Amazon Zocalo vs SharePoint

Overview

Amazon Zocalo

Stacks9

Followers12

Votes0

Microsoft SharePoint

Stacks442

Followers314

Votes7

Amazon Zocalo vs SharePoint: What are the differences?

Storage location and ownership: Amazon Zocalo stores data in Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centers, while SharePoint primarily stores data on-premises or in Microsoft's cloud. Additionally, Amazon Zocalo gives users ownership of their data, meaning they can control who has access to their files, while SharePoint might have restrictions or limitations on ownership rights.
Collaboration features: Amazon Zocalo offers real-time collaboration features, allowing multiple users to edit documents simultaneously, while SharePoint may have limitations in this area. Zocalo includes features such as version tracking, comments, and notifications to enhance collaboration among team members.
Integration with other services: Amazon Zocalo integrates seamlessly with other AWS services such as WorkDocs, WorkMail, and WorkSpaces, providing a holistic productivity solution for users. In contrast, SharePoint can integrate with Microsoft 365 applications, but may not offer the same level of integration with third-party services.
Security and compliance: Amazon Zocalo offers robust security measures such as encryption, access controls, and audit logs to ensure data protection and compliance with industry regulations. SharePoint also provides security features, but Zocalo may have more advanced security options tailored for enterprise-level data protection.
Pricing model: Amazon Zocalo follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the storage and features they use. On the other hand, SharePoint typically offers subscription-based pricing plans that may include bundled services, making it potentially more cost-effective for organizations with diverse needs.
Customization and scalability: Amazon Zocalo allows for customization through APIs and SDKs, enabling users to tailor the platform to their specific requirements. SharePoint also offers customization options, but Zocalo may have greater scalability potential due to its cloud-based architecture and flexibility in adapting to changing business needs.

In Summary, Amazon Zocalo and SharePoint differ in terms of storage location, collaboration features, integration capabilities, security measures, pricing models, and customization options, catering to different organizational requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Zocalo	Microsoft SharePoint
Users can comment on files, send them to others for feedback, and upload new versions without having to resort to emailing multiple versions of their files as attachments.	It empowers teamwork with dynamic and productive team sites for every project team, department, and division. Share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and seamlessly collaborate across the organization.
Simple Document Feedback;Central Hub;Access and Sync from Any Device;Low Cost; Secure;Integrate your Corporate Directory	Authentication; Business Intelligence; Web Content Management
Statistics
Stacks 9	Stacks 442
Followers 12	Followers 314
Votes 0	Votes 7
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet	Pros 3 Great online support 1 Secure 1 Stable Platform 1 Seamless intergration with MS Office 1 Perfect version control Cons 2 Rigid, hard to add external applicaions 1 User interface. Steep learning curve, old-fashioned
Integrations
No integrations available	Jira Slack

What are some alternatives to Amazon Zocalo, Microsoft SharePoint?

Google Drive

Keep photos, stories, designs, drawings, recordings, videos, and more. Your first 15 GB of storage are free with a Google Account. Your files in Drive can be reached from any smartphone, tablet, or computer.

Dropbox

Harness the power of Dropbox. Connect to an account, upload, download, search, and more.

Box

The Box API gives you access to the content management features you see in our web app and lets you extend them for use in your own app. It strives to be RESTful and is organized around the main resources you’re familiar with from the Box web interface.

HackPad

Hackpad is a smart collaborative workspace that your team will love.

Quip

Edit and discuss in one place. Quip combines documents with messages so you can work faster, on the web or on the go.

Nextcloud

A suite of client-server software for creating and using file hosting services The most deployed self-hosted file share and collaboration platform on the web. Access & collaborate across your devices.

ceph

In computing,It is a free-software storage platform, implements object storage on a single distributed computer cluster, and provides interfaces for object-, block- and file-level storage.

Google Docs

It is a word processor included as part of a free, web-based software office suite offered by Google. It brings your documents to life with smart editing and styling tools to help you easily format text and paragraphs.

OneDrive

Outlook.com is a free, personal email service from Microsoft. Keep your inbox clutter-free with powerful organizational tools, and collaborate easily with OneDrive and Office Online integration.

Dropmark

Dropmark offers super simple drag-and-drop file sharing, like a number of web apps before it, but if you want to use it for more you can create presentations, slideshows, and collaborate with others just as easily.

Related Comparisons

Amazon Zocalo vs SharePoint: What are the differences?

Storage location and ownership: Amazon Zocalo stores data in Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centers, while SharePoint primarily stores data on-premises or in Microsoft's cloud. Additionally, Amazon Zocalo gives users ownership of their data, meaning they can control who has access to their files, while SharePoint might have restrictions or limitations on ownership rights.
Collaboration features: Amazon Zocalo offers real-time collaboration features, allowing multiple users to edit documents simultaneously, while SharePoint may have limitations in this area. Zocalo includes features such as version tracking, comments, and notifications to enhance collaboration among team members.
Integration with other services: Amazon Zocalo integrates seamlessly with other AWS services such as WorkDocs, WorkMail, and WorkSpaces, providing a holistic productivity solution for users. In contrast, SharePoint can integrate with Microsoft 365 applications, but may not offer the same level of integration with third-party services.
Security and compliance: Amazon Zocalo offers robust security measures such as encryption, access controls, and audit logs to ensure data protection and compliance with industry regulations. SharePoint also provides security features, but Zocalo may have more advanced security options tailored for enterprise-level data protection.
Pricing model: Amazon Zocalo follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users only pay for the storage and features they use. On the other hand, SharePoint typically offers subscription-based pricing plans that may include bundled services, making it potentially more cost-effective for organizations with diverse needs.
Customization and scalability: Amazon Zocalo allows for customization through APIs and SDKs, enabling users to tailor the platform to their specific requirements. SharePoint also offers customization options, but Zocalo may have greater scalability potential due to its cloud-based architecture and flexibility in adapting to changing business needs.

Amazon Zocalo vs SharePoint

Overview