StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. AWS WAF vs Amazon Cognito

AWS WAF vs Amazon Cognito

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon Cognito
Amazon Cognito
Stacks616
Followers917
Votes34
AWS WAF
AWS WAF
Stacks164
Followers191
Votes0

AWS WAF vs Amazon Cognito: What are the differences?

## AWS WAF vs Amazon Cognito

AWS WAF and Amazon Cognito are both services offered by Amazon Web Services, yet they serve different purposes and cater to different needs in the cloud computing landscape. Below are the key differences between the two:

1. **Functionality**: AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall) primarily focuses on protecting web applications from common web exploits by filtering and monitoring HTTP/HTTPS traffic. On the other hand, Amazon Cognito is an identity management service that provides user authentication and authorization for mobile and web applications. While AWS WAF secures web applications, Amazon Cognito manages user identities.

2. **Use Case**: AWS WAF is commonly used to protect against common web exploits such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and other security threats at the application layer. In contrast, Amazon Cognito is often used to incorporate user sign-up, sign-in, and account management functionalities into applications, providing a seamless user experience across multiple devices.

3. **Integration**: AWS WAF can be seamlessly integrated with other AWS services such as Amazon CloudFront, AWS Application Load Balancer, and Amazon API Gateway to protect applications at scale. Amazon Cognito, on the other hand, integrates with external identity providers such as Google, Facebook, and Apple to offer social identity federation and seamless user authentication across platforms.

4. **Data Management**: While both services handle user data, they do so in different ways. Amazon Cognito securely stores user profile data and manages user authentication tokens for access control. In comparison, AWS WAF is focused on filtering and monitoring web traffic based on pre-configured rules and conditions to prevent malicious attacks.

5. **Scalability**: AWS WAF is highly scalable and can handle large volumes of web traffic, allowing organizations to protect their web applications effectively as traffic grows. Amazon Cognito provides scalable authentication and user management capabilities, making it easy to manage thousands to millions of users as applications scale.

In Summary, AWS WAF focuses on protecting web applications from common web exploits by filtering and monitoring HTTP/HTTPS traffic, while Amazon Cognito provides user authentication and authorization services for mobile and web applications, managing user identities and authentication tokens securely.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Amazon Cognito, AWS WAF

Brent
Brent

CEO at DEFY Labs

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

I started our team on Amazon Cognito because I was a Solutions Architect at AWS and found it really easy to follow the tutorials and get a basic app up and running with it.

When our team started working with it, they very quickly became frustrated because of the poor documentation. After 4 days of trying to get all the basic passwordless auth working, our lead engineer made the decision to abandon it and try Auth0... and managed to get everything implemented in 4 hours.

The consensus was that Cognito just isn't mature enough or well-documented, and that the implementation does not cater for real world use cases the way that it should. I believe Amplify has made some of this simpler, but I would still recommend Auth0 as it's been bulletproof for us, and is a sensible price.

297k views297k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Amazon Cognito
Amazon Cognito
AWS WAF
AWS WAF

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect your web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources.

Manage Unique Identities;Work Offline;Store and Sync across Devices;Seamless Guest Access;Safeguard AWS Credentials;Control Access to AWS Resources
-
Statistics
Stacks
616
Stacks
164
Followers
917
Followers
191
Votes
34
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 14
    Backed by Amazon
  • 7
    Manage Unique Identities
  • 4
    Work Offline
  • 3
    MFA
  • 2
    Store and Sync
Cons
  • 4
    Massive Pain to get working
  • 3
    Documentation often out of date
  • 2
    Login-UI sparsely customizable (e.g. no translation)
  • 1
    Difficult to customize (basic-pack is more than humble)
  • 1
    MFA: there is no "forget device" function
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Amazon Cognito, AWS WAF?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Let's Encrypt

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Sqreen

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope