StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Parquet vs Cassandra

Apache Parquet vs Cassandra

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Cassandra
Cassandra
Stacks3.6K
Followers3.5K
Votes507
GitHub Stars9.5K
Forks3.8K
Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet
Stacks97
Followers190
Votes0

Apache Parquet vs Cassandra: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Apache Parquet and Cassandra

Apache Parquet and Cassandra are both widely used technologies in the data storage and processing domain. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Data Storage Model: Apache Parquet is a columnar storage file format that is designed for efficient data processing and analytics. It stores data in a column-wise manner, which allows for fast and efficient querying. On the other hand, Cassandra is a distributed NoSQL database that is designed for high availability and scalability. It uses a partitioned row store model to store data across a cluster of machines.

  2. Data Model: Apache Parquet does not have a built-in data model. It is a schema evolution-supporting format that can work with various data models, including relational and nested data structures. Cassandra, on the other hand, has a flexible and dynamic data model based on a key-value pair model. It allows for dynamic column addition and removal without affecting the existing data.

  3. Data Consistency: Apache Parquet does not provide any built-in mechanisms for data consistency and does not support transactions. It is primarily used for batch processing and analytics workloads. On the other hand, Cassandra provides built-in mechanisms for data consistency and supports distributed transactions. It is designed for high write throughput and can handle real-time workloads.

  4. Data Replication and Distribution: Apache Parquet does not have built-in replication and distribution mechanisms, as it is typically used with other distributed storage systems like Hadoop Distributed File System (HDFS) or cloud storage solutions. Cassandra, on the other hand, has built-in replication and distribution mechanisms, which allow it to provide high availability and fault tolerance.

  5. Querying and Indexing: Apache Parquet is optimized for efficient analytical processing and supports predicate pushdown, which improves query performance by pushing filters down to the storage layer. It also supports dictionary encoding and compression techniques to further improve query performance. Cassandra, on the other hand, supports a query language called Cassandra Query Language (CQL) and provides secondary indexing capabilities. It is designed for real-time querying and provides low-latency read and write operations.

  6. Data Consistency and Availability Guarantees: Apache Parquet does not provide any specific guarantees for data consistency or availability. It relies on the underlying storage system for durability and availability. Cassandra, on the other hand, provides tunable consistency and availability levels. It uses a distributed architecture with replication and automatic data repair mechanisms to ensure high data availability and fault tolerance.

In Summary, Apache Parquet is a columnar storage file format optimized for analytics workloads, while Cassandra is a distributed NoSQL database designed for high availability and scalability with support for real-time querying and transactions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Cassandra, Apache Parquet

Vinay
Vinay

Head of Engineering

Sep 19, 2019

Needs advice

The problem I have is - we need to process & change(update/insert) 55M Data every 2 min and this updated data to be available for Rest API for Filtering / Selection. Response time for Rest API should be less than 1 sec.

The most important factors for me are processing and storing time of 2 min. There need to be 2 views of Data One is for Selection & 2. Changed data.

174k views174k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Cassandra
Cassandra
Apache Parquet
Apache Parquet

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

It is a columnar storage format available to any project in the Hadoop ecosystem, regardless of the choice of data processing framework, data model or programming language.

-
Columnar storage format;Type-specific encoding; Pig integration; Cascading integration; Crunch integration; Apache Arrow integration; Apache Scrooge integration;Adaptive dictionary encoding; Predicate pushdown; Column stats
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.5K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
3.6K
Stacks
97
Followers
3.5K
Followers
190
Votes
507
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 119
    Distributed
  • 98
    High performance
  • 81
    High availability
  • 74
    Easy scalability
  • 53
    Replication
Cons
  • 3
    Reliability of replication
  • 1
    Size
  • 1
    Updates
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
Hadoop
Hadoop
Java
Java
Apache Impala
Apache Impala
Apache Thrift
Apache Thrift
Apache Hive
Apache Hive
Pig
Pig

What are some alternatives to Cassandra, Apache Parquet?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase