Amazon EBS vs Openstack Swift

Overview

Amazon EBS

Stacks650

Followers542

Votes82

Openstack Swift

Stacks33

Followers91

Votes0

Amazon EBS vs Openstack Swift: What are the differences?

Introduction: When considering storage solutions for cloud-based systems, Amazon EBS and Openstack Swift are two popular options. Understanding their key differences can help in choosing the most suitable solution for your specific requirements.

Architecture: Amazon EBS is block-level storage while Openstack Swift is object-based storage. This means that EBS provides storage volumes that can be attached to EC2 instances, functioning like traditional hard drives, whereas Swift stores data as objects, enabling scalability and flexibility in managing large amounts of unstructured data.
Scalability: Amazon EBS provides scalability by allowing users to increase or decrease the size of their storage volumes on the fly. In contrast, Openstack Swift offers scalability by distributing data across multiple nodes, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance.
Data Redundancy: Amazon EBS automatically replicates data within its availability zone for redundancy, ensuring data durability in case of hardware failures. On the other hand, Openstack Swift uses data replication and erasure coding techniques to provide data redundancy across different zones or regions.
Access Control: Amazon EBS offers access control at the storage volume level, allowing users to set permissions based on their specific requirements. Openstack Swift provides access control at the container and object level, enabling more fine-grained control over data access.
API Support: Amazon EBS uses APIs that are specific to the AWS ecosystem, making integration with other cloud services seamless. Openstack Swift offers a RESTful API, enabling compatibility with various programming languages and platforms, ensuring flexibility in development and deployment.
Cost: Amazon EBS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the storage volumes they provision. Openstack Swift, being open-source software, eliminates licensing fees but may incur costs for infrastructure and maintenance.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Amazon EBS and Openstack Swift, such as architecture, scalability, data redundancy, access control, API support, and cost, can help in selecting the most suitable storage solution for cloud-based systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Amazon EBS	Openstack Swift
Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.	It is a highly available, distributed, eventually consistent object/blob store. Organizations can use Swift to store lots of data efficiently.
Amazon EBS allows you to create storage volumes from 1 GB to 1 TB that can be mounted as devices by Amazon EC2 instances. Multiple volumes can be mounted to the same instance.;Amazon EBS enables you to provision a specific level of I/O performance if desired, by choosing a Provisioned IOPS volume. This allows you to predictably scale to thousands of IOPS per Amazon EC2 instance.;Storage volumes behave like raw, unformatted block devices, with user supplied device names and a block device interface. You can create a file system on top of Amazon EBS volumes, or use them in any other way you would use a block device (like a hard drive).;Amazon EBS volumes are placed in a specific Availability Zone, and can then be attached to instances also in that same Availability Zone.;Each storage volume is automatically replicated within the same Availability Zone. This prevents data loss due to failure of any single hardware component.;Amazon EBS also provides the ability to create point-in-time snapshots of volumes, which are persisted to Amazon S3. These snapshots can be used as the starting point for new Amazon EBS volumes, and protect data for long-term durability. The same snapshot can be used to instantiate as many volumes as you wish. These snapshots can be copied across AWS regions, making it easier to leverage multiple AWS regions for geographical expansion, data center migration and disaster recovery.;AWS also enables you to create new volumes from AWS hosted public data sets.;Amazon CloudWatch exposes performance metrics for EBS volumes, giving you insight into bandwidth, throughput, latency, and queue depth. The metrics are accessible via the AWS CloudWatch API or the AWS Management Console. For more details, see Amazon CloudWatch.	Distributed; consistent; Object/blob store
Statistics
Stacks 650	Stacks 33
Followers 542	Followers 91
Votes 82	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 36 Point-in-time snapshots 27 Data reliability 19 Configurable i/o performance	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Amazon EBS, Openstack Swift?

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

Minio

Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

Related Comparisons

Amazon EBS vs Openstack Swift: What are the differences?

Architecture: Amazon EBS is block-level storage while Openstack Swift is object-based storage. This means that EBS provides storage volumes that can be attached to EC2 instances, functioning like traditional hard drives, whereas Swift stores data as objects, enabling scalability and flexibility in managing large amounts of unstructured data.
Scalability: Amazon EBS provides scalability by allowing users to increase or decrease the size of their storage volumes on the fly. In contrast, Openstack Swift offers scalability by distributing data across multiple nodes, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance.
Data Redundancy: Amazon EBS automatically replicates data within its availability zone for redundancy, ensuring data durability in case of hardware failures. On the other hand, Openstack Swift uses data replication and erasure coding techniques to provide data redundancy across different zones or regions.
Access Control: Amazon EBS offers access control at the storage volume level, allowing users to set permissions based on their specific requirements. Openstack Swift provides access control at the container and object level, enabling more fine-grained control over data access.
API Support: Amazon EBS uses APIs that are specific to the AWS ecosystem, making integration with other cloud services seamless. Openstack Swift offers a RESTful API, enabling compatibility with various programming languages and platforms, ensuring flexibility in development and deployment.
Cost: Amazon EBS follows a pay-as-you-go pricing model, where users are charged based on the storage volumes they provision. Openstack Swift, being open-source software, eliminates licensing fees but may incur costs for infrastructure and maintenance.

Amazon EBS vs Openstack Swift

Overview