Amazon EBS vs Minio

Overview

Amazon EBS

Stacks650

Followers542

Votes82

Minio

Stacks638

Followers670

Votes43

GitHub Stars57.8K

Forks6.4K

Amazon EBS vs Minio: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Minio.

Scalability: One of the key differences between Amazon EBS and Minio is their scalability. Amazon EBS can automatically scale its capacity based on the workload, making it suitable for high-demand applications. On the other hand, Minio provides scalability by allowing users to add more servers and distribute data across them, enabling horizontal scaling.
Cost: When it comes to cost, Amazon EBS charges users based on the provisioned storage capacity. This means users have to pay for the allocated storage even if they are not fully utilizing it. On the other hand, Minio is an open-source object storage platform that does not have any upfront costs or vendor lock-in, making it more cost-effective for certain use cases.
Data Protection: Another difference between Amazon EBS and Minio lies in their data protection mechanisms. Amazon EBS offers snapshot capabilities that allow users to create incremental backups of their data, providing a reliable data protection solution. In contrast, Minio relies on its distributed architecture and erasure coding to protect data across multiple servers, ensuring high availability and data durability.
Storage Durability: In terms of storage durability, Amazon EBS replicates data within the same Availability Zone (AZ) automatically. This replication mechanism ensures high durability for data stored on Amazon EBS. However, Minio offers more flexibility in terms of durability by allowing users to choose the number of servers they want to distribute data across, providing customizable storage durability options.
Data Accessibility: Amazon EBS is designed for use within the Amazon Web Services (AWS) ecosystem, making it easily accessible for applications running on AWS services. Conversely, Minio provides a standalone object storage solution that can be accessed via various protocols like S3, NFS, and HTTP. This flexibility allows applications to access data stored in Minio from different environments and platforms.
Integration and Ecosystem: Another difference lies in the integration and ecosystem support. Amazon EBS seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, enabling users to leverage a wide range of complementary services within the AWS ecosystem. On the other hand, Minio is compatible with the S3 API, making it compatible with various S3-compatible tools and libraries, providing a wider ecosystem of integrations outside the AWS ecosystem.

In summary, the key differences between Amazon EBS and Minio include scalability, cost, data protection mechanisms, storage durability options, data accessibility, and integration/ecosystem support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Amazon EBS, Minio

Dalton

Oct 23, 2020

Decided

Minio is a free and open source object storage system. It can be self-hosted and is S3 compatible. During the early stage it would save cost and allow us to move to a different object storage when we scale up. It is also fast and easy to set up. This is very useful during development since it can be run on localhost.

143k views143k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon EBS	Minio
Amazon EBS volumes are network-attached, and persist independently from the life of an instance. Amazon EBS provides highly available, highly reliable, predictable storage volumes that can be attached to a running Amazon EC2 instance and exposed as a device within the instance. Amazon EBS is particularly suited for applications that require a database, file system, or access to raw block level storage.	Minio is an object storage server compatible with Amazon S3 and licensed under Apache 2.0 License
Amazon EBS allows you to create storage volumes from 1 GB to 1 TB that can be mounted as devices by Amazon EC2 instances. Multiple volumes can be mounted to the same instance.;Amazon EBS enables you to provision a specific level of I/O performance if desired, by choosing a Provisioned IOPS volume. This allows you to predictably scale to thousands of IOPS per Amazon EC2 instance.;Storage volumes behave like raw, unformatted block devices, with user supplied device names and a block device interface. You can create a file system on top of Amazon EBS volumes, or use them in any other way you would use a block device (like a hard drive).;Amazon EBS volumes are placed in a specific Availability Zone, and can then be attached to instances also in that same Availability Zone.;Each storage volume is automatically replicated within the same Availability Zone. This prevents data loss due to failure of any single hardware component.;Amazon EBS also provides the ability to create point-in-time snapshots of volumes, which are persisted to Amazon S3. These snapshots can be used as the starting point for new Amazon EBS volumes, and protect data for long-term durability. The same snapshot can be used to instantiate as many volumes as you wish. These snapshots can be copied across AWS regions, making it easier to leverage multiple AWS regions for geographical expansion, data center migration and disaster recovery.;AWS also enables you to create new volumes from AWS hosted public data sets.;Amazon CloudWatch exposes performance metrics for EBS volumes, giving you insight into bandwidth, throughput, latency, and queue depth. The metrics are accessible via the AWS CloudWatch API or the AWS Management Console. For more details, see Amazon CloudWatch.	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 57.8K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 6.4K
Stacks 650	Stacks 638
Followers 542	Followers 670
Votes 82	Votes 43
Pros & Cons
Pros 36 Point-in-time snapshots 27 Data reliability 19 Configurable i/o performance	Pros 10 Store and Serve Resumes & Job Description PDF, Backups 8 S3 Compatible 4 Open Source 4 Simple 3 Encryption and Tamper-Proof Cons 3 Deletion of huge buckets is not possible
Integrations
No integrations available	Amazon S3

What are some alternatives to Amazon EBS, Minio?

Amazon S3

Amazon Simple Storage Service provides a fully redundant data storage infrastructure for storing and retrieving any amount of data, at any time, from anywhere on the web

Google Cloud Storage

Google Cloud Storage allows world-wide storing and retrieval of any amount of data and at any time. It provides a simple programming interface which enables developers to take advantage of Google's own reliable and fast networking infrastructure to perform data operations in a secure and cost effective manner. If expansion needs arise, developers can benefit from the scalability provided by Google's infrastructure.

Azure Storage

Azure Storage provides the flexibility to store and retrieve large amounts of unstructured data, such as documents and media files with Azure Blobs; structured nosql based data with Azure Tables; reliable messages with Azure Queues, and use SMB based Azure Files for migrating on-premises applications to the cloud.

OpenEBS

OpenEBS allows you to treat your persistent workload containers, such as DBs on containers, just like other containers. OpenEBS itself is deployed as just another container on your host.

Rackspace Cloud Files

Cloud Files, powered by OpenStack®, provides an easy to use online storage for files and media which can be delivered globally at blazing speeds over Akamai's content delivery network (CDN).

Storj

It is an open source, decentralized file storage solution. It uses encryption, file sharing, and a blockchain-based hash table to store files on a peer-to-peer network. The goal is to make cloud file storage faster, cheaper, and private.

RunAbove

We give you full access to the OpenStack API, which our compute (Nova) and storage (Swift) solutions are based on. This means no provider lock-in and easy automation of all your deployments. You can also manage your account and billing details via our RESTful API. You can choose between Horizon or OVH's easy-to-use web panel.

DigitalOcean Spaces

DigitalOcean Spaces are designed to make it easy and cost effective to store and serve massive amounts of data. Spaces are ideal for storing static, unstructured data like audio, video, and images as well as large amounts of text.

Rook

It is an open source cloud-native storage orchestrator for Kubernetes, providing the platform, framework, and support for a diverse set of storage solutions to natively integrate with cloud-native environments.

DigitalOcean Block Storage

Add more storage space, mix and match compute and storage to suit your database, file storage, application, service, mobile, and backup needs.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Amazon EBS vs Minio: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between Amazon Elastic Block Store (EBS) and Minio.

Scalability: One of the key differences between Amazon EBS and Minio is their scalability. Amazon EBS can automatically scale its capacity based on the workload, making it suitable for high-demand applications. On the other hand, Minio provides scalability by allowing users to add more servers and distribute data across them, enabling horizontal scaling.
Cost: When it comes to cost, Amazon EBS charges users based on the provisioned storage capacity. This means users have to pay for the allocated storage even if they are not fully utilizing it. On the other hand, Minio is an open-source object storage platform that does not have any upfront costs or vendor lock-in, making it more cost-effective for certain use cases.
Data Protection: Another difference between Amazon EBS and Minio lies in their data protection mechanisms. Amazon EBS offers snapshot capabilities that allow users to create incremental backups of their data, providing a reliable data protection solution. In contrast, Minio relies on its distributed architecture and erasure coding to protect data across multiple servers, ensuring high availability and data durability.
Storage Durability: In terms of storage durability, Amazon EBS replicates data within the same Availability Zone (AZ) automatically. This replication mechanism ensures high durability for data stored on Amazon EBS. However, Minio offers more flexibility in terms of durability by allowing users to choose the number of servers they want to distribute data across, providing customizable storage durability options.
Data Accessibility: Amazon EBS is designed for use within the Amazon Web Services (AWS) ecosystem, making it easily accessible for applications running on AWS services. Conversely, Minio provides a standalone object storage solution that can be accessed via various protocols like S3, NFS, and HTTP. This flexibility allows applications to access data stored in Minio from different environments and platforms.
Integration and Ecosystem: Another difference lies in the integration and ecosystem support. Amazon EBS seamlessly integrates with other AWS services, enabling users to leverage a wide range of complementary services within the AWS ecosystem. On the other hand, Minio is compatible with the S3 API, making it compatible with various S3-compatible tools and libraries, providing a wider ecosystem of integrations outside the AWS ecosystem.

In summary, the key differences between Amazon EBS and Minio include scalability, cost, data protection mechanisms, storage durability options, data accessibility, and integration/ecosystem support.