Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
ArangoDB vs DuckDB: What are the differences?
Introduction
ArangoDB and DuckDB are both database management systems that have unique features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between these two systems can help in deciding which one is most suitable for specific use cases.
Scalability: ArangoDB is a distributed database that offers horizontal scalability, allowing users to scale their data across multiple machines. It uses a cluster approach to handle large datasets and heavy workloads. On the other hand, DuckDB is a single-node database that does not provide built-in support for distributed setups. It is designed to be efficient for analytical workloads on a single machine.
Data Model: ArangoDB is a multi-model database, which means it supports multiple data models such as document, key-value, and graph. It provides a flexible data schema and allows complex queries involving different data models. In contrast, DuckDB is a relational database that strictly follows the relational data model principles. It supports SQL queries and traditional relational data operations.
Concurrency Control: ArangoDB utilizes multi-version concurrency control (MVCC) to handle concurrent transactions. MVCC allows for efficient read and write operations by enabling multiple users to read and modify the same data simultaneously. DuckDB, on the other hand, follows a more traditional concurrency control mechanism based on locking. This means that transactions might experience higher contention when accessing the same data simultaneously.
Storage Efficiency: ArangoDB uses a combination of in-memory and on-disk storage to achieve a balance between performance and persistence. It stores hot data in memory for faster access and persists less frequently accessed data on disk. DuckDB, being an analytical database, focuses more on in-memory operations and optimizations to provide faster query execution for analytical workloads.
Community and Ecosystem: ArangoDB has a larger and more established community compared to DuckDB. It has been around for a longer time and has a broader user base, which results in a wider range of community-driven plugins, extensions, and integrations with other tools. DuckDB, being a relatively new database, has a smaller but growing community with limited available extensions and integrations.
Use Case Focus: ArangoDB is suitable for use cases that require versatility in data models and complex queries involving multiple models. Its multi-model capabilities make it ideal for applications that handle diverse types of data, such as social networks, content management systems, and recommendation engines. DuckDB, on the other hand, caters specifically to analytical workloads. It is designed to efficiently process large volumes of data and perform complex analytics on a single machine.
In Summary, ArangoDB offers scalability, multi-model support, and a larger community, making it suitable for versatile applications that require complex queries involving diverse data models. On the other hand, DuckDB focuses on analytical workloads, providing efficiency and high performance on a single machine.
Pros of ArangoDB
- Grahps and documents in one DB37
- Intuitive and rich query language26
- Good documentation25
- Open source25
- Joins for collections21
- Foxx is great platform15
- Great out of the box web interface with API playground14
- Good driver support6
- Low maintenance efforts6
- Clustering6
- Easy microservice creation with foxx5
- You can write true backendless apps4
- Managed solution available2
- Performance0
Pros of DuckDB
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of ArangoDB
- Web ui has still room for improvement3
- No support for blueprints standard, using custom AQL2








