StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. GreenSock vs anime.js

GreenSock vs anime.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

GreenSock
GreenSock
Stacks82
Followers117
Votes0
anime.js
anime.js
Stacks44
Followers67
Votes0
GitHub Stars65.1K
Forks4.4K

GreenSock vs anime.js: What are the differences?

Introduction

GreenSock and anime.js are both popular JavaScript animation libraries used for creating dynamic and engaging animations on websites. While they have a similar purpose, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Syntax and Learning Curve: GreenSock (GSAP) primarily uses a more traditional syntax that is similar to jQuery, making it easier for developers who are already familiar with jQuery or JavaScript syntax. On the other hand, anime.js has a simpler and more concise syntax that is easier to grasp for beginners and those with less experience in JavaScript.

  2. Tweening Options: GreenSock offers a wide range of tweens and easing options, providing developers with more fine-grained control over animations. It also has built-in features like timeline control and smooth SVG support. In comparison, anime.js has a smaller set of default easing functions and fewer built-in features, but it allows for more customization and control through its flexibility in defining custom easing and manipulating CSS properties.

  3. Plugin Availability: GreenSock has a comprehensive set of plugins that extend its functionality and allow for advanced animations, such as morphing, physics-based animations, and text effects. On the other hand, while anime.js does have some plugins available, it has a more limited selection compared to GreenSock.

  4. Browser Support and Performance: GreenSock has been around for a longer time and has a strong reputation for its performance and reliability. It is well-supported across different browsers and has been extensively tested. Anime.js, while also having good browser support, is relatively newer and may not have undergone as extensive testing in a wide range of scenarios.

  5. Community and Documentation: GreenSock has a large and active community with a wealth of documentation, tutorials, and examples available. It has been widely adopted by many developers and is often considered the industry standard for JavaScript animation. Anime.js, while growing in popularity, may have a smaller community and fewer resources available for support and learning.

  6. Size and Weight: GreenSock offers a modular approach where developers can choose to include only the specific modules they need, reducing the overall file size. Anime.js, on the other hand, has a smaller file size by default and does not offer modularization, meaning that all its functionality is included in a single package.

In summary, GreenSock and anime.js differ in syntax and learning curve, tweening options, plugin availability, browser support and performance, community and documentation, as well as the size and weight of the library.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

GreenSock
GreenSock
anime.js
anime.js

It is a JavaScript library for creating high-performance animations that work in every major browser. It delivers advanced sequencing, reliability, API efficiency, and tight control while solving real-world problems. It works around countless browser inconsistencies.

It is a lightweight JavaScript animation library with a simple, yet powerful API. It works with CSS properties, SVG, DOM attributes and JavaScript Objects.

-
Layered CSS transforms; Controls and callbacks;Animate anything
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
65.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
4.4K
Stacks
82
Stacks
44
Followers
117
Followers
67
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Opera Browser
Opera Browser
JavaScript
JavaScript
CSS 3
CSS 3
HTML5
HTML5
Safari
Safari
Firefox
Firefox
Microsoft Edge
Microsoft Edge
Google Chrome
Google Chrome

What are some alternatives to GreenSock, anime.js?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase