What is SmartGit and what are its top alternatives?
SmartGit is a user-friendly Git client that provides users with a graphical interface to easily manage their Git repositories. It offers features such as branching, merging, and code reviewing, making it a popular choice among developers. However, SmartGit is not free and may have limitations in terms of customization and advanced Git features compared to other tools in the market.
GitKraken: GitKraken is a powerful Git client that offers features like seamless integration with GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, along with a visually appealing user interface. Pros include great visualization tools and a straightforward workflow, but the cons may include a higher price point for the premium version.
SourceTree: SourceTree is a free Git client developed by Atlassian that provides a variety of features such as full powered Git GUI, branch management, and Gitflow support. Pros include robust integration with other Atlassian products, while cons may include occasional performance issues.
GitHub Desktop: GitHub Desktop is a lightweight Git client that simplifies the management of Git repositories, especially for users familiar with GitHub. Pros include seamless integration with GitHub and an intuitive user interface, while cons may include limited advanced features compared to other tools.
Bitbucket: Bitbucket is a Git solution by Atlassian that offers features such as code collaboration, Jira integration, and unlimited private repositories for small teams. Pros include seamless integration with other Atlassian products and robust security measures, while cons may include a learning curve for beginners.
GitLab: GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that includes Git repository management along with features for CI/CD, issue tracking, and collaboration. Pros include a single application for the entire DevOps lifecycle, while cons may include complex setup and configuration for larger organizations.
Tower: Tower is a Git client designed specifically for macOS that offers a range of features such as submodule support, Git-flow, and interactive rebase. Pros include a clean user interface and powerful features tailored for macOS, while cons may include a higher price point compared to other tools.
Magit: Magit is a powerful Git interface for Emacs that provides users with full control over their Git repositories directly within the text editor. Pros include deep integration with Emacs and extensive customization options, while cons may include a steep learning curve for new users.
GitUp: GitUp is a Git client for macOS that offers a streamlined workflow and features like interactive rebase and real-time collaboration. Pros include a clean and intuitive interface, while cons may include limited features compared to more established tools.
Fork: Fork is a Git client for Windows and macOS that provides users with an intuitive interface, quick access to repositories, and powerful branching tools. Pros include a clean user interface and seamless integration with popular Git platforms, while cons may include occasional performance issues.
Gogs: Gogs is a self-hosted Git service that offers features like repository management, issue tracking, and collaboration tools. Pros include lightweight deployment and easy setup, while cons may include limited scalability compared to larger Git platforms.
Top Alternatives to SmartGit
TowerUse all of Git's powerful feature set - in a GUI that makes you more productive. ...
SourceTreeUse the full capability of Git and Mercurial in the SourceTree desktop app. Manage all your repositories, hosted or local, through SourceTree's simple interface. ...
GitKrakenThe downright luxurious Git client for Windows, Mac and Linux. Cross-platform, 100% standalone, and free. ...
TortoiseGitIt is a Git revision control client, implemented as a Windows shell extension and based on TortoiseSVN. It is free software released under the GNU General Public License. ...
ForkManage your repositories without leaving the application. Organize the repositores into categories. Fork's Diff Viewer provides a clear view to spot the changes in your source code quickly. ...
Sublime MergeA snappy UI, three-way merge tool, side-by-side diffs, syntax highlighting, and more. Evaluate for free – no account, tracking, or time limits. ...
GitUpGitUp lets you see your entire labyrinth of branches and merges with perfect clarity. Any change you make, large or small, even outside GitUp, is immediately reflected in GitUp's graph. No refreshing, no waiting. ...
SmartGit alternatives & related posts
- Git19
- Just works16
- Version control10
- Awesome6
- Simple layout6
- Multiple windows4
- Automatic repo discovery3
- Multiple tabs3
- Submodule support2
- Github integration2
- Full featured client2
- Uses standard git terminology and methods2
- Gitflow support2
- Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines2
- SAS1
- Expensive5
- Subscription based4
- No side by side diff1
- Merge conflict resolution impossible/unclear0
related Tower posts
Tower appears to be between GitKraken and SourceTree in detail, but gave two scary error dialogs when attempting to merge resulted in a conflict. Doing the same in SourceTree just worked and showed the conflict in its handy file view that's always visible (unlike Tower's mere "Merge branch 'X' into develop" message when the commit is selected).
Both GitKraken and Tower lack the commit hash in their history overview, requiring one to select a commit to see it.
GitKraken appears to be the only Windows 10 Git GUI suitable for night shifts, but like Tower is only free for 30 days, unlike SourceTree.
- Visual history and branch view205
- Beautiful UI164
- Easy repository browsing134
- Gitflow support87
- Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines75
- Great branch visualization22
- Ui/ux and user-friendliness18
- Best Git Client UI/Features8
- Search commit messages7
- Available for Windows and macOS5
- Log only one file1
- Search file content1
- Crashes often12
- So many bugs8
- Fetching is slow sometimes7
- No dark theme (Windows)5
- Extremely slow5
- Very unstable5
- Can't select text in diff (windows)4
- Freezes quite frequently3
- Can't scale window from top corners3
- UI blinking2
- Windows version worse than mac version2
- Installs to AppData folder (windows)2
- Diff makes tab indentation look like spaces2
- Windows and Mac versions are very different2
- Diff appears as if space indented even if its tabs2
- Doesn't have an option for git init2
- Useless for merge conflict resolution2
- Doesn't differentiate submodules from parent repos2
- Requires bitbucket account2
- Generally hard to like1
- No reflog support1
- Bases binary check on filesize1
- Can't add remotes by right clicking remotes (windows)1
related SourceTree posts
Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:
- GitHub (incl. GitHub Pages/Markdown for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
- Respectively Git as revision control system
- SourceTree as Git GUI
- Visual Studio Code as IDE
- CircleCI for continuous integration (automatize development process)
- Prettier / TSLint / ESLint as code linter
- SonarQube as quality gate
- Docker as container management (incl. Docker Compose for multi-container application management)
- VirtualBox for operating system simulation tests
- Kubernetes as cluster management for docker containers
- Heroku for deploying in test environments
- nginx as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
- SSLMate (using OpenSSL) for certificate management
- Amazon EC2 (incl. Amazon S3) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
- PostgreSQL as preferred database system
- Redis as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)
The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:
- Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
- Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
- Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
- Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
- Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
- Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.
Tower appears to be between GitKraken and SourceTree in detail, but gave two scary error dialogs when attempting to merge resulted in a conflict. Doing the same in SourceTree just worked and showed the conflict in its handy file view that's always visible (unlike Tower's mere "Merge branch 'X' into develop" message when the commit is selected).
Both GitKraken and Tower lack the commit hash in their history overview, requiring one to select a commit to see it.
GitKraken appears to be the only Windows 10 Git GUI suitable for night shifts, but like Tower is only free for 30 days, unlike SourceTree.
- Dark theme59
- Best linux git client34
- Great overview29
- Full featured client21
- Gitflow support20
- Beautiful UI19
- Very easy to use18
- Graph16
- Works great on both linux and windows13
- Effortless13
- Easy Merge Conflict Tool6
- Amazing Github and Bitbucket integration5
- Great UX4
- Integration with GitHub3
- Automatic Repo Discovery3
- Submodule support3
- Easy to Learn and Setup3
- Super fast3
- Fuzzy find (CTRL P)2
- Very user friendly1
- Much more stable than source tree1
- Great for non-dev users1
- Because it has Linux client1
- Command palette (CTRL Shift P)1
- Extremely slow when working with large repositories3
- No edit/fixup in interactive rebase3
- Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)3
- Not as many features as sourcetree2
- Do not allow to directly edit staging area2
- Does not work like a Mac app2
related GitKraken posts
Tower appears to be between GitKraken and SourceTree in detail, but gave two scary error dialogs when attempting to merge resulted in a conflict. Doing the same in SourceTree just worked and showed the conflict in its handy file view that's always visible (unlike Tower's mere "Merge branch 'X' into develop" message when the commit is selected).
Both GitKraken and Tower lack the commit hash in their history overview, requiring one to select a commit to see it.
GitKraken appears to be the only Windows 10 Git GUI suitable for night shifts, but like Tower is only free for 30 days, unlike SourceTree.
GitKraken is the best git client so far. The user interface is very friendly. Everything is easy to do with this tool. A branch tree vizualization is very clear. I've tried SourceTree and I got lost in such many panels. Also performance of SourceTree is not as goot as GitKraken. I like Sublime Merge but it doesn't have so many features as the other tools. I've choosen GitKraken and as bonus I got GitKraken Glo that is the next perfect tool.
- Turns Explorer into a git client4
- Free1
related TortoiseGit posts
- One of the easiest and fastest git GUIs19
- Nice UX14
- Does the job way better than others13
- Fast, Great support, Does-it-all, blazing fast13
- Dark theme11
- Intuitive interactive rebase and conflict resolution UI9
- Gitflow support9
- Excellent commit history tree view7
- This even looks the same as SourceTree5
- Repository Manager4
- Built-in developer feedback3
- Countless quality of life features3
- Github Notifications2
- Not buggy, works smoothly2
- Keyaboard-only2
- Visual branch history2
- Reflog support2
- Git ammend1
- Smart 'Open in' menu; e.g. explorer, bit, giithub .1
- Interactive rebase window1
- Native application1
- Intuitive merge conflict resolution1
- Unique Activity Manager shows current/past operations1
- Poorly written license2
- Stability is fragile when looking deeply into history1
- Merges that require interactive user decision1
related Fork posts
- Speed11
- Hotkeys5
- Beautify UI5
- Command Palete4
- Blame and File History3
- Submodule Management3
- Command Line Integration3
- Commit Editing3
- Outputs matching git CLI command3
- Sublime Text Integration3
- Three-Way Merge3
- Only light mode available for evaluation2
related Sublime Merge posts
Visual Studio Code
Git
Sublime Merge
Visual Studio Live Share
Atom+1 moreWe use Visual Studio Code because it allows us to easily and quickly integrate with Git, much like Sublime Merge ,but it is integrated into the IDE. Another cool part about VS Code is the ability collaborate with each other with Visual Studio Live Share which allows our whole team to get more done together. It brings the convenience of the Google Suite to programming, offering something that works more smoothly than anything found on Atom or Sublime Text
GitKraken is the best git client so far. The user interface is very friendly. Everything is easy to do with this tool. A branch tree vizualization is very clear. I've tried SourceTree and I got lost in such many panels. Also performance of SourceTree is not as goot as GitKraken. I like Sublime Merge but it doesn't have so many features as the other tools. I've choosen GitKraken and as bonus I got GitKraken Glo that is the next perfect tool.
- Fast6
- Can edit commit messages6
- Simple interface5
- Native OSX App5
- Easy rebase3
- Great branch visualization3
- Search commit messages2
- Beautiful UI2
- Visual history and branch view2
- Incredibly easy squash2