Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon Rekognition vs Tesseract OCR: What are the differences?
Introduction
Amazon Rekognition and Tesseract OCR are two popular tools used for optical character recognition (OCR) tasks. Both have their own strengths and differences in terms of functionality and features. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between these two tools.
Accuracy and Confidence: One significant difference between Amazon Rekognition and Tesseract OCR lies in their accuracy and confidence levels. Amazon Rekognition, powered by advanced machine learning algorithms, tends to have higher accuracy rates and provides confidence scores for the recognized text. On the other hand, Tesseract OCR, while efficient, may have relatively lower accuracy, especially in cases with complex or distorted text.
Language Support: Another notable difference is the range of languages supported by each tool. Amazon Rekognition offers robust language support with a wide range of recognized languages, including regional dialects. It can accurately handle diverse text inputs from various languages. Tesseract OCR, although it supports multiple languages, may have limitations or inconsistencies in recognizing certain non-Latin characters or scripts.
Document Analysis and Layout: Amazon Rekognition goes beyond basic character recognition by offering document analysis and layout detection features. It can identify and extract information from structured documents like forms, invoices, or tables, providing valuable insights. Tesseract OCR, while excellent for text extraction, focuses primarily on character recognition and lacks advanced document analysis capabilities.
Cloud-based vs. On-premises: One significant difference lies in the deployment model. Amazon Rekognition is a cloud-based service, meaning it operates and stores data on remote servers. This enables scalability, accessibility, and eliminates the need for managing infrastructure. Tesseract OCR, however, is an open-source solution that needs to be installed and run locally, which gives users more control over their data but requires manual setup and maintenance.
Additional Image Analysis: Amazon Rekognition extends its functionality beyond OCR, offering additional image analysis capabilities. It can detect faces, objects, scenes, and perform visual search. This makes it useful for various image recognition tasks like image moderation, facial recognition, or content indexing. Tesseract OCR, being primarily focused on OCR, does not provide these advanced image analysis features.
Cost and Pricing Model: Lastly, the cost and pricing models differ between the two tools. Amazon Rekognition operates on a usage-based pricing model in the cloud, where you pay for the resources consumed and the features utilized. Tesseract OCR, being open-source, is free to use, but you need to manage the infrastructure and may have to invest in additional software or hardware components if required.
In summary, Amazon Rekognition offers higher accuracy, advanced document analysis, cloud-based deployment, additional image analysis capabilities, and a flexible pricing model, while Tesseract OCR provides a free, open-source solution, supports multiple languages, and allows for local control and customization.
AWS Rekognition has an OCR feature but can recognize only up to 50 words per image, which is a deal-breaker for us. (see my tweet).
Also, we discovered fantastic speed and quality improvements in the 4.x versions of Tesseract. Meanwhile, the quality of AWS Rekognition's OCR remains to be mediocre in comparison.
We run Tesseract serverlessly in AWS Lambda via aws-lambda-tesseract library that we made open-source.
Pros of Amazon Rekognition
- Integrate easily with AWS4
Pros of Tesseract OCR
- Building training set is easy5
- Very lightweight library2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon Rekognition
- AWS1
Cons of Tesseract OCR
- Works best with white background and black text1