StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Parquet vs HBase

Apache Parquet vs HBase

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

HBase
HBase
Stacks511
Followers498
Votes15
GitHub Stars5.5K
Forks3.4K
Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Stacks97
Followers190
Votes0

Apache Parquet vs HBase: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Parquet and HBase are both popular technologies used in big data processing. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between the two. In this article, we will discuss six important differences between Apache Parquet and HBase.

  1. Data Storage Format: Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format designed for efficient analytics on big data. It organizes data by column, which allows for fast read and write operations. On the other hand, HBase is a distributed key-value store that stores data in a tabular form based on a primary key. It is optimized for random read and write operations.

  2. Data Model: Apache Parquet does not have a fixed schema and supports flexible data models, allowing for schema evolution. It can handle both structured and semi-structured data. In contrast, HBase has a fixed schema, where the table structure is defined during table creation. It is suitable for structured data only.

  3. Data Access: Apache Parquet provides efficient columnar storage and compression techniques, which make it ideal for analytical queries where only a few columns need to be accessed. It supports predicate pushdown, which reduces the amount of data that needs to be read from disk. HBase is designed for random read and write operations, making it suitable for real-time applications that require low latency access to the entire row.

  4. Scalability: Apache Parquet can achieve high scalability by leveraging distributed file systems like Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS). It can handle petabytes of data by distributing data across multiple nodes. HBase is built on top of HDFS and provides horizontal scalability by sharding data across a cluster of nodes.

  5. Indexing: Apache Parquet stores metadata in the footer of the file, which includes statistics and min/max values for each column. This enables efficient column pruning during query execution. On the other hand, HBase uses indexes like Bloom filters and secondary indexes to speed up data retrieval based on the primary key.

  6. Data Consistency: Apache Parquet guarantees strong consistency, as it provides atomicity and isolation guarantees for read and write operations. In HBase, consistency can be configured based on the requirements of the application. It supports strong consistency, eventual consistency, and other consistency models.

Summary

In summary, Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format suitable for analytical queries on big data, while HBase is a distributed key-value store optimized for random read and write operations. Apache Parquet supports flexible data models, efficient columnar storage, and scalability using distributed file systems. On the other hand, HBase has a fixed schema, provides low-latency access to row-level data, and supports indexing for faster data retrieval.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

HBase
HBase
Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet

Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.

It is a columnar storage format available to any project in the Hadoop ecosystem, regardless of the choice of data processing framework, data model or programming language.

-
Columnar storage format;Type-specific encoding; Pig integration; Cascading integration; Crunch integration; Apache Arrow integration; Apache Scrooge integration;Adaptive dictionary encoding; Predicate pushdown; Column stats
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
511
Stacks
97
Followers
498
Followers
190
Votes
15
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Performance
  • 5
    OLTP
  • 1
    Fast Point Queries
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Pig
Pig

What are some alternatives to HBase, Apache Parquet?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase