StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Concurrency Frameworks
  5. Akka vs RxJava

Akka vs RxJava

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Akka
Akka
Stacks1.2K
Followers1.0K
Votes88
RxJava
RxJava
Stacks464
Followers175
Votes1
GitHub Stars48.4K
Forks7.6K

Akka vs RxJava: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Akka and RxJava. Both Akka and RxJava are popular frameworks used in concurrent and asynchronous programming, but they have different approaches and features.

  1. Concurrency Model: Akka follows the actor concurrency model, whereas RxJava follows the reactive streams model. In Akka, actors communicate asynchronously by sending messages to each other, while in RxJava, reactive streams allow for the flow of data and events between components in an asynchronous manner.

  2. Error Handling: Akka provides supervisors that handle errors and exceptions at the actor level, allowing for fault-tolerant systems. On the other hand, RxJava handles errors using the observer pattern, where errors are propagated to the observer, who can handle them accordingly.

  3. Backpressure Handling: Akka uses a mailbox-based approach for backpressure handling, where actors have a bounded mailbox and can control the rate of incoming messages. RxJava, on the other hand, relies on the reactive streams backpressure mechanism to handle the flow of data in case of overloaded subscribers.

  4. Integration: Akka is designed to work well in distributed systems and provides built-in support for remote actors and distributed messaging. RxJava, on the other hand, is primarily focused on handling asynchronous and reactive programming within a single application or system.

  5. Concurrency Model Granularity: Akka provides a fine-grained concurrency model with individual actors that can handle specific tasks or functionalities. In contrast, RxJava focuses on composing multiple streams and provides a more coarse-grained concurrency model.

  6. Language Support: Akka is implemented in Scala but provides APIs for both Scala and Java. RxJava, on the other hand, is implemented in Java and provides APIs only for Java.

In summary, Akka and RxJava differ in their concurrency models, error handling mechanisms, backpressure handling approaches, integration capabilities, concurrency model granularity, and language support. Akka emphasizes distributed systems and fine-grained concurrency, while RxJava focuses on reactive programming within a single application or system using reactive streams.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Akka
Akka
RxJava
RxJava

Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.

A library for composing asynchronous and event-based programs by using observable sequences for the Java VM.

-
Open source
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
48.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
464
Followers
1.0K
Followers
175
Votes
88
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 32
    Great concurrency model
  • 17
    Fast
  • 12
    Actor Library
  • 10
    Open source
  • 7
    Resilient
Cons
  • 3
    Mixing futures with Akka tell is difficult
  • 2
    Closing of futures
  • 2
    No type safety
  • 1
    Very difficult to refactor
  • 1
    Typed actors still not stable
Pros
  • 1
    Reactive Libraries as per Reactive Manifesto
Integrations
No integrations available
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Akka, RxJava?

Quarkus

Quarkus

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

Orleans

Orleans

Orleans is a framework that provides a straightforward approach to building distributed high-scale computing applications, without the need to learn and apply complex concurrency or other scaling patterns. It was created by Microsoft Research and designed for use in the cloud.

RxJS

RxJS

RxJS is a library for reactive programming using Observables, to make it easier to compose asynchronous or callback-based code. This project is a rewrite of Reactive-Extensions/RxJS with better performance, better modularity, better debuggable call stacks, while staying mostly backwards compatible, with some breaking changes that reduce the API surface.

MyBatis

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

Netty

Netty

Netty is a NIO client server framework which enables quick and easy development of network applications such as protocol servers and clients. It greatly simplifies and streamlines network programming such as TCP and UDP socket server.

Finagle

Finagle

Finagle is an extensible RPC system for the JVM, used to construct high-concurrency servers. Finagle implements uniform client and server APIs for several protocols, and is designed for high performance and concurrency.

guava

guava

The Guava project contains several of Google's core libraries that we rely on in our Java-based projects: collections, caching, primitives support, concurrency libraries, common annotations, string processing, I/O, and so forth.

Thymeleaf

Thymeleaf

It is a modern server-side Java template engine for both web and standalone environments. It is aimed at creating elegant web code while adding powerful features and retaining prototyping abilities.

JSF

JSF

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

JavaMelody

JavaMelody

It is used to monitor Java or Java EE application servers in QA and production environments. It is not a tool to simulate requests from users, it is a tool to measure and calculate statistics on real operation of an application depending on the usage of the application by users. It is mainly based on statistics of requests and on evolution charts.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase