StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Mobile Testing Frameworks
  5. Appium vs Detox

Appium vs Detox

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Appium
Appium
Stacks650
Followers574
Votes28
GitHub Stars20.8K
Forks6.2K
Detox
Detox
Stacks137
Followers95
Votes9
GitHub Stars11.7K
Forks1.9K

Appium vs Detox: What are the differences?

Introduction

Appium and Detox are both automation frameworks that are commonly used for mobile app testing. While they have similarities in some aspects, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Programming Language Support: One significant difference between Appium and Detox lies in the programming languages they support. Appium supports a wide range of programming languages, including Java, Python, Ruby, and JavaScript. On the other hand, Detox is primarily designed for JavaScript-based applications and has better integration with JavaScript frameworks like React Native and Flutter.

  2. Platform Support: Another important difference is the platform support provided by Appium and Detox. Appium supports cross-platform testing for both Android and iOS devices, making it a versatile choice. Detox, on the other hand, focuses mainly on iOS apps and provides limited support for Android. This platform-specific approach can be a deciding factor when choosing between the two frameworks.

  3. Device Interaction: Appium and Detox differ in their approach to device interaction during testing. Appium relies on the automation APIs provided by the mobile platforms to interact with the device and its components. Detox, on the other hand, uses a direct injection mechanism called "EarlGrey" to interact with the iOS app. This approach enables Detox to perform actions faster and more reliably, especially for complex user scenarios.

  4. Synchronization and Speed: Appium and Detox also differ in terms of synchronization and test speed. Appium relies on synchronization mechanisms like waiting for elements to appear, leading to slower test execution. Detox, on the other hand, leverages synchronization features offered by EarlGrey and uses a non-blocking event loop, resulting in faster test execution times.

  5. Parallel Test Execution: When it comes to parallel test execution, Detox has a more streamlined and efficient approach compared to Appium. Detox can run multiple tests concurrently, improving overall testing efficiency. Appium, on the other hand, has limitations in parallel execution due to the shared nature of the Appium server, which can slow down the execution of multiple tests simultaneously.

  6. Community and Support: Lastly, the Appium and Detox frameworks have different levels of community support and resources available. Appium has been around for a longer time and has a larger user community, resulting in a more extensive knowledge base, documentation, and community support. Detox, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community, but it is growing steadily and has active contributors.

In summary, Appium provides broader programming language and platform support, while Detox excels in faster device interaction, synchronization, and parallel test execution for JavaScript-based apps, particularly on iOS. The choice between the two frameworks depends on the specific requirements, platform focus, and expertise in the respective programming languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Appium
Appium
Detox
Detox

Appium is an open source test automation framework for use with native, hybrid, and mobile web apps. It drives iOS and Android apps using the WebDriver protocol. Appium is sponsored by Sauce Labs and a thriving community of open source developers.

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Works on native and hybrid mobile apps; Write mobile tests using any language or framework; Open source; Facilitates mobile continuous integration; Mobile test automation tool; Cross-platform (iOS, Android); Framework based on Selenium
Automatically Synchronized; Test Runner Independent; Debuggable
Statistics
GitHub Stars
20.8K
GitHub Stars
11.7K
GitHub Forks
6.2K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
Stacks
650
Stacks
137
Followers
574
Followers
95
Votes
28
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 12
    Webdriverio support
  • 6
    Java, C#, Python support
  • 3
    Open source
  • 2
    Great GUI with inspector
  • 2
    Active community
Pros
  • 6
    Grey box testing
  • 3
    Automated testing
Integrations
Sauce Labs
Sauce Labs
JavaScript
JavaScript
React Native
React Native
macOS
macOS

What are some alternatives to Appium, Detox?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Codeception

Codeception

Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana