Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Android SDK vs Tornado: What are the differences?
Programming Language Support: One major difference between Android SDK and Tornado is the programming language support. Android SDK primarily uses Java and Kotlin for app development, while Tornado is a Python web framework used for building web applications.
Platform Compatibility: Android SDK is specifically designed for developing applications for the Android operating system, making it suitable for mobile app development. On the other hand, Tornado is a versatile framework that can be used for building web applications on various platforms.
Use Case: Android SDK is mainly used for developing mobile applications that run on Android devices, providing a robust set of tools and libraries for this purpose. In contrast, Tornado is focused on creating web applications with asynchronous features, making it suitable for real-time applications like chat servers and streaming services.
Community Support: Android SDK benefits from a large community of developers and users due to its popularity in mobile app development. Tornado, although less popular, also has a dedicated community that contributes to its growth and development.
Learning Curve: While both Android SDK and Tornado require some learning curve to use effectively, Android SDK may have a steeper learning curve due to the complexities of mobile app development and understanding the Android platform. Tornado, being a web framework, may be more approachable for those familiar with Python and web development.
Scalability: Android SDK is well-suited for developing scalable mobile applications, but it may face limitations when it comes to scaling web applications. Tornado, on the other hand, is designed to handle high concurrency and is known for its scalability in web applications.
In Summary, Android SDK is primarily used for mobile app development on the Android platform, while Tornado is a Python web framework focused on building web applications with asynchronous capabilities. Each tool has its strengths and is suitable for different types of projects based on programming language preferences, use cases, platform compatibility, community support, learning curve, and scalability requirements.
We actually initially wrote a lot of networking code in Kotlin but the complexities involved prompted us to try and compile NodeJS for Android and port over all the networking logic to Node and communicate with node over the Java Native Interface.
This turned out to be a great decision considering our battery usage fell by 40% and rate of development increased by a factor of 2.
Pros of Android SDK
- Android development289
- Necessary for android156
- Android studio128
- Mobile framework86
- Backed by google82
- Platform-tools27
- Eclipse + adt plugin21
- Powerful, simple, one stop environment5
- Free3
- Больно3
Pros of Tornado
- Open source37
- So fast31
- Great for microservices architecture27
- Websockets20
- Simple17
- Asynchronous14
- Python11
- Lightweight7
- Handles well persistent connexions3
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Android SDK
Cons of Tornado
- Event loop is complicated2
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Android SDK?
What is Tornado?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Tornado?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Android SDK?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+3
+3
+47+46
+37
+26