StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. ArangoDB vs DuckDB

ArangoDB vs DuckDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ArangoDB
ArangoDB
Stacks273
Followers442
Votes192
DuckDB
DuckDB
Stacks49
Followers60
Votes0

ArangoDB vs DuckDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

ArangoDB and DuckDB are both database management systems that have unique features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between these two systems can help in deciding which one is most suitable for specific use cases.

  1. Scalability: ArangoDB is a distributed database that offers horizontal scalability, allowing users to scale their data across multiple machines. It uses a cluster approach to handle large datasets and heavy workloads. On the other hand, DuckDB is a single-node database that does not provide built-in support for distributed setups. It is designed to be efficient for analytical workloads on a single machine.

  2. Data Model: ArangoDB is a multi-model database, which means it supports multiple data models such as document, key-value, and graph. It provides a flexible data schema and allows complex queries involving different data models. In contrast, DuckDB is a relational database that strictly follows the relational data model principles. It supports SQL queries and traditional relational data operations.

  3. Concurrency Control: ArangoDB utilizes multi-version concurrency control (MVCC) to handle concurrent transactions. MVCC allows for efficient read and write operations by enabling multiple users to read and modify the same data simultaneously. DuckDB, on the other hand, follows a more traditional concurrency control mechanism based on locking. This means that transactions might experience higher contention when accessing the same data simultaneously.

  4. Storage Efficiency: ArangoDB uses a combination of in-memory and on-disk storage to achieve a balance between performance and persistence. It stores hot data in memory for faster access and persists less frequently accessed data on disk. DuckDB, being an analytical database, focuses more on in-memory operations and optimizations to provide faster query execution for analytical workloads.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: ArangoDB has a larger and more established community compared to DuckDB. It has been around for a longer time and has a broader user base, which results in a wider range of community-driven plugins, extensions, and integrations with other tools. DuckDB, being a relatively new database, has a smaller but growing community with limited available extensions and integrations.

  6. Use Case Focus: ArangoDB is suitable for use cases that require versatility in data models and complex queries involving multiple models. Its multi-model capabilities make it ideal for applications that handle diverse types of data, such as social networks, content management systems, and recommendation engines. DuckDB, on the other hand, caters specifically to analytical workloads. It is designed to efficiently process large volumes of data and perform complex analytics on a single machine.

In Summary, ArangoDB offers scalability, multi-model support, and a larger community, making it suitable for versatile applications that require complex queries involving diverse data models. On the other hand, DuckDB focuses on analytical workloads, providing efficiency and high performance on a single machine.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

ArangoDB
ArangoDB
DuckDB
DuckDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

It is an embedded database designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast while embedded in another process. It is designed to be easy to install and easy to use. DuckDB has no external dependencies. It has bindings for C/C++, Python and R.

multi-model nosql db; acid; transactions; javascript; database; nosql; sharding; replication; query language; joins; aql; documents; graphs; key-values; graphdb
Embedded database; Designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast; No external dependencies
Statistics
Stacks
273
Stacks
49
Followers
442
Followers
60
Votes
192
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    Grahps and documents in one DB
  • 26
    Intuitive and rich query language
  • 25
    Good documentation
  • 25
    Open source
  • 21
    Joins for collections
Cons
  • 3
    Web ui has still room for improvement
  • 2
    No support for blueprints standard, using custom AQL
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python
C++
C++
R Language
R Language

What are some alternatives to ArangoDB, DuckDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase