StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Apache Ignite vs HBase

Apache Ignite vs HBase

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

HBase
HBase
Stacks511
Followers498
Votes15
GitHub Stars5.5K
Forks3.4K
Apache Ignite
Apache Ignite
Stacks110
Followers168
Votes41
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks1.9K

Apache Ignite vs HBase: What are the differences?

Apache Ignite and Apache HBase are both popular distributed database systems, but they differ in their architecture and use cases. Below are the key differences between Apache Ignite and HBase:

  1. Data Model: Apache Ignite is an in-memory data grid that can function as a distributed cache, SQL database, and processing platform. It offers support for SQL queries and transactions, making it suitable for real-time analytics and high-performance transactional systems. On the other hand, Apache HBase is a distributed, scalable, and consistent database that is optimized for read and write-intensive workloads. It is designed for storing large amounts of sparse data in a tabular format, making it ideal for use cases such as time-series data and random access to large data sets.

  2. Consistency Model: Apache Ignite provides strong consistency guarantees, ensuring that all read and write operations are visible to all clients in a timely manner. It uses a distributed MVCC (Multi-Version Concurrency Control) mechanism to maintain data consistency across the cluster. In contrast, Apache HBase offers eventual consistency by default, meaning that read operations may not always reflect the most recent write immediately. It relies on the HBase region server to replicate data across different nodes in the cluster, which can lead to eventual consistency issues in some scenarios.

  3. Query Language Support: Apache Ignite supports SQL queries through its native SQL engine, allowing users to perform complex queries on distributed data sets. It also supports indexing and full-text search capabilities to enhance query performance. On the other hand, Apache HBase does not provide built-in support for SQL queries. Instead, it offers a Java-based API for data manipulation and retrieval, requiring users to write custom code for data operations.

  4. Storage Format: Apache Ignite stores data in memory and can optionally persist it to disk for durability and fault tolerance. It uses a distributed and partitioned storage model to ensure data availability and reliability in the event of node failures. In contrast, Apache HBase stores data on HDFS (Hadoop Distributed File System) and leverages Hadoop's replication capabilities for data redundancy. It uses a column-oriented storage format to improve read and write performance for large-scale data processing.

  5. Secondary Indexes: Apache Ignite supports the creation of secondary indexes on distributed data sets, enabling efficient lookup operations and query optimization. Users can create multiple indexes on different columns to speed up data retrieval and filtering. In contrast, Apache HBase does not natively support secondary indexes. Users often have to denormalize data or use external indexing solutions such as Apache Phoenix to enable secondary index functionality in HBase.

  6. Complex Event Processing: Apache Ignite provides built-in support for complex event processing (CEP) through its event streaming and processing capabilities. It can process and analyze real-time data streams, detect patterns, and trigger actions based on predefined rules. Apache HBase does not offer native support for CEP functionalities, requiring users to implement custom solutions or integrate with external CEP engines for complex event processing tasks.

In Summary, Apache Ignite and HBase differ in terms of their data model, consistency model, query language support, storage format, secondary indexes, and complex event processing capabilities. Each system has its strengths and is suited for different use cases based on these key differences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

HBase
HBase
Apache Ignite
Apache Ignite

Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.

It is a memory-centric distributed database, caching, and processing platform for transactional, analytical, and streaming workloads delivering in-memory speeds at petabyte scale

-
Memory-Centric Storage; Distributed SQL; Distributed Key-Value
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.5K
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
1.9K
Stacks
511
Stacks
110
Followers
498
Followers
168
Votes
15
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Performance
  • 5
    OLTP
  • 1
    Fast Point Queries
Pros
  • 5
    Multiple client language support
  • 5
    Free
  • 5
    High Avaliability
  • 5
    Written in java. runs on jvm
  • 4
    Load balancing
Integrations
No integrations available
MongoDB
MongoDB
MySQL
MySQL
Apache Spark
Apache Spark

What are some alternatives to HBase, Apache Ignite?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

Redis

Redis

Redis is an open source (BSD licensed), in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache, and message broker. Redis provides data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, and streams.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase