StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache HTTP Server vs Swoole

Apache HTTP Server vs Swoole

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Stacks64.5K
Followers22.8K
Votes1.4K
GitHub Stars3.8K
Forks1.2K
Swoole
Swoole
Stacks57
Followers134
Votes27
GitHub Stars18.8K
Forks3.2K

Apache HTTP Server vs Swoole: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache HTTP Server and Swoole are both popular server software used in web development. While they serve similar purposes, there are key differences between them that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Event-driven vs. Process-driven: One of the main differences between Apache HTTP Server and Swoole is their underlying architecture. Apache HTTP Server follows a process-driven model, where each incoming request spawns a new process or thread to handle it. On the other hand, Swoole adopts an event-driven model, making it more lightweight and efficient in handling multiple simultaneous connections.

  2. Concurrency Model: Apache HTTP Server uses a multi-process or multi-threaded model to achieve concurrency. Each process or thread handles one connection at a time, allowing simultaneous handling of multiple connections. In contrast, Swoole utilizes event loops and coroutines to achieve concurrency, allowing multiple connections to be processed concurrently within a single thread.

  3. Language Support: Apache HTTP Server primarily supports programming languages such as PHP, Perl, and Python through various modules. It acts as a general-purpose web server that can serve static files and execute server-side scripts written in these languages. On the other hand, Swoole is specifically designed for PHP and provides event-driven concurrency for PHP applications.

  4. Performance: Due to its event-driven architecture and lightweight concurrency model, Swoole generally outperforms Apache HTTP Server in terms of performance. Swoole's ability to handle multiple connections concurrently within a single thread reduces the overhead of context switching and resource allocation, leading to improved response times and higher throughput compared to Apache HTTP Server.

  5. Scalability: Swoole's event-driven and asynchronous design makes it highly scalable, allowing it to efficiently handle a large number of connections with minimal resource consumption. Its ability to handle concurrent connections within a single thread also makes it well-suited for microservices architectures. Apache HTTP Server, while scalable to a certain extent, may face limitations in terms of handling a massive number of simultaneous connections.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Apache HTTP Server has a long-standing and mature community with a vast ecosystem of modules and plugins developed over the years. This extensive community support provides a wide range of features and functionalities that can be integrated with the server. Swoole, being relatively newer, has a smaller community and ecosystem compared to Apache HTTP Server. Although growing rapidly, it may have fewer ready-to-use modules and plugins available.

In summary, Apache HTTP Server and Swoole differ in their underlying architecture, concurrency models, language support, performance, scalability, and community support. Each has its own strengths and suitability for different use cases in web development.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache HTTP Server, Swoole

Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Swoole
Swoole

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

-
Mobile API Server; Internet Of Things; Micro Services; Web API Or Web Application; Gaming Servers; Live Chat Systems
Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.8K
GitHub Stars
18.8K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
GitHub Forks
3.2K
Stacks
64.5K
Stacks
57
Followers
22.8K
Followers
134
Votes
1.4K
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 479
    Web server
  • 305
    Most widely-used web server
  • 217
    Virtual hosting
  • 148
    Fast
  • 138
    Ssl support
Cons
  • 4
    Hard to set up
Pros
  • 7
    Async programming
  • 6
    Really multi thread
  • 5
    Blazing fast
  • 3
    High-performance http, websocket, tcp, udp server
  • 3
    Coroutines concurrency model
Integrations
No integrations available
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
CentOS
CentOS
PHP
PHP
Redis
Redis
MySQL
MySQL
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
React
React
Linux
Linux
FreeBSD
FreeBSD
PHPUnit
PHPUnit

What are some alternatives to Apache HTTP Server, Swoole?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase