StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Self Hosted Blogging Cms
  5. AEM vs Joomla!

AEM vs Joomla!

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Joomla!
Joomla!
Stacks1.5K
Followers337
Votes37
GitHub Stars5.0K
Forks3.7K
AEM
AEM
Stacks108
Followers134
Votes0

AEM vs Joomla!: What are the differences?

# A Comparison of AEM and Joomla!

Introduction: AEM (Adobe Experience Manager) and Joomla! are both popular Content Management Systems (CMS) used for website development. However, they have key differences that separate them from each other.

1. **Architecture**: AEM is a Java-based CMS developed by Adobe, known for its flexibility and scalability due to its component-based architecture. On the other hand, Joomla! is a PHP-based CMS known for its simplicity and ease of use, often preferred by beginners or small businesses.

2. **Customization**: AEM provides extensive customization options with its robust set of tools and APIs, making it suitable for large enterprises with complex requirements. In comparison, Joomla! offers a range of extensions and templates for customization, making it suitable for small to medium-sized websites with less complexity.

3. **Scalability**: AEM is designed to handle high traffic volumes and complex websites, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications. In contrast, Joomla! may struggle with scalability for large-scale projects due to the limitations of its architecture and performance.

4. **Community Support**: Joomla! has a large and active community that provides support and resources for users, offering a wealth of plugins, extensions, and documentation. AEM, being a proprietary software, has limited community support but offers official support through Adobe for licensed users.

5. **Security**: AEM is known for its robust security features, built-in authentication, and authorization mechanisms to protect data and prevent security vulnerabilities. Joomla! also prioritizes security but may require additional plugins or configurations to enhance security measures.

6. **Cost**: AEM is a premium CMS that requires a significant investment in licensing and maintenance, making it more suitable for large organizations with substantial budgets. Joomla! is open-source and free to use, with optional costs for extensions or professional support, making it a cost-effective choice for small businesses or personal websites.

In Summary, AEM and Joomla! offer distinct advantages and cater to different needs based on factors such as architecture, customization, scalability, community support, security, and cost. Choose the CMS that aligns with your project requirements and budget constraints.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Joomla!, AEM

Dragos
Dragos

Jan 6, 2020

Decided

10 Years ago I have started to check more about the online sphere and I have decided to make a website. There were a few CMS available at that time like WordPress or Joomla that you can use to have your website. At that point, I have decided to use WordPress as it was the easiest and I am glad I have made a good decision. Now WordPress is the most used CMS. Later I have created also a site about WordPress: https://www.wpdoze.com

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Joomla!
Joomla!
AEM
AEM

Joomla is a simple and powerful web server application and it requires a server with PHP and either MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server to run it.

It is a web-based client-server system for building, managing and deploying commercial websites and related services. It combines a number of infrastructure-level and application-level functions into a single integrated package.

User Management;Media Manager;Language Manager;Banner Management;Contact Management; Polls;Search;Web Link Management;Content Management;Syndication and Newsfeed Management;Menu Manager;Template Management;Integrated Help System;System Features;Web Services;Powerful Extensibility
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.0K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.5K
Stacks
108
Followers
337
Followers
134
Votes
37
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Powerful extension architecture
  • 6
    Powerfull CMS
  • 5
    Mid-Hight End level CMS
  • 4
    Highly customizable
  • 2
    Vast repository of free and paid extensions
Cons
  • 1
    Depleting dev community
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Joomla!, AEM?

WordPress

WordPress

The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.

Drupal

Drupal

Drupal is an open source content management platform powering millions of websites and applications. It’s built, used, and supported by an active and diverse community of people around the world.

Strapi

Strapi

Strapi is100% JavaScript, extensible, and fully customizable. It enables developers to build projects faster by providing a customizable API out of the box and giving them the freedom to use the their favorite tools.

Ghost

Ghost

Ghost is a platform dedicated to one thing: Publishing. It's beautifully designed, completely customisable and completely Open Source. Ghost allows you to write and publish your own blog, giving you the tools to make it easy and even fun to do.

Wagtail

Wagtail

Wagtail is a Django content management system built originally for the Royal College of Art and focused on flexibility and user experience.

OctoberCMS

OctoberCMS

It is a Laravel-based CMS engineered for simplicity. It has a simple and intuitive interface. It provides a consistent structure with an emphasis on reusability so you can focus on building something unique while we handle the boring bits.

Twill

Twill

Twill is an open source CMS toolkit for Laravel that helps developers rapidly create a custom admin console that is intuitive, powerful and flexible.

ProcessWire

ProcessWire

ProcessWire is an open source content management system (CMS) and web application framework aimed at the needs of designers, developers and their clients. ProcessWire gives you more control over your fields, templates and markup than other platforms, and provides a powerful template system that works the way you do

Typo3

Typo3

It is a free and open-source Web content management system written in PHP. It can run on several web servers, such as Apache or IIS, on top of many operating systems, among them Linux, Microsoft Windows, FreeBSD, macOS and OS/2.

Directus

Directus

Let's say you're planning on managing content for a website, native app, and widget. Instead of using a CMS that's baked into the website client, it makes more sense to decouple your content entirely and access it through an API or SDK. That's a headless CMS. That's Directus.

Related Comparisons

HipChat
Slack

HipChat vs Mattermost vs Slack

Litmus
Email on Acid

Email on Acid vs Litmus

InVision
Proto.io

InVision vs Marvel vs Proto.io

Webex
Microsoft Teams

Microsoft Teams vs Webex

Slack
RocketChat

Mattermost vs RocketChat vs Slack