StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. NoSQL Databases
  4. NOSQL Database As A Service
  5. Amazon DynamoDB vs InfluxDB

Amazon DynamoDB vs InfluxDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Stacks4.0K
Followers3.2K
Votes195
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.2K
Votes175

Amazon DynamoDB vs InfluxDB: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Amazon DynamoDB and InfluxDB

  1. Data Model and Query Language: The most significant difference between Amazon DynamoDB and InfluxDB lies in their data model and query languages. DynamoDB is a NoSQL database that uses a key-value store approach, allowing efficient retrieval of data based on a primary key. In contrast, InfluxDB is a time-series database specifically designed for handling timestamped data, making it more suitable for storing and querying time-series data efficiently.

  2. Scalability and Performance: Both DynamoDB and InfluxDB offer horizontal scalability, but DynamoDB has the advantage of auto-scaling, where it automatically adjusts capacity based on usage patterns. InfluxDB also supports horizontal scalability but requires manual configuration of clusters. In terms of performance, DynamoDB is optimized for low-latency read and write operations, while InfluxDB excels in handling high influx rates and aggregating data efficiently.

  3. Indexing and Querying: DynamoDB primarily utilizes primary key-based querying for retrieving data, with support for secondary indexes. In contrast, InfluxDB employs a unique inverted index structure known as the time series index, enabling efficient queries on time ranges and fields. This indexing approach in InfluxDB allows complex time-series analytics, including aggregations and downsampling.

  4. Data Retention and Eviction Policies: In DynamoDB, data retention is managed by specifying the time-to-live (TTL) attribute on individual items, allowing automatic deletion of expired data. InfluxDB, being a time-series database, provides native support for data retention policies based on time intervals. This allows automatic removal of older data based on predefined time durations or maximum data sizes.

  5. Data Writes and Consistency: DynamoDB ensures strong consistency for read and write operations by default, resulting in higher latency. InfluxDB, on the other hand, provides eventual consistency, prioritizing high throughput and lower latency for write operations. This makes InfluxDB a more suitable choice for scenarios where real-time data ingestion and fast writes are crucial, such as IoT applications.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed cloud service provided by Amazon Web Services (AWS), offering excellent integration with other AWS services, extensive documentation, and a large user community. InfluxDB, as an open-source database, has an active community and a growing ecosystem. It also provides integration with various data visualization and monitoring tools like Grafana and Telegraf.

In summary, the key differences between Amazon DynamoDB and InfluxDB can be attributed to their data models, query languages, scalability, indexing approaches, data retention policies, and consistency models. Ultimately, the choice depends on specific requirements, with DynamoDB being suitable for general-purpose NoSQL use cases and InfluxDB tailored for time-series data analysis and storage.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon DynamoDB, InfluxDB

Doru
Doru

Solution Architect

Jun 9, 2019

ReviewonAmazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

I use Amazon DynamoDB because it integrates seamlessly with other AWS SaaS solutions and if cost is the primary concern early on, then this will be a better choice when compared to AWS RDS or any other solution that requires the creation of a HA cluster of IaaS components that will cost money just for being there, the costs not being influenced primarily by usage.

1.37k views1.37k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Apr 21, 2020

Needs advice

We are building an IOT service with heavy write throughput and fewer reads (we need downsampling records). We prefer to have good reliability when comes to data and prefer to have data retention based on policies.

So, we are looking for what is the best underlying DB for ingesting a lot of data and do queries easily

381k views381k
Comments
akash
akash

Aug 27, 2020

Needs adviceonCloud FirestoreCloud FirestoreFirebase Realtime DatabaseFirebase Realtime DatabaseAmazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

We are building a social media app, where users will post images, like their post, and make friends based on their interest. We are currently using Cloud Firestore and Firebase Realtime Database. We are looking for another database like Amazon DynamoDB; how much this decision can be efficient in terms of pricing and overhead?

199k views199k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
InfluxDB
InfluxDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Automated Storage Scaling – There is no limit to the amount of data you can store in a DynamoDB table, and the service automatically allocates more storage, as you store more data using the DynamoDB write APIs;Provisioned Throughput – When creating a table, simply specify how much request capacity you require. DynamoDB allocates dedicated resources to your table to meet your performance requirements, and automatically partitions data over a sufficient number of servers to meet your request capacity;Fully Distributed, Shared Nothing Architecture
Time-Centric Functions;Scalable Metrics; Events;Native HTTP API;Powerful Query Language;Built-in Explorer
Statistics
Stacks
4.0K
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
3.2K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
195
Votes
175
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Predictable performance and cost
  • 56
    Scalable
  • 35
    Native JSON Support
  • 21
    AWS Free Tier
  • 7
    Fast
Cons
  • 4
    Only sequential access for paginate data
  • 1
    Scaling
  • 1
    Document Limit Size
Pros
  • 59
    Time-series data analysis
  • 30
    Easy setup, no dependencies
  • 24
    Fast, scalable & open source
  • 21
    Open source
  • 20
    Real-time analytics
Cons
  • 4
    Instability
  • 1
    HA or Clustering is only in paid version
  • 1
    Proprietary query language
Integrations
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
Azure Database for MySQL
Azure Database for MySQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Amazon DynamoDB, InfluxDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase