferred choice for many organizations.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Atlassian Stash

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Atlassian Stash
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	It is a centralized solution to manage Git repositories behind the firewall. Streamlined for small agile teams, powerful enough for large organizations.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Centralized solution to manage Git repositories ;Streamlined for small agile teams;Powerful enough for large organizations
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 76
Followers 33.4K	Followers 77
Votes 2.8K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Git Jira OpenLDAP Bamboo

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Atlassian Stash?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Related Comparisons

Atlassian Stash vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Hosting options: One of the key differences between Atlassian Stash and Bitbucket is the hosting options they offer. Stash can only be hosted on-premises, meaning it requires a dedicated server within the organization's infrastructure. On the other hand, Bitbucket offers both on-premises and cloud-based hosting options, providing more flexibility for users.
Scalability: Scalability is another significant difference between Stash and Bitbucket. Stash is known for its limited scalability as it relies on the hardware resources available on the on-premises server. In contrast, Bitbucket is designed to scale effortlessly in the cloud, allowing teams to handle increasing workloads and accommodate rapid growth.
Integration with Atlassian products: As both Stash and Bitbucket are developed by Atlassian, they integrate seamlessly with other Atlassian products. However, Bitbucket offers deeper integrations with a broader range of Atlassian tools, such as Jira, Bamboo, and Confluence. This integration allows for better visibility, collaboration, and traceability across the development lifecycle.
Pricing models: Pricing is an essential consideration for organizations when choosing between Stash and Bitbucket. Stash follows a traditional perpetual licensing model, where users pay upfront for the software licenses. In contrast, Bitbucket has a subscription-based pricing model, which allows users to pay on a monthly or yearly basis. This difference in pricing models allows organizations to choose the option that suits their budget and scalability requirements.
Code review capabilities: Both Stash and Bitbucket offer code review functionality, but there are some differences in their approach. Stash provides a more traditional code review process, where reviewers need to approve or reject changesets. Bitbucket, on the other hand, offers a more collaborative and flexible code review process, allowing reviewers to provide inline comments and suggestions directly on the code.
Third-party integrations: While both Stash and Bitbucket support integrations with various third-party tools, Bitbucket has a more extensive ecosystem of integrations. Bitbucket Marketplace offers a wide range of plugins and extensions that users can utilize to enhance their development workflow. Stash, although it supports some third-party integrations, has a more limited selection.

Atlassian Stash vs Bitbucket

Overview