StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Django Channels vs asyncio

Django Channels vs asyncio

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

asyncio
asyncio
Stacks126
Followers158
Votes13
Django Channels
Django Channels
Stacks100
Followers130
Votes1
GitHub Stars6.3K
Forks816

Django Channels vs asyncio: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Django Channels and asyncio

Django Channels and asyncio are both frameworks used for building asynchronous web applications. However, there are several key differences between the two:

1. Performance: Django Channels is built on top of asyncio and provides a higher level of abstraction for building asynchronous applications. It includes additional features like WebSocket support, message handling, and task scheduling. In contrast, asyncio is a lower-level library that provides the building blocks for building highly scalable and performant applications.

2. Compatibility: Django Channels is specifically designed to work with Django, a high-level Python web framework. It integrates seamlessly with the Django ORM, authentication system, and other Django features. On the other hand, asyncio is a standalone library that can be used with any Python framework or application.

3. Ease of Use: Django Channels simplifies the process of building asynchronous applications by providing a higher level of abstraction. It handles many of the complexities of asynchronous programming, allowing developers to focus on their application logic. On the other hand, asyncio requires a deeper understanding of asynchronous programming concepts and the underlying event loop.

4. WebSocket Support: Django Channels includes built-in support for WebSockets, allowing bidirectional communication between the server and client. It provides a simple and intuitive API for handling WebSocket connections and managing messages. In contrast, asyncio does not provide WebSocket support out of the box and requires additional libraries or code to implement it.

5. Message Handling: Django Channels includes a message handling framework that allows developers to define how messages are processed and routed within their application. It provides a flexible and extensible architecture for handling different types of messages. asyncio does not have a built-in message handling framework and requires developers to implement their own logic for message processing.

6. Task Scheduling: Django Channels includes a task scheduling system that allows developers to schedule tasks to run at specific times or intervals. It provides a convenient way to execute background jobs and perform periodic tasks. asyncio does not include a built-in task scheduling system and requires the use of external libraries or custom code for task scheduling.

In summary, Django Channels provides a higher level of abstraction, WebSocket support, message handling framework, task scheduling, and seamless integration with the Django web framework. On the other hand, asyncio is a lower-level library that provides the building blocks for building highly scalable and performant asynchronous applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

asyncio
asyncio
Django Channels
Django Channels

This module provides infrastructure for writing single-threaded concurrent code using coroutines, multiplexing I/O access over sockets and other resources, running network clients and servers, and other related primitives.

It does this by taking the core of Django and adding a fully asynchronous layer underneath, running Django itself in a synchronous mode but handling connections and sockets asynchronously, and giving you the choice to write in either style.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.3K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
816
Stacks
126
Stacks
100
Followers
158
Followers
130
Votes
13
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Cooperative Multitasking
  • 4
    I/O Wait
  • 3
    Network Call
  • 2
    I/O bound computation
Pros
  • 1
    Open source

What are some alternatives to asyncio, Django Channels?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase