StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. CDN
  4. Amazon CloudFront vs Azure Front Door

Amazon CloudFront vs Azure Front Door

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
Stacks21.5K
Followers10.8K
Votes935
Azure Front Door
Azure Front Door
Stacks23
Followers53
Votes0

Amazon CloudFront vs Azure Front Door: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will explore the key differences between Amazon CloudFront and Azure Front Door, two popular cloud-based content delivery networks (CDNs). Both services offer similar functionalities but have some distinct features that set them apart. Let's delve into the differences:

  1. Pricing Model: The pricing models of CloudFront and Front Door differ significantly. Amazon CloudFront charges based on multiple variables, including data transfer out, HTTP/HTTPS requests, and data transfer in from Regional Edge Caches. On the other hand, Azure Front Door includes a flat-rate pricing structure that covers both data transfer and HTTP/HTTPS requests. This means that Azure Front Door provides predictable costs, while Amazon CloudFront offers more granular pricing options.

  2. Regional Coverage: When it comes to regional coverage, Amazon CloudFront has a wider global presence compared to Azure Front Door. CloudFront operates in more edge locations worldwide, allowing for better content delivery and reduced latency. Azure Front Door, although expanding, currently supports fewer edge locations. So, if your audience is global, CloudFront may be a better choice.

  3. Integration with Cloud Services: Both CloudFront and Front Door seamlessly integrate with other cloud services offered by their respective providers. However, Amazon CloudFront provides more comprehensive integration options with various AWS services like Amazon S3, Amazon EC2, and Amazon CloudFront Functions. Azure Front Door, on the other hand, tightly integrates with Azure services such as Azure App Service, Azure Logic Apps, and Azure Functions. The choice between the two depends on your specific cloud ecosystem and requirements.

  4. Access Control and Security: When it comes to access control and security features, both services offer robust functionalities. However, Amazon CloudFront provides more advanced options such as field-level encryption and AWS Web Application Firewall (WAF). Azure Front Door, on the other hand, offers integration with Azure Web Application Firewall, allowing for application-level protection. Depending on your security needs, you can choose the CDN that aligns better with your requirements.

  5. Load Balancing Capabilities: Load balancing is crucial for optimal performance and high availability. While both CloudFront and Front Door provide load balancing features, there is a slight difference in their capabilities. Amazon CloudFront offers dynamic load balancing, allowing you to distribute traffic across multiple origins based on the health of those origins. Azure Front Door, on the other hand, provides load balancing but focuses more on routing and traffic management capabilities. Consider your specific load balancing requirements when selecting between the two CDNs.

  6. Platform Ecosystem: Lastly, another significant difference lies in the ecosystem of each CDN provider. Amazon CloudFront is part of the extensive AWS suite, which includes a vast range of cloud services for various purposes. On the other hand, Azure Front Door is part of the broader Microsoft Azure ecosystem, offering seamless integration with Azure services. Depending on your existing cloud architecture and preferred vendor, you may find one CDN provider's ecosystem more suitable for your needs.

In summary, Amazon CloudFront and Azure Front Door have key differences in their pricing models, regional coverage, integration capabilities, access control and security functionalities, load balancing features, and platform ecosystems. Choosing between the two CDNs depends on your specific requirements and preferences, whether it's cost predictability, global coverage, service integration, advanced security, load balancing, or aligning with your preferred cloud architecture.

Detailed Comparison

Amazon CloudFront
Amazon CloudFront
Azure Front Door
Azure Front Door

Amazon CloudFront can be used to deliver your entire website, including dynamic, static, streaming, and interactive content using a global network of edge locations. Requests for your content are automatically routed to the nearest edge location, so content is delivered with the best possible performance.

The scalable and secure entry point for the fast delivery of your global applications. It enables you to define, manage, and monitor the global routing for your web traffic by optimizing for best performance and instant global failover for high availability.

Fast- Using a network of edge locations around the world, Amazon CloudFront caches copies of your static content close to viewers, lowering latency when they download your objects and giving you the high, sustained data transfer rates needed to deliver large popular objects to end users at scale.;Simple- A single API call lets you get started distributing content from your Amazon S3 bucket or Amazon EC2 instance or other origin server through the Amazon CloudFront network.;Designed for use with other Amazon Web Services Amazon CloudFront is designed for use with other Amazon Web Services, including Amazon S3, where you can durably store the definitive versions of your static files, and Amazon EC2, where you can run your application server for dynamically generated content.;Cost-Effective- Amazon CloudFront passes on the benefits of Amazon’s scale to you. You pay only for the content that you deliver through the network, without minimum commitments or up-front fees.;Elastic- With Amazon CloudFront, you don’t need to worry about maintaining expensive web-server capacity to meet the demand from potential traffic spikes for your content. The service automatically responds as demand increases or decreases without any intervention from you.;Reliable- Amazon CloudFront is built using Amazon’s highly reliable infrastructure. The distributed nature of edge locations used by Amazon CloudFront automatically routes end users to the closest available location as required by network conditions.;Global- Amazon CloudFront uses a global network of edge locations, located near your end users in the United States, Europe, Asia, and South America.
Globally distributed microservice applications;Dynamic applications with global reach;Global, real-time performance and availability for your app or API;Scale up your global application;Protect your app from attacks;Centralised traffic orchestration view
Statistics
Stacks
21.5K
Stacks
23
Followers
10.8K
Followers
53
Votes
935
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 245
    Fast
  • 166
    Cdn
  • 157
    Compatible with other aws services
  • 125
    Simple
  • 108
    Global
Cons
  • 3
    UI could use some work
  • 1
    Invalidations take so long
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Amazon CloudFront, Azure Front Door?

CloudFlare

CloudFlare

Cloudflare speeds up and protects millions of websites, APIs, SaaS services, and other properties connected to the Internet.

KeyCDN

KeyCDN

KeyCDN offers super fast and secure content delivery for minimal loading time. In addition to the CDN, it also offers advanced image processing and many other features such as live logs and Let's Encrypt SSL.

Fastly

Fastly

Fastly's real-time content delivery network gives you total control over your content, unprecedented access to performance analytics, and the ability to instantly update content in 150 milliseconds.

MaxCDN

MaxCDN

The MaxCDN Content Delivery Network efficiently delivers your site’s static file through hundreds of servers instead of slogging through a single host. This "smart route" technology distributes your content to your visitors via the city closest to them.

jsDelivr

jsDelivr

jsDelivr is a free CDN for open source developers, with advanced features for javascript projects with access to NPM and Github It uses multiple CDN providers, resulting in the best possible uptime and performance.

Moovweb XDN

Moovweb XDN

All-in-one platform to develop, deploy, preview, experiment on, monitor, and run your frontend.

Limelight CDN

Limelight CDN

Whether it’s your website, mobile applications, videos, music, software, games, or APIs, your content needs to reach customers quickly, reliably, and securely. It provides the capacity, coverage, and performance to cost-effectively deliver a better experience for you and your customers.

cdnjs

cdnjs

Everyone loves the Google CDN? Even Microsoft runs their own CDN. The problem is, they only host the most popular libraries. We host it all - JavaScript, CSS, SWF, images, etc! Powered by CloudFlare.

Statically

Statically

A free, fast, & modern CDN for open source projects, WordPress, images, and any static assets.

Incapsula

Incapsula

Through an application-aware, global content delivery network (CDN), Incapsula provides any website and web application with best-of-breed security, DDoS protection, load balancing and failover solutions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase