StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Containers As A Service
  5. Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Docker Swarm

Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Docker Swarm

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Stacks14.6K
Followers10.2K
Votes325
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm
Stacks779
Followers990
Votes282

Amazon EC2 Container Service vs Docker Swarm: What are the differences?

Introduction In this article, we will compare Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) with Docker Swarm, two popular container orchestration platforms. We will highlight the key differences between the two, focusing on six specific points.

1. Scalability: Amazon ECS provides a highly scalable container management service that can effortlessly scale applications based on workload demands. It integrates well with Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling, allowing automatic scaling based on predefined policies and metrics. On the other hand, Docker Swarm lacks the built-in scalability features of ECS and requires manual configuration for scaling.

2. Load Balancing: One of the key differences between ECS and Docker Swarm is their approach to load balancing. ECS provides an integrated load balancing service known as Elastic Load Balancer (ELB). ELB can distribute traffic across containers and automatically detect unhealthy instances. In contrast, Docker Swarm relies on external load balancing solutions like HAProxy to distribute traffic among containers.

3. Support for Multi-Region Deployment: Amazon ECS offers native support for multi-region deployments through the use of Amazon EC2 instances in different availability zones. This enables applications to be highly available across multiple regions. Docker Swarm, on the other hand, primarily focuses on managing containers within a single cluster and does not have built-in support for multi-region deployments.

4. Integration with AWS Services: As a part of the Amazon Web Services (AWS) ecosystem, ECS seamlessly integrates with various AWS services like IAM, CloudFormation, CloudWatch, and more. This allows for easier management and monitoring of containerized applications. Docker Swarm, being an open-source platform, may require additional effort to integrate with other AWS services.

5. Container Orchestration Features: ECS and Docker Swarm have different approaches to container orchestration. ECS is a managed service that abstracts away the complexity of managing infrastructure and offers integrated features like task scheduling, service discovery, and container health monitoring. Docker Swarm, on the other hand, provides a simple, lightweight orchestration solution that focuses on ease of use and minimal setup. It may require additional tools or configurations for advanced orchestration features.

6. Vendor Lock-In: Using Amazon ECS requires utilizing AWS infrastructure and services, which can lead to vendor lock-in for containerized applications. Docker Swarm, being an open-source solution, provides more flexibility and portability as it can be run on any infrastructure that supports Docker. This makes it easier to migrate applications between different environments or cloud providers.

Summary: In summary, Amazon EC2 Container Service (ECS) offers better scalability, integrated load balancing, multi-region deployment support, and seamless integration with other AWS services. Docker Swarm, on the other hand, provides a lightweight and flexible container orchestration solution that minimizes vendor lock-in. The choice between ECS and Docker Swarm depends on specific requirements, complexity, and level of integration needed for containerized applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon EC2 Container Service, Docker Swarm

Simon
Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 27, 2020

DecidedonGitHubGitHubGitHub PagesGitHub PagesMarkdownMarkdown

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

  • @{GitHub}|tool:27| (incl. @{GitHub Pages}|tool:683|/@{Markdown}|tool:1147| for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
  • Respectively @{Git}|tool:1046| as revision control system
  • @{SourceTree}|tool:1599| as @{Git}|tool:1046| GUI
  • @{Visual Studio Code}|tool:4202| as IDE
  • @{CircleCI}|tool:190| for continuous integration (automatize development process)
  • @{Prettier}|tool:7035| / @{TSLint}|tool:5561| / @{ESLint}|tool:3337| as code linter
  • @{SonarQube}|tool:2638| as quality gate
  • @{Docker}|tool:586| as container management (incl. @{Docker Compose}|tool:3136| for multi-container application management)
  • @{VirtualBox}|tool:774| for operating system simulation tests
  • @{Kubernetes}|tool:1885| as cluster management for docker containers
  • @{Heroku}|tool:133| for deploying in test environments
  • @{nginx}|tool:1052| as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
  • @{SSLMate}|tool:2752| (using @{OpenSSL}|tool:3091|) for certificate management
  • @{Amazon EC2}|tool:18| (incl. @{Amazon S3}|tool:25|) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
  • @{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| as preferred database system
  • @{Redis}|tool:1031| as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

  • Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
  • Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
  • Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
  • Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
  • Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
  • Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
12.8M views12.8M
Comments
Andres
Andres

Lead Senior Software Engineer at InTouch Technology

Jun 3, 2020

Decided

If you want to integrate your cluster and control end to end your pipeline with AWS tools like ECR and Code Pipeline your best option is ECS using a EC2 instance. There are pros and cons but it's easier to integrate using cloud formation templates and visual UI for approvals, etc. ECS is free, you need to pay only for the EC2 instance but unfortunately, it is not standard then you cannot use standard tools to see and manage your Kubernetes.
EKS in the other hand uses standard Kubernates definitions but you need to pay for the service and also for the EC2 instance(s) you have in your cluster.

91.7k views91.7k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon EC2 Container Service
Amazon EC2 Container Service
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm

Amazon EC2 Container Service lets you launch and stop container-enabled applications with simple API calls, allows you to query the state of your cluster from a centralized service, and gives you access to many familiar Amazon EC2 features like security groups, EBS volumes and IAM roles.

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Docker Compatibility;Managed Clusters;Programmatic Control;Task Definitions;Scheduler;Docker Repository
-
Statistics
Stacks
14.6K
Stacks
779
Followers
10.2K
Followers
990
Votes
325
Votes
282
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 100
    Backed by amazon
  • 72
    Familiar to ec2
  • 53
    Cluster based
  • 42
    Simple API
  • 26
    Iam roles
Pros
  • 55
    Docker friendly
  • 46
    Easy to setup
  • 40
    Standard Docker API
  • 38
    Easy to use
  • 23
    Native
Cons
  • 9
    Low adoption
Integrations
Docker
Docker
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Docker
Docker

What are some alternatives to Amazon EC2 Container Service, Docker Swarm?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Tutum

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Google Kubernetes Engine

Google Kubernetes Engine

Container Engine takes care of provisioning and maintaining the underlying virtual machine cluster, scaling your application, and operational logistics like logging, monitoring, and health management.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

Containerum

Containerum

Containerum is built to aid cluster management, teamwork and resource allocation. Containerum runs on top of any Kubernetes cluster and provides a friendly Web UI for cluster management.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana