Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Akka vs Highland.js: What are the differences?
Introduction
When comparing Akka and Highland.js, it is important to understand key differences between these two frameworks commonly used for building scalable and reactive applications.
Concurrency Model: one of the main differences between Akka and Highland.js is in their approach to concurrency. Akka is based on the Actor Model, where each actor is an independent entity that communicates asynchronously via message passing. On the other hand, Highland.js is a library that provides utilities for managing asynchronous operations in a more functional programming style, without relying on actors.
Language Compatibility: Akka is primarily designed for use with the JVM languages like Java and Scala, making it a more suitable choice for projects that are based on these languages. In contrast, Highland.js is a JavaScript library, making it more compatible with Node.js applications and other JavaScript-based environments.
Fault Tolerance: Akka provides built-in support for supervisor hierarchies, allowing for the automatic restart of failed actors and the isolation of failures. This makes it a popular choice for building fault-tolerant systems. Highland.js, on the other hand, does not have built-in mechanisms for handling faults and failures, requiring developers to implement their own error handling strategies.
Stream Processing: Highland.js is specifically designed for stream processing, providing a set of high-level abstractions for working with streams of data in a functional style. In comparison, Akka also supports stream processing through the Akka Streams module but is more focused on actor-based concurrency.
Community and Ecosystem: Akka has a larger and more established community, with extensive documentation, support, and a wide range of plugins and integrations available. Highland.js, being a JavaScript library, benefits from the vibrant Node.js ecosystem but may have a more limited community compared to Akka.
Performance Considerations: Akka is optimized for high-performance and scalability, leveraging the actor model and reactive programming principles. Highland.js, while efficient in handling asynchronous operations, may not offer the same level of performance optimizations as Akka in certain contexts.
In Summary, Akka and Highland.js differ in their concurrency model, language compatibility, fault tolerance mechanisms, focus on stream processing, community support, and performance considerations.
Pros of Akka
- Great concurrency model32
- Fast17
- Actor Library12
- Open source10
- Resilient7
- Message driven5
- Scalable5
Pros of Highland.js
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Akka
- Mixing futures with Akka tell is difficult3
- Closing of futures2
- No type safety2
- Very difficult to refactor1
- Typed actors still not stable1