Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

ASP.NET

28.6K
11.6K
+ 1
40
Next.js

6.8K
4.9K
+ 1
326
Add tool

ASP.NET vs Next.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

ASP.NET and Next.js are both popular web development frameworks used for creating dynamic and interactive web applications. While ASP.NET is a framework developed by Microsoft, Next.js is a React-based framework primarily used for building modern web applications. Despite sharing some similarities, there are key differences between ASP.NET and Next.js that developers should be aware of.

  1. Language Compatibility: ASP.NET primarily uses C# for server-side programming, while Next.js uses JavaScript, specifically with Node.js, for both client-side and server-side development. This difference in language compatibility can influence the choice of framework based on a developer's familiarity and preferences.

  2. Server-side Rendering: ASP.NET focuses on server-side rendering, where the HTML is generated on the server before being sent to the client's browser. In contrast, Next.js supports both server-side and client-side rendering, providing flexibility in rendering strategies based on the project requirements.

  3. Library Ecosystem: ASP.NET has a rich library ecosystem provided by Microsoft, offering a wide range of tools and features for web development. Next.js, being a React-based framework, leverages the extensive React ecosystem for building interactive user interfaces and components.

  4. Routing: ASP.NET provides routing through the use of controllers and routes defined in the project structure. Next.js, on the other hand, offers a file-system-based routing system, where routes are defined based on the file structure within the project directory.

  5. Deployment Process: ASP.NET applications are typically deployed on Microsoft IIS servers, requiring specific configurations and setups. In comparison, Next.js applications can be easily deployed on various platforms, including cloud services like Vercel or Netlify, simplifying the deployment process for developers.

  6. Community Support: ASP.NET has a strong community support backed by Microsoft, providing resources, documentation, and updates for developers. Next.js, being an open-source project, benefits from the vast React community, offering community-driven solutions and plugins for enhancing development workflows.

In Summary, ASP.NET and Next.js differ in language compatibility, rendering strategies, library ecosystems, routing mechanisms, deployment processes, and community support, influencing the choice of framework for web development projects.

Decisions about ASP.NET and Next.js
Lucas Litton
Founder & CEO at Macombey · | 13 upvotes · 569.2K views

Next.js is probably the most enjoyable React framework our team could have picked. The development is an extremely smooth process, the file structure is beautiful and organized, and the speed is no joke. Our work with Next.js comes out much faster than if it was built on pure React or frameworks alike. We were previously developing all of our projects in Meteor before making the switch. We left Meteor due to the slow compiler and website speed. We deploy all of our Next.js projects on Vercel.

See more

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

See more
Christopher Wray
Web Developer at Soltech LLC · | 6 upvotes · 409.9K views

When I started on this project as the sole developer, I was new to web development and I was looking at all of the web frameworks available for the job. I had some experience with Ruby on Rails and I had looked into .net for a bit, but when I found Laravel, it felt like the best framework for me to get the product to market. What made me choose Laravel was the easy to read documentation and active community. Rails had great documentation, but lacked some features built in that I wanted out of the box, while .net had a ton of video documentation tutorials, but nothing as straightforward as Laravels. So far, I am happy with the decision I made, and looking forward to the website release!

See more
Alexander Krylkov
Sofrware Architect at Air Astana · | 2 upvotes · 226.2K views

Comparing to ASP.NET Core MVC or ASP.NET Core Web API Simplify.Web allows you to easily build your web-site or REST API without any additional/complicated setup, covering cases like localization by default. It's projects structure very lightweight, just a minimum amount of what you need to setup ASP.NET Core request pipeline.

It is build on top of Simplify.DI IOC container abstraction, no dependency on Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection and it's syntax. You can easily switch between DryIoc, SimpleInjector, CastleWindsor etc.

Any internal module of Simplify.Web can be easily replaced on extended by your custom module, covering your custom cases.

For HTML pages generation Simplify.Templates can be used allowing you to use just regular plain HTML without additional setup.

Can be easily integrated with Simplify.WindowsServices converting your web application not just to web-application, but a standalone windows service which can also do some background jobs via Simplify.WindowsServices.

And it is open source, of course :)

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of ASP.NET
Pros of Next.js
  • 21
    Great mvc
  • 13
    Easy to learn
  • 6
    C#
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
  • 22
    Zero setup
  • 21
    Static site generator
  • 12
    Just JavaScript
  • 12
    Simple deployment
  • 12
    Incremental static regeneration
  • 10
    Filesystem as an API
  • 10
    Frictionless development
  • 9
    Everything is a function
  • 9
    Well Documented
  • 8
    Has many examples and integrations
  • 8
    Testing
  • 7
    Isomorphic React applications
  • 4
    File based routing + hooks built in
  • 2
    Deployment
  • 1
    SEO

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of ASP.NET
Cons of Next.js
  • 2
    Entity framework is very slow
  • 1
    C#
  • 1
    Not highly flexible for advance Developers
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is ASP.NET?

.NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications.

What is Next.js?

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use ASP.NET?
What companies use Next.js?
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with ASP.NET?
What tools integrate with Next.js?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to ASP.NET and Next.js?
ASP.NET Core
A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.
PHP
Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.
Django
Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
React
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
JavaScript
JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
See all alternatives