Amazon S3 vs GitHub Pages

Overview

Amazon S3

Stacks55.1K

Followers40.2K

Votes2.0K

GitHub Pages

Stacks17.7K

Followers13.0K

Votes1.1K

Amazon S3 vs GitHub Pages: What are the differences?

Introduction: Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages are two popular web hosting services, but they differ in several key aspects. In this Markdown code, we will provide a concise overview of the key differences between Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages.

Pricing Model: Amazon S3 offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on storage, data transfer, and requests made, which can be cost-effective for large-scale applications. On the other hand, GitHub Pages provides free hosting for static websites and repositories, making it an attractive option for personal projects or smaller websites with limited traffic.
Platform Integration: Amazon S3 is a standalone cloud storage service, allowing developers to store and retrieve any kind of data. It can be integrated with other AWS services and provides advanced features like object versioning and lifecycle policies. In contrast, GitHub Pages is tightly integrated with GitHub repositories, offering seamless deployment of static websites directly from the repository, providing a streamlined workflow for developers.
Custom Domain Support: Both Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages support custom domain mapping, allowing websites to use a personalized domain name. However, Amazon S3 requires additional configuration steps to set up a custom domain, while GitHub Pages simplifies the process by automatically setting up SSL certificates for custom domains.
Collaboration and Version Control: GitHub Pages has strong collaboration features built-in, as it is closely tied to the Git version control system. This enables team collaboration, pull requests, and automatic deployment of changes made to the repository. Amazon S3, being a cloud storage service, does not provide built-in collaboration features or version control functionalities.
Advanced Functionality: Amazon S3 offers a wide range of advanced functionalities such as access control management, server-side encryption, event notifications, and content delivery through Amazon CloudFront. GitHub Pages, being focused on static website hosting, does not offer as many advanced features and is primarily geared towards simplicity and ease of use.
Scalability and Performance: Amazon S3 is designed to handle large amounts of data and scalable workloads, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications. It provides various performance optimizations like multi-part uploads and transfer acceleration. GitHub Pages, on the other hand, may not be as robust in terms of scalability and performance, making it more suitable for smaller websites or personal projects with lower traffic volumes.

In Summary, Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages differ in their pricing model, platform integration, support for custom domains, collaboration and version control features, advanced functionality, and scalability/performance capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Amazon S3, GitHub Pages

Howie

Full Stack Engineer at Yintrust

Aug 13, 2020

Decidedon

Netlify

We use Netlify to host static websites.

The reasons for choosing Netlify over GitHub Pages are as follows:

Netfily can bind multiple domain names, while GitHub Pages can only bind one domain name
With Netfily, the original repository can be private, while GitHub Pages free tier requires the original repository to be public

In addition, in order to use CDN, we use Netlify DNS.

238k views238k

Comments

Gabriel

CEO at NaoLogic Inc

Dec 24, 2019

Decided

We offer our customer HIPAA compliant storage. After analyzing the market, we decided to go with Google Storage. The Nodejs API is ok, still not ES6 and can be very confusing to use. For each new customer, we created a different bucket so they can have individual data and not have to worry about data loss. After 1000+ customers we started seeing many problems with the creation of new buckets, with saving or retrieving a new file. Many false positive: the Promise returned ok, but in reality, it failed.

That's why we switched to S3 that just works.

330k views330k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon S3	GitHub Pages
Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web	Public webpages hosted directly from your GitHub repository. Just edit, push, and your changes are live.
Write, read, and delete objects containing from 1 byte to 5 terabytes of data each. The number of objects you can store is unlimited.;Each object is stored in a bucket and retrieved via a unique, developer-assigned key.;A bucket can be stored in one of several Regions. You can choose a Region to optimize for latency, minimize costs, or address regulatory requirements. Amazon S3 is currently available in the US Standard, US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), South America (Sao Paulo), and GovCloud (US) Regions. The US Standard Region automatically routes requests to facilities in Northern Virginia or the Pacific Northwest using network maps.;Objects stored in a Region never leave the Region unless you transfer them out. For example, objects stored in the EU (Ireland) Region never leave the EU.;Authentication mechanisms are provided to ensure that data is kept secure from unauthorized access. Objects can be made private or public, and rights can be granted to specific users.;Options for secure data upload/download and encryption of data at rest are provided for additional data protection.;Uses standards-based REST and SOAP interfaces designed to work with any Internet-development toolkit.;Built to be flexible so that protocol or functional layers can easily be added. The default download protocol is HTTP. A BitTorrent protocol interface is provided to lower costs for high-scale distribution.;Provides functionality to simplify manageability of data through its lifetime. Includes options for segregating data by buckets, monitoring and controlling spend, and automatically archiving data to even lower cost storage options. These options can be easily administered from the Amazon S3 Management Console.;Reliability backed with the Amazon S3 Service Level Agreement.	Blogging with Jekyll; Custom URLs; Automatic Page Generator
Statistics
Stacks 55.1K	Stacks 17.7K
Followers 40.2K	Followers 13.0K
Votes 2.0K	Votes 1.1K
Pros & Cons
Pros 590 Reliable 492 Scalable 456 Cheap 329 Simple & easy 83 Many sdks Cons 7 Permissions take some time to get right 6 Requires a credit card 6 Takes time/work to organize buckets & folders properly 3 Complex to set up	Pros 290 Free 217 Right out of github 185 Quick to set up 108 Instant 107 Easy to learn Cons 4 Not possible to perform HTTP redirects 3 Limited Jekyll plugins 3 Supports only Jekyll 1 Jekyll is bloated
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub

What are some alternatives to Amazon S3, GitHub Pages?

DomainRacer

It is a blazing fast hosting solution that provides Customer Satisfaction driven Web Hosting services since 2016.

Netlify

Netlify is smart enough to process your site and make sure all assets gets optimized and served with perfect caching-headers from a cookie-less domain. We make sure your HTML is served straight from our CDN edge nodes without any round-trip to our backend servers and are the only ones to give you instant cache invalidation when you push a new deploy. Netlify is also the only static hosting service with integrated continuous deployment.

Vercel

A cloud platform for serverless deployment. It enables developers to host websites and web services that deploy instantly, scale automatically, and require no supervision, all with minimal configuration.

Amazon EBS

Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Surge

Surge makes it easy for developers to deploy projects to a production-quality CDN through Grunt, Gulp, npm.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Webflow

Webflow is a responsive design tool that lets you design, build, and publish websites in an intuitive interface. Clean code included!

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

Divshot

Divshot makes building and hosting front-end web applications simple. Build locally and deploy using a simple command-line interface. Divshot supports multiple environments, pushState routing, atomic deploys, and more.

Related Comparisons

Amazon S3 vs GitHub Pages: What are the differences?

Pricing Model: Amazon S3 offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model based on storage, data transfer, and requests made, which can be cost-effective for large-scale applications. On the other hand, GitHub Pages provides free hosting for static websites and repositories, making it an attractive option for personal projects or smaller websites with limited traffic.
Platform Integration: Amazon S3 is a standalone cloud storage service, allowing developers to store and retrieve any kind of data. It can be integrated with other AWS services and provides advanced features like object versioning and lifecycle policies. In contrast, GitHub Pages is tightly integrated with GitHub repositories, offering seamless deployment of static websites directly from the repository, providing a streamlined workflow for developers.
Custom Domain Support: Both Amazon S3 and GitHub Pages support custom domain mapping, allowing websites to use a personalized domain name. However, Amazon S3 requires additional configuration steps to set up a custom domain, while GitHub Pages simplifies the process by automatically setting up SSL certificates for custom domains.
Collaboration and Version Control: GitHub Pages has strong collaboration features built-in, as it is closely tied to the Git version control system. This enables team collaboration, pull requests, and automatic deployment of changes made to the repository. Amazon S3, being a cloud storage service, does not provide built-in collaboration features or version control functionalities.
Advanced Functionality: Amazon S3 offers a wide range of advanced functionalities such as access control management, server-side encryption, event notifications, and content delivery through Amazon CloudFront. GitHub Pages, being focused on static website hosting, does not offer as many advanced features and is primarily geared towards simplicity and ease of use.
Scalability and Performance: Amazon S3 is designed to handle large amounts of data and scalable workloads, making it suitable for high-traffic websites and applications. It provides various performance optimizations like multi-part uploads and transfer acceleration. GitHub Pages, on the other hand, may not be as robust in terms of scalability and performance, making it more suitable for smaller websites or personal projects with lower traffic volumes.

Amazon S3 vs GitHub Pages

Overview