StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. Amazon S3 vs Openstack Swift

Amazon S3 vs Openstack Swift

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Stacks54.0K
Followers40.2K
Votes2.0K
Openstack Swift
Openstack Swift
Stacks33
Followers91
Votes0

Amazon S3 vs Openstack Swift: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Amazon S3 and Openstack Swift

Introduction:

In the realm of cloud storage solutions, Amazon S3 and Openstack Swift are two prominent options. While both offer object storage capabilities, there are significant differences between them that make them suitable for different use cases. This article aims to highlight the key distinctions between Amazon S3 and Openstack Swift.

  1. Architecture and Design: Amazon S3 is a proprietary cloud storage service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), while Openstack Swift is an open-source object storage system. This distinction means that S3 inherits all the benefits and limitations of a proprietary solution, such as vendor lock-in and limited customization options. On the other hand, Openstack Swift provides flexibility and freedom to customize and integrate it with other open-source tools and platforms.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Amazon S3 is known for its exceptional scalability and performance, offering virtually unlimited storage capacity and high data access speeds. It is optimized for handling massive workloads and reliably serving files to a large number of users. Openstack Swift also offers scalability, but it may require additional configuration and tuning to achieve the same level of performance and scalability as Amazon S3.

  3. Pricing and Cost Structure: Amazon S3 follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the amount of data stored and the volume of data transferred. It offers various storage classes with different price points to optimize costs. Openstack Swift, being an open-source solution, does not have a direct pricing model. However, it incurs costs related to infrastructure maintenance, support, and personnel required to manage and operate the storage system.

  4. Ecosystem and Integration: Amazon S3 has a well-established ecosystem and integrates seamlessly with other AWS services, making it an ideal choice for users already utilizing the AWS ecosystem. It offers compatibility with numerous third-party tools and libraries. Openstack Swift, being an open-source system, provides integration possibilities with a wide range of software and platforms beyond the Openstack ecosystem. It also allows customization and extensions to meet specific requirements.

  5. Data Protection and Security: Amazon S3 offers comprehensive built-in security features, including authentication, access control, and encryption options to protect data at rest and in transit. It also provides compliance certifications and auditing capabilities, ensuring data security and regulatory compliance. Openstack Swift offers similar security features but may require additional configuration and management to achieve the same level of security as Amazon S3.

  6. Community Support and Development: Amazon S3 benefits from the extensive resources and support provided by AWS, including regular updates, new feature releases, and strong community engagement. Openstack Swift, being an open-source project, benefits from the collaboration of a vibrant community of developers and users. However, the pace of development and availability of support can vary depending on the specific environment and user community.

In summary, the key differences between Amazon S3 and Openstack Swift lie in their architecture and design, scalability and performance, pricing and cost structure, ecosystem and integration possibilities, data protection and security, as well as community support and development.

Advice on Amazon S3, Openstack Swift

Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Openstack Swift
Openstack Swift

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

It is a highly available, distributed, eventually consistent object/blob store. Organizations can use Swift to store lots of data efficiently.

Write, read, and delete objects containing from 1 byte to 5 terabytes of data each. The number of objects you can store is unlimited.;Each object is stored in a bucket and retrieved via a unique, developer-assigned key.;A bucket can be stored in one of several Regions. You can choose a Region to optimize for latency, minimize costs, or address regulatory requirements. Amazon S3 is currently available in the US Standard, US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), South America (Sao Paulo), and GovCloud (US) Regions. The US Standard Region automatically routes requests to facilities in Northern Virginia or the Pacific Northwest using network maps.;Objects stored in a Region never leave the Region unless you transfer them out. For example, objects stored in the EU (Ireland) Region never leave the EU.;Authentication mechanisms are provided to ensure that data is kept secure from unauthorized access. Objects can be made private or public, and rights can be granted to specific users.;Options for secure data upload/download and encryption of data at rest are provided for additional data protection.;Uses standards-based REST and SOAP interfaces designed to work with any Internet-development toolkit.;Built to be flexible so that protocol or functional layers can easily be added. The default download protocol is HTTP. A BitTorrent protocol interface is provided to lower costs for high-scale distribution.;Provides functionality to simplify manageability of data through its lifetime. Includes options for segregating data by buckets, monitoring and controlling spend, and automatically archiving data to even lower cost storage options. These options can be easily administered from the Amazon S3 Management Console.;Reliability backed with the Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement.
Distributed; consistent; Object/blob store
Statistics
Stacks
54.0K
Stacks
33
Followers
40.2K
Followers
91
Votes
2.0K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 590
    Reliable
  • 492
    Scalable
  • 456
    Cheap
  • 329
    Simple & easy
  • 83
    Many sdks
Cons
  • 7
    Permissions take some time to get right
  • 6
    Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly
  • 6
    Requires a credit card
  • 3
    Complex to set up
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3, Openstack Swift?

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase