StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Parquet vs DuckDB

Apache Parquet vs DuckDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Stacks97
Followers190
Votes0
DuckDB
DuckDB
Stacks49
Followers60
Votes0

Apache Parquet vs DuckDB: What are the differences?

Introduction: Apache Parquet and DuckDB are two widely used columnar storage file formats that are utilized in big data and data warehousing environments. While they both serve the purpose of efficiently storing and querying large datasets, there are key differences between the two technologies.

1. Data Storage Format: Apache Parquet is a file format that stores data in a columnar format, which improves query performance by allowing the system to read only the necessary columns. On the other hand, DuckDB is a columnar database system that stores data in columnar format within the database itself, enabling faster query processing compared to traditional row-based databases.

2. Query Processing: Apache Parquet is primarily meant for storing and efficiently reading large datasets, while DuckDB is designed for both storing and querying data, providing support for complex SQL queries and aggregations. DuckDB offers optimized query processing techniques such as vectorization and SIMD instructions, which can significantly improve query performance.

3. File System Dependency: Apache Parquet relies on Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) or other file systems as its underlying storage layer, making it suitable for integration with Hadoop ecosystem tools. In contrast, DuckDB is a self-contained database system that does not have any external dependencies on file systems, enabling easy deployment and operation in various environments.

4. Supported Data Types: Apache Parquet supports a wide range of data types including simple types like integers and strings, as well as complex types like nested structures and arrays. On the other hand, DuckDB provides support for various data types that are commonly used in relational databases, allowing users to work with diverse datasets seamlessly.

5. Compression Techniques: Apache Parquet employs advanced compression techniques such as dictionary encoding, run-length encoding, and bit-packing to reduce storage space and improve query performance. In comparison, DuckDB utilizes a combination of lightweight compression algorithms to achieve high compression ratios while maintaining fast query processing speeds.

6. Workload Optimization: Apache Parquet is optimized for analytical workloads that involve scanning large datasets and running complex queries, making it ideal for business intelligence and data analytics applications. DuckDB, on the other hand, is designed for transactional workloads that involve frequent data updates and real-time query processing, making it suitable for interactive data analysis and online transaction processing (OLTP) scenarios.

In Summary, Apache Parquet and DuckDB differ in terms of data storage format, query processing capabilities, file system dependency, supported data types, compression techniques, and workload optimization, making them suitable for distinct use cases in the realm of big data and data warehousing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
DuckDB
DuckDB

It is a columnar storage format available to any project in the Hadoop ecosystem, regardless of the choice of data processing framework, data model or programming language.

It is an embedded database designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast while embedded in another process. It is designed to be easy to install and easy to use. DuckDB has no external dependencies. It has bindings for C/C++, Python and R.

Columnar storage format;Type-specific encoding; Pig integration; Cascading integration; Crunch integration; Apache Arrow integration; Apache Scrooge integration;Adaptive dictionary encoding; Predicate pushdown; Column stats
Embedded database; Designed to execute analytical SQL queries fast; No external dependencies
Statistics
Stacks
97
Stacks
49
Followers
190
Followers
60
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Pig
Pig
Python
Python
C++
C++
R Language
R Language

What are some alternatives to Apache Parquet, DuckDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase