Alerta vs Zabbix

Overview

Zabbix

Stacks684

Followers981

Votes66

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks1.1K

Alerta

Stacks26

Followers32

Votes0

Alerta vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Integration and Scalability: Alerta is designed to integrate with existing monitoring tools, making it easier to fit into an existing infrastructure. However, Zabbix stands out for its scalability, supporting vast amounts of devices and checks without compromising performance.
User Interface and Ease of Use: Zabbix offers a feature-rich user interface, making it suitable for complex monitoring tasks but might be overwhelming for beginners. In contrast, Alerta boasts a simple and intuitive user interface that prioritizes ease of use for users of all skill levels.
Alerting and Escalation: Alerta focuses on flexible alerting and notification options, allowing users to customize alerts based on specific criteria. On the other hand, Zabbix excels in its escalation management, offering advanced capabilities to ensure alerts are properly addressed and managed.
Dashboard and Reporting: Zabbix provides extensive reporting capabilities, with customizable dashboards that offer insights into performance and trends. In comparison, Alerta's reporting features are more streamlined, providing essential data for quick analysis and decision-making.
Monitoring Capabilities: Zabbix is known for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, offering support for numerous data types and protocols. Alerta, while versatile, may not match Zabbix's extensive monitoring features, especially in specialized environments.
Community Support and Documentation: Zabbix has a large and active community with extensive documentation available, making it easier for users to troubleshoot and find solutions to common issues. Alerta, while growing, may not have the same level of community support and documentation available.

In Summary, Alerta focuses on integration, ease of use, and alert customization, while Zabbix excels in scalability, monitoring capabilities, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Zabbix, Alerta

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

796k views796k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix	Alerta
Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.	It combines a JSON API server for receiving, processing and rendering alerts with a simple, yet effective Alerta Web UI and command-line tool.
Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation	Supports SQL; Flexible alert format; De-duplication and simple correlation
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 684	Stacks 26
Followers 981	Followers 32
Votes 66	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 Free 9 Alerts 5 Service/node/network discovery 5 Templates 4 Base metrics from the box Cons 5 The UI is in PHP 2 Puppet module is sluggish	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack Jira PagerDuty Grafana Ansible Skype Chef Bugzilla HipChat ServiceNow.com	Slack Prometheus New Relic PagerDuty Grafana Kibana InfluxDB Nagios Amazon CloudWatch Sensu

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, Alerta?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

Alerta vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Integration and Scalability: Alerta is designed to integrate with existing monitoring tools, making it easier to fit into an existing infrastructure. However, Zabbix stands out for its scalability, supporting vast amounts of devices and checks without compromising performance.
User Interface and Ease of Use: Zabbix offers a feature-rich user interface, making it suitable for complex monitoring tasks but might be overwhelming for beginners. In contrast, Alerta boasts a simple and intuitive user interface that prioritizes ease of use for users of all skill levels.
Alerting and Escalation: Alerta focuses on flexible alerting and notification options, allowing users to customize alerts based on specific criteria. On the other hand, Zabbix excels in its escalation management, offering advanced capabilities to ensure alerts are properly addressed and managed.
Dashboard and Reporting: Zabbix provides extensive reporting capabilities, with customizable dashboards that offer insights into performance and trends. In comparison, Alerta's reporting features are more streamlined, providing essential data for quick analysis and decision-making.
Monitoring Capabilities: Zabbix is known for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities, offering support for numerous data types and protocols. Alerta, while versatile, may not match Zabbix's extensive monitoring features, especially in specialized environments.
Community Support and Documentation: Zabbix has a large and active community with extensive documentation available, making it easier for users to troubleshoot and find solutions to common issues. Alerta, while growing, may not have the same level of community support and documentation available.

In Summary, Alerta focuses on integration, ease of use, and alert customization, while Zabbix excels in scalability, monitoring capabilities, and community support.

Alerta vs Zabbix

Overview