Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Amazon EBS

668
537
+ 1
82
Rook

52
101
+ 1
4
Add tool

Amazon EBS vs Rook: What are the differences?

Comparison Between Amazon EBS and Rook

Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Rook are two popular storage solutions used in cloud computing environments. While both offer capabilities for managing storage resources, there are some key differences between the two.

  1. Deployment Method: Amazon EBS is a managed service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS) and is tightly integrated with their cloud platform. It offers a simple and straightforward way to provision and attach block-level storage volumes to EC2 instances. On the other hand, Rook is an open-source storage orchestrator that allows you to dynamically provision and manage block, file, and object storage in various environments such as Kubernetes and OpenShift. Rook provides a more flexible and extensible approach, as it can support different storage providers.

  2. Platform Support: Another significant difference between Amazon EBS and Rook is the platform support they offer. Amazon EBS is primarily designed for use within the AWS ecosystem and is tightly integrated with other AWS services. It is not easily portable to other cloud providers or on-premises environments. In contrast, Rook is designed to be cloud-agnostic and can be used in multiple platforms that support Kubernetes or OpenShift, including both public and private clouds. This allows for greater flexibility in choosing the underlying infrastructure.

  3. Storage Persistence: When it comes to storage persistence, Amazon EBS uses AWS-provided backend storage, which ensures high durability and availability. EBS volumes are designed for long-term usage and retain the data even when there is no associated EC2 instance. On the other hand, Rook leverages the underlying storage infrastructure, which can vary based on the platform and configuration. While it can provide persistence, the level of durability and availability may depend on the chosen storage provider and configuration.

  4. Management and Configuration: The management and configuration of Amazon EBS volumes are handled through the AWS Management Console, command-line interface, or API calls. It provides a unified interface for provisioning, resizing, and snapshotting volumes. Rook, on the other hand, utilizes Kubernetes or OpenShift's native management and configuration capabilities. This means that storage management tasks can be performed using familiar tools and workflows already in place.

  5. Integration with Services: As mentioned earlier, Amazon EBS is closely integrated with other AWS services, allowing for seamless integration with EC2 instances, AWS Elastic Kubernetes Service (EKS), and other AWS resources. It offers features like bootable volumes and integration with Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling. Rook, on the other hand, integrates with Kubernetes or OpenShift platforms and provides a more generic storage management layer. It is not tightly coupled with any specific cloud provider or service.

  6. Pricing Model: Lastly, the pricing models of Amazon EBS and Rook differ. Amazon EBS follows a pay-as-you-go model, where you pay for the provisioned storage volume, along with any additional features like snapshots and data transfer. The cost is based on the volume capacity and the provisioned IOPS (input/output operations per second). On the other hand, Rook being an open-source solution, doesn't have a direct cost associated with it. You may need to consider the costs associated with the underlying storage provider and infrastructure.

In Summary, Amazon EBS is a managed service tightly integrated with AWS, providing simplicity and reliability, while Rook is an open-source storage orchestrator that offers flexibility and platform independence by leveraging Kubernetes and OpenShift capabilities.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Amazon EBS
Pros of Rook
  • 36
    Point-in-time snapshots
  • 27
    Data reliability
  • 19
    Configurable i/o performance
  • 3
    Minio Integration
  • 1
    Open Source

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Amazon EBS
Cons of Rook
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 2
      Ceph is difficult
    • 1
      Slow

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Amazon EBS?

    Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.

    What is Rook?

    It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Amazon EBS?
    What companies use Rook?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Amazon EBS or Rook.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Amazon EBS?
    What tools integrate with Rook?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to Amazon EBS and Rook?
    Amazon EFS
    Amazon EFS is easy to use and offers a simple interface that allows you to create and configure file systems quickly and easily. With Amazon EFS, storage capacity is elastic, growing and shrinking automatically as you add and remove files.
    Amazon S3
    Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web
    Google Cloud Storage
    Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.
    Azure Storage
    Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.
    Minio
    Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License
    See all alternatives