StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. NoSQL Databases
  4. NOSQL Database As A Service
  5. Amazon DynamoDB vs Amazon SimpleDB

Amazon DynamoDB vs Amazon SimpleDB

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Stacks4.0K
Followers3.2K
Votes195
Amazon SimpleDB
Amazon SimpleDB
Stacks21
Followers50
Votes0

Amazon DynamoDB vs Amazon SimpleDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

Amazon DynamoDB and Amazon SimpleDB are both NoSQL databases offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS). While they are both designed to handle large volumes of data, there are key differences between these two services that make them suitable for different use cases. This article outlines the main differences between Amazon DynamoDB and Amazon SimpleDB.

  1. Scalability and Performance: One of the main differences between Amazon DynamoDB and Amazon SimpleDB is their scalability and performance capabilities. DynamoDB is designed to handle massive workloads and can scale horizontally across multiple servers to handle high read and write request rates. It also provides predictable performance with low latency, making it suitable for applications that require high throughput. On the other hand, SimpleDB is designed for smaller, less demanding workloads and does not scale as easily as DynamoDB.

  2. Data Model: Another major difference between DynamoDB and SimpleDB is their data model. DynamoDB is a key-value store, where each item in the database is uniquely identified by a primary key. It supports both single-item retrieval and batch retrieval, and also provides secondary indexes for flexible querying. SimpleDB, on the other hand, is a schemaless database that uses attributes to store data. Each item can have multiple attributes, and you can perform queries using the attributes as conditions.

  3. Consistency Model: Amazon DynamoDB and Amazon SimpleDB have different consistency models. DynamoDB offers both eventually consistent reads and strongly consistent reads. Eventually consistent reads are faster but may not always reflect the latest write operations. Strongly consistent reads ensure that you get the latest data, but may have higher latency. SimpleDB, on the other hand, only supports eventual consistency, so there may be a slight delay in getting the most up-to-date data.

  4. Size Limitations: While DynamoDB can handle large datasets, it has certain limitations on the size of individual items and the total amount of data you can store. Each item in DynamoDB can be up to 400 KB in size, and the maximum total size of all items in a table is 10 GB. In comparison, SimpleDB has a more restrictive limit of 1.1 MB for each item.

  5. Cost: The pricing structure for DynamoDB and SimpleDB also differs. DynamoDB charges for provisioned throughput, storage, and additional features like global tables. SimpleDB, on the other hand, charges based on the amount of data stored and the number of requests made. For smaller workloads, SimpleDB may be more cost-effective, while DynamoDB is better suited for high-scale applications where performance and scalability are critical.

  6. Query Capabilities: DynamoDB and SimpleDB have different query capabilities. DynamoDB supports rich query operations, including both primary key and secondary index queries, as well as conditional queries. It also provides a flexible Query API that allows you to specify filtering conditions. SimpleDB, on the other hand, has a simpler query model that supports basic querying using attributes as conditions.

In summary, Amazon DynamoDB is a highly scalable, performance-oriented NoSQL database that is suitable for large workloads and high throughput applications. It offers strong consistency, rich querying capabilities, and provides flexibility in data modeling. Amazon SimpleDB, on the other hand, is a more lightweight and cost-effective solution that is suitable for smaller workloads and simpler querying needs. It has limitations on scalability and performance, but offers eventual consistency and a simpler data model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon SimpleDB

Doru
Doru

Solution Architect

Jun 9, 2019

ReviewonAmazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

I use Amazon DynamoDB because it integrates seamlessly with other AWS SaaS solutions and if cost is the primary concern early on, then this will be a better choice when compared to AWS RDS or any other solution that requires the creation of a HA cluster of IaaS components that will cost money just for being there, the costs not being influenced primarily by usage.

1.34k views1.34k
Comments
akash
akash

Aug 27, 2020

Needs adviceonCloud FirestoreCloud FirestoreFirebase Realtime DatabaseFirebase Realtime DatabaseAmazon DynamoDBAmazon DynamoDB

We are building a social media app, where users will post images, like their post, and make friends based on their interest. We are currently using Cloud Firestore and Firebase Realtime Database. We are looking for another database like Amazon DynamoDB; how much this decision can be efficient in terms of pricing and overhead?

199k views199k
Comments
Eduardo
Eduardo

Software Engineer at Parrot Software, Inc.

Aug 24, 2021

Decided

CouchDB has proven us to be a reliable multi-master NoSQL JSON database built natively for the web.

We decided to use it over alternatives such as Firebase due topology, costs and frontend architecture.

Thanks to CouchDB we are now a frontend first CRM platform. We are capable of delivering and leveraging our frontend code to build most of our new functionalities directly within the frontend which we enrich through backend sidecars connected to each Parrot and each CouchDB.

13.3k views13.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon SimpleDB
Amazon SimpleDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Developers simply store and query data items via web services requests and Amazon SimpleDB does the rest. Behind the scenes, Amazon SimpleDB creates and manages multiple geographically distributed replicas of your data automatically to enable high availability and data durability. Amazon SimpleDB provides a simple web services interface to create and store multiple data sets, query your data easily, and return the results. Your data is automatically indexed, making it easy to quickly find the information that you need. There is no need to pre-define a schema or change a schema if new data is added later. And scale-out is as simple as creating new domains, rather than building out new servers.

Automated Storage Scaling – There is no limit to the amount of data you can store in a DynamoDB table, and the service automatically allocates more storage, as you store more data using the DynamoDB write APIs;Provisioned Throughput – When creating a table, simply specify how much request capacity you require. DynamoDB allocates dedicated resources to your table to meet your performance requirements, and automatically partitions data over a sufficient number of servers to meet your request capacity;Fully Distributed, Shared Nothing Architecture
<div>Amazon SimpleDB automatically manages infrastructure provisioning, hardware and software maintenance, replication and indexing of data items, and performance tuning.;Amazon SimpleDB automatically creates multiple geographically distributed copies of each data item you store.;You can also choose between consistent or eventually consistent read requests, gaining the flexibility to match read performance (latency and throughput) and consistency requirements to the demands of your application, or even disparate parts within your application.;A table in Amazon SimpleDB has a strict storage limitation of 10 GB and is limited in the request capacity it can achieve (typically under 25 writes/second). It is up to you to manage the partitioning and re-partitioning of your data over additional SimpleDB tables if you need additional scale.</div>
Statistics
Stacks
4.0K
Stacks
21
Followers
3.2K
Followers
50
Votes
195
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 62
    Predictable performance and cost
  • 56
    Scalable
  • 35
    Native JSON Support
  • 21
    AWS Free Tier
  • 7
    Fast
Cons
  • 4
    Only sequential access for paginate data
  • 1
    Scaling
  • 1
    Document Limit Size
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
Azure Database for MySQL
Azure Database for MySQL
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon SimpleDB?

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure Cosmos DB

Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore

Cloud Firestore is a NoSQL document database that lets you easily store, sync, and query data for your mobile and web apps - at global scale.

Cloudant

Cloudant

Cloudant’s distributed database as a service (DBaaS) allows developers of fast-growing web and mobile apps to focus on building and improving their products, instead of worrying about scaling and managing databases on their own.

Google Cloud Bigtable

Google Cloud Bigtable

Google Cloud Bigtable offers you a fast, fully managed, massively scalable NoSQL database service that's ideal for web, mobile, and Internet of Things applications requiring terabytes to petabytes of data. Unlike comparable market offerings, Cloud Bigtable doesn't require you to sacrifice speed, scale, or cost efficiency when your applications grow. Cloud Bigtable has been battle-tested at Google for more than 10 years—it's the database driving major applications such as Google Analytics and Gmail.

Google Cloud Datastore

Google Cloud Datastore

Use a managed, NoSQL, schemaless database for storing non-relational data. Cloud Datastore automatically scales as you need it and supports transactions as well as robust, SQL-like queries.

CloudBoost

CloudBoost

CloudBoost.io is a database service for the “next web” - that not only does data-storage, but also search, real-time and a whole lot more which enables developers to build much richer apps with 50% less time saving them a ton of cost and helping them go to market much faster.

Firebase Realtime Database

Firebase Realtime Database

It is a cloud-hosted NoSQL database that lets you store and sync data between your users in realtime. Data is synced across all clients in realtime, and remains available when your app goes offline.

restdb.io

restdb.io

RestDB is a NoSql document oriented database cloud service. Data is accessed as JSON objects via HTTPS. This gives great flexibility, easy system integration and future compatibility.

Amazon DocumentDB

Amazon DocumentDB

Amazon DocumentDB is a non-relational database service designed from the ground-up to give you the performance, scalability, and availability you need when operating mission-critical MongoDB workloads at scale. In Amazon DocumentDB, the storage and compute are decoupled, allowing each to scale independently, and you can increase the read capacity to millions of requests per second by adding up to 15 low latency read replicas in minutes, regardless of the size of your data.

Datomic Cloud

Datomic Cloud

A transactional database with a flexible data model, elastic scaling, and rich queries. Datomic is designed from the ground up to run on AWS. Datomic leverages AWS technology, including DynamoDB, S3, EFS, and CloudFormation to provide a fully integrated solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase