StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. AdonisJS vs Sails.js

AdonisJS vs Sails.js

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sails.js
Sails.js
Stacks337
Followers511
Votes296
GitHub Stars22.9K
Forks1.9K
AdonisJS
AdonisJS
Stacks210
Followers456
Votes122

AdonisJS vs Sails.js: What are the differences?

Key differences between AdonisJS and Sails.js

AdonisJS and Sails.js are both Node.js web frameworks that simplify the development of scalable web applications. However, there are key differences between the two frameworks that developers should consider when choosing which one to use for their projects.

  1. Architecture: AdonisJS follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architecture, which provides a clear separation of concerns and promotes code organization. On the other hand, Sails.js follows the convention-over-configuration approach, allowing developers to focus on writing application code without worrying about complex configurations.

  2. ORM: AdonisJS uses its own ORM called Lucid, which is a query builder and database adapter. It provides a fluent and intuitive way to interact with databases. Sails.js, on the other hand, supports multiple ORMs like Waterline and Sequelize, giving developers the flexibility to choose the one that best suits their needs.

  3. WebSocket support: AdonisJS has built-in support for WebSockets through the use of its own WebSocket server implementation. This makes it easy to build real-time applications that require bidirectional communication. Sails.js also supports WebSockets, but it requires additional configuration and the use of external libraries.

  4. Community and ecosystem: AdonisJS has a smaller but growing community compared to Sails.js. It has an active core team that maintains the framework and regularly releases updates. Sails.js, on the other hand, has a larger community and a more mature ecosystem with a wide range of plugins and libraries available.

  5. Learning curve: AdonisJS has a steeper learning curve compared to Sails.js due to its more opinionated approach and the use of its own ORM. Developers familiar with MVC frameworks may find it easier to pick up AdonisJS. Sails.js, on the other hand, has a shallower learning curve and is more beginner-friendly, thanks to its convention-over-configuration approach.

  6. Performance: AdonisJS is known for its high performance, thanks to its efficient database query builder and WebSocket server implementation. Sails.js, on the other hand, may have slightly lower performance due to its ORM abstraction layer and the need for additional configurations.

In summary, AdonisJS and Sails.js have different architectural approaches, ORM choices, WebSocket support, community size, learning curves, and performance characteristics. Developers should consider these key differences when choosing between the two frameworks for their projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Sails.js
Sails.js
AdonisJS
AdonisJS

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

It is a Node.js Framework which is highly focused on developer ergonomics, stability and confidence.

-
mvc, orm, service provider, router
Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.9K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
337
Stacks
210
Followers
511
Followers
456
Votes
296
Votes
122
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 49
    Data-driven apis
  • 47
    Waterline ORM
  • 37
    Mvc
  • 32
    Easy rest
  • 25
    Real-time
Cons
  • 5
    Waterline ORM
  • 4
    Defaults to VueJS
  • 0
    Standard MVC
Pros
  • 25
    Laravel like
  • 24
    Easy to learn
  • 23
    MVC
  • 21
    Beautiful code
  • 10
    ORM Mapper
Cons
  • 5
    Small community
  • 1
    Poor documentation
Integrations
Grunt
Grunt
Node.js
Node.js
MySQL
MySQL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MongoDB
MongoDB
Socket.IO
Socket.IO
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Sails.js, AdonisJS?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase