Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon RDS

15.8K
10.7K
+ 1
761
Oracle

2.3K
1.7K
+ 1
113
Add tool

Amazon RDS vs Oracle: What are the differences?

Introduction

Amazon RDS and Oracle are two popular database management systems that offer different features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between Amazon RDS and Oracle can help organizations make informed decisions about their database management needs.

  1. Scalability: One key difference between Amazon RDS and Oracle is their scalability options. Amazon RDS provides automatic scalability where the database can be easily scaled up or down based on the workload. On the other hand, Oracle offers manual scalability options, requiring administrators to manually adjust resources as needed.

  2. Database Management: Another difference lies in the database management responsibilities. With Amazon RDS, much of the database management tasks such as backups, patching, and monitoring are taken care of by Amazon Web Services. Oracle, on the other hand, requires more manual administration and maintenance tasks to be performed by the database administrators.

  3. Pricing Model: The pricing model is also different between Amazon RDS and Oracle. Amazon RDS offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the resources they use. Oracle, on the other hand, follows a traditional licensing model with upfront costs and ongoing maintenance fees.

  4. Ease of Deployment: When it comes to deployment, Amazon RDS offers a more seamless and automated experience. It allows users to easily provision a new database instance within minutes, with all the necessary configurations already set up. Oracle requires more manual effort and configuration to set up a new database instance.

  5. Supported Databases: Amazon RDS supports a variety of databases apart from Oracle, such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Microsoft SQL Server, providing users with flexibility and choice. Oracle, on the other hand, is specifically designed for Oracle databases, restricting the choice of database platforms.

  6. Backup and Recovery: The backup and recovery mechanisms also differ between Amazon RDS and Oracle. Amazon RDS offers automatic backups and point-in-time recovery features, making it easier to restore data in case of an issue. Oracle offers backup and recovery options but requires more manual intervention from the administrators.

In Summary, Amazon RDS provides automatic scalability, takes care of database management tasks, follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, offers seamless deployment, supports multiple databases, and provides automated backup and recovery features. Oracle, on the other hand, offers manual scalability, requires more manual administration, follows a traditional licensing model, requires manual deployment configuration, supports only Oracle databases, and offers backup and recovery options with more manual intervention.

Decisions about Amazon RDS and Oracle
Daniel Moya
Data Engineer at Dimensigon · | 4 upvotes · 460.7K views

We have chosen Tibero over Oracle because we want to offer a PL/SQL-as-a-Service that the users can deploy in any Cloud without concerns from our website at some standard cost. With Oracle Database, developers would have to worry about what they implement and the related costs of each feature but the licensing model from Tibero is just 1 price and we have all features included, so we don't have to worry and developers using our SQLaaS neither. PostgreSQL would be open source. We have chosen Tibero over Oracle because we want to offer a PL/SQL that you can deploy in any Cloud without concerns. PostgreSQL would be the open source option but we need to offer an SQLaaS with encryption and more enterprise features in the background and best value option we have found, it was Tibero Database for PL/SQL-based applications.

See more

We wanted a JSON datastore that could save the state of our bioinformatics visualizations without destructive normalization. As a leading NoSQL data storage technology, MongoDB has been a perfect fit for our needs. Plus it's open source, and has an enterprise SLA scale-out path, with support of hosted solutions like Atlas. Mongo has been an absolute champ. So much so that SQL and Oracle have begun shipping JSON column types as a new feature for their databases. And when Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) announced support for JSON, we basically had our FHIR datalake technology.

See more

In the field of bioinformatics, we regularly work with hierarchical and unstructured document data. Unstructured text data from PDFs, image data from radiographs, phylogenetic trees and cladograms, network graphs, streaming ECG data... none of it fits into a traditional SQL database particularly well. As such, we prefer to use document oriented databases.

MongoDB is probably the oldest component in our stack besides Javascript, having been in it for over 5 years. At the time, we were looking for a technology that could simply cache our data visualization state (stored in JSON) in a database as-is without any destructive normalization. MongoDB was the perfect tool; and has been exceeding expectations ever since.

Trivia fact: some of the earliest electronic medical records (EMRs) used a document oriented database called MUMPS as early as the 1960s, prior to the invention of SQL. MUMPS is still in use today in systems like Epic and VistA, and stores upwards of 40% of all medical records at hospitals. So, we saw MongoDB as something as a 21st century version of the MUMPS database.

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Amazon RDS
Pros of Oracle
  • 165
    Reliable failovers
  • 156
    Automated backups
  • 130
    Backed by amazon
  • 92
    Db snapshots
  • 87
    Multi-availability
  • 30
    Control iops, fast restore to point of time
  • 28
    Security
  • 24
    Elastic
  • 20
    Push-button scaling
  • 20
    Automatic software patching
  • 4
    Replication
  • 3
    Reliable
  • 2
    Isolation
  • 44
    Reliable
  • 33
    Enterprise
  • 15
    High Availability
  • 5
    Hard to maintain
  • 5
    Expensive
  • 4
    Maintainable
  • 4
    Hard to use
  • 3
    High complexity

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Amazon RDS
Cons of Oracle
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 14
      Expensive

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Amazon RDS?

    Amazon RDS gives you access to the capabilities of a familiar MySQL, Oracle or Microsoft SQL Server database engine. This means that the code, applications, and tools you already use today with your existing databases can be used with Amazon RDS. Amazon RDS automatically patches the database software and backs up your database, storing the backups for a user-defined retention period and enabling point-in-time recovery. You benefit from the flexibility of being able to scale the compute resources or storage capacity associated with your Database Instance (DB Instance) via a single API call.

    What is Oracle?

    Oracle Database is an RDBMS. An RDBMS that implements object-oriented features such as user-defined types, inheritance, and polymorphism is called an object-relational database management system (ORDBMS). Oracle Database has extended the relational model to an object-relational model, making it possible to store complex business models in a relational database.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Amazon RDS?
    What companies use Oracle?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Amazon RDS?
    What tools integrate with Oracle?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitHubDockerAmazon EC2+23
    12
    6605
    JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
    53
    22131
    DockerSlackAmazon EC2+17
    18
    6021
    What are some alternatives to Amazon RDS and Oracle?
    Amazon Redshift
    It is optimized for data sets ranging from a few hundred gigabytes to a petabyte or more and costs less than $1,000 per terabyte per year, a tenth the cost of most traditional data warehousing solutions.
    Apache Aurora
    Apache Aurora is a service scheduler that runs on top of Mesos, enabling you to run long-running services that take advantage of Mesos' scalability, fault-tolerance, and resource isolation.
    MySQL
    The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
    Heroku Postgres
    Heroku Postgres provides a SQL database-as-a-service that lets you focus on building your application instead of messing around with database management.
    Google Cloud SQL
    Run the same relational databases you know with their rich extension collections, configuration flags and developer ecosystem, but without the hassle of self management.
    See all alternatives