StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. ASP.NET vs React

ASP.NET vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
Stacks31.3K
Followers11.8K
Votes40

ASP.NET vs React: What are the differences?

Key Differences Between ASP.NET and React

ASP.NET and React are two popular frameworks used in web development, but they have distinct differences in terms of architecture, language, and functionality. The key differences between ASP.NET and React are as follows:

1. Language: ASP.NET is primarily based on C# language, while React is based on JavaScript. C# is a statically typed language, whereas JavaScript is dynamically typed. This difference in language affects the code structure and syntax used in both frameworks.

2. Architecture: ASP.NET follows a server-side architecture, where the majority of the processing happens on the server. It relies on a full-page reload for each request, leading to slower page load times. On the other hand, React is a client-side framework that uses a virtual DOM to update only the necessary parts of a page, resulting in faster and more responsive user interfaces.

3. Rendering: ASP.NET uses server-side rendering (SSR) by default, which means that the HTML content is generated on the server and delivered to the client. This approach simplifies initial page load and provides better SEO support. React, on the other hand, primarily uses client-side rendering (CSR), where the HTML content is generated on the client side after JavaScript execution. CSR allows for more interactivity and dynamic content updates.

4. Component-based vs. Page-based: ASP.NET follows a page-based architecture, where each web page is represented by a separate file. Components in ASP.NET are typically predefined controls that can be placed within a page. In contrast, React follows a component-based architecture, where the user interface is broken down into small, reusable components. This modularity allows for better code organization, reusability, and easier maintenance.

5. Learning Curve: ASP.NET is a comprehensive framework that includes a wide range of tools and features, making it more complex and requiring a steeper learning curve. React, on the other hand, is a lightweight library that focuses solely on the user interface, making it easier to learn and implement, especially for developers with a JavaScript background.

6. Community and Ecosystem: ASP.NET has been around for a longer time, and as a result, it has a larger community and a mature ecosystem. There are a vast number of resources, libraries, and plugins available for ASP.NET development. React, although relatively newer, has gained tremendous popularity and has a rapidly growing community with a vibrant ecosystem of libraries and tools.

In summary, ASP.NET and React differ in terms of language, architecture, rendering, component-based approach, learning curve, and community support. Understanding these key differences is crucial in choosing the right framework for specific web development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, ASP.NET

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Damiano
Damiano

Oct 27, 2019

Decided

Preact offers an API which is extremely similar to React's for less than 10% of its size (and createElement is renamed to h, which makes the overall bundle a lot smaller). Although it is less compatible with other libraries than the latter (and its ecosystem is nowhere as developed), this is generally not a problem as Preact exposes the preact/compat API, which can be used as an alias both for React and ReactDOM and allows for the use of libraries which would otherwise just be compatible with React.

25.6k views25.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
ASP.NET
ASP.NET

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

.NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
31.3K
Followers
147.0K
Followers
11.8K
Votes
4.1K
Votes
40
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 21
    Great mvc
  • 13
    Easy to learn
  • 6
    C#
Cons
  • 2
    Entity framework is very slow
  • 1
    Not highly flexible for advance Developers
  • 1
    C#

What are some alternatives to React, ASP.NET?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase