Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apigee vs Swagger UI: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Apigee and Swagger UI
Introduction
Apigee and Swagger UI are both popular tools used in the field of API development and documentation. While they serve similar purposes, there are distinct differences between the two. This article aims to highlight the key differences between Apigee and Swagger UI.
Backend Integration: Apigee offers a comprehensive API management platform that includes features like security, analytics, and monetization. It seamlessly integrates with backend systems and provides extensive control over API lifecycle management. On the other hand, Swagger UI is primarily a documentation tool that focuses on visualizing and interacting with APIs. It is lightweight and does not offer the same level of backend integration as Apigee.
Design First vs Code First: Apigee follows a design-first approach, where the API design is defined before the actual implementation. It emphasizes creating a well-structured API using specifications like OpenAPI and GraphQL, enabling better documentation and collaboration. Swagger UI, on the other hand, is more code-first oriented, allowing developers to generate API documentation from existing code. It is suitable for teams that prefer to focus on the code first and then generate documentation automatically.
Security Features: Apigee provides robust security features out of the box, including authentication, authorization, and threat protection. It allows developers to define and enforce fine-grained security policies at different levels of API access. Swagger UI, on the other hand, does not offer built-in security features. It is primarily focused on documenting the API and does not provide advanced security capabilities like Apigee.
Governance and Versioning: Apigee offers comprehensive governance capabilities, allowing organizations to manage a large number of APIs effectively. It provides advanced features like API versioning, rate limiting, caching, and auditing. Swagger UI, on the other hand, does not provide native governance features. It is more suitable for smaller projects or teams that don't require advanced governance capabilities.
Developer Portal and Community Features: Apigee includes a developer portal that serves as a centralized hub for API consumers. It provides self-service documentation, interactive API consoles, and community features like forums and support. Swagger UI, although it allows generating documentation, does not offer the same level of developer portal functionality.
Deployment Options: Apigee is available as a cloud-based solution or as an on-premises deployment for organizations with stricter security or regulatory requirements. It provides flexibility in choosing the deployment option that best suits the organization's needs. Swagger UI, on the other hand, is primarily used as a self-hosted solution, where the generated documentation can be deployed on a web server.
In summary, Apigee is a comprehensive API management platform with extensive backend integration, security, governance, and developer portal features. Swagger UI, on the other hand, is a lightweight documentation tool focused on visualizing and interacting with APIs, with a code-first approach and limited backend integration.
From a StackShare Community member: "I just started working for a start-up and we are in desperate need of better documentation for our API. Currently our API docs is in a README.md file. We are evaluating Postman and Swagger UI. Since there are many options and I was wondering what other StackSharers would recommend?"
I use Postman because of the ease of team-management, using workspaces and teams, runner, collections, environment variables, test-scripts (post execution), variable management (pre and post execution), folders (inside collections, for better management of APIs), newman, easy-ci-integration (and probably a few more things that I am not able to recall right now).
I use Swagger UI because it's an easy tool for end-consumers to visualize and test our APIs. It focuses on that ! And it's directly embedded and delivered with the APIs. Postman's built-in tools aren't bad, but their main focus isn't the documentation and also, they are hosted outside the project.
I recommend Postman because it's easy to use with history option. Also, it has very great features like runner, collections, test scripts runners, defining environment variables and simple exporting and importing data.
Pros of Apigee
- Highly scalable and secure API Management Platform12
- Good documentation6
- Quick jumpstart6
- Fast and adjustable caching3
- Easy to use3
Pros of Swagger UI
- Open Source49
- Can execute api calls from the documentation34
- Free to use29
- Customizable19
- Easy to implement in .Net14
- Mature, clean spec13
- API Visualization12
- Coverage9
- Scaffolding6
- Easy to use6
- Vibrant and active community5
- Elegant4
- Adopted by tm forum api3
- Clear for React2
- Api1
- Can deploy API to AWS API Gateway and AWS Lambda1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apigee
- Expensive11
- Doesn't support hybrid natively1
Cons of Swagger UI
- Need to learn YAML and RAML3
- Documentation doesn't look that good2
- Doesn't generate code snippets in different languages1
- You don’t actually get in-line error highlighting1
- Does not support hypermedia1