Alternatives to RedLine13 logo

Alternatives to RedLine13

BlazeMeter, Apache JMeter, Gatling, Locust, and k6 are the most popular alternatives and competitors to RedLine13.
14
20
+ 1
8

What is RedLine13 and what are its top alternatives?

It is a load testing platform that brings the low cost power of the cloud to JMeter and other open source load testing tools.
RedLine13 is a tool in the Load and Performance Testing category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to RedLine13

  • BlazeMeter
    BlazeMeter

    Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br> ...

  • Apache JMeter
    Apache JMeter

    It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions. ...

  • Gatling
    Gatling

    Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support. ...

  • Locust
    Locust

    Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle. ...

  • k6
    k6

    It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow. ...

  • AWS Device Farm
    AWS Device Farm

    Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors. ...

  • Loader.io
    Loader.io

    Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections. ...

  • Flood IO
    Flood IO

    Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk. ...

RedLine13 alternatives & related posts

BlazeMeter logo

BlazeMeter

63
146
13
The Load Testing Platform for Developers
63
146
+ 1
13
PROS OF BLAZEMETER
  • 10
    I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts.
  • 3
    Easy to prepare JMeter workers
CONS OF BLAZEMETER
  • 1
    Costly
  • 1
    UI centric

related BlazeMeter posts

Apache JMeter logo

Apache JMeter

375
253
10
An open source load testing tool
375
253
+ 1
10
PROS OF APACHE JMETER
  • 5
    Requires no programming knowledge
  • 3
    Supports distributed
  • 2
    Open-source
CONS OF APACHE JMETER
  • 1
    It's GUI-first
  • 1
    Too complicated

related Apache JMeter posts

Gatling logo

Gatling

238
298
21
Open-source load testing for DevOps and CI/CD
238
298
+ 1
21
PROS OF GATLING
  • 6
    Great detailed reports
  • 5
    Loadrunner
  • 5
    Can run in cluster mode
  • 3
    Scala based
  • 2
    Load test as code
CONS OF GATLING
  • 2
    Steep Learning Curve
  • 1
    Hard to test non-supported protocols
  • 0
    Not distributed

related Gatling posts

Shared insights
on
LocustLocustGatlingGatlingJenkinsJenkins

I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

See more
Vrashab Jian
Shared insights
on
Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

See more
Locust logo

Locust

157
283
50
Define user behaviour with Python code, and swarm your system with millions of simultaneous users
157
283
+ 1
50
PROS OF LOCUST
  • 14
    Hackable
  • 11
    Supports distributed
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 6
    Easy to setup
  • 4
    Fast
  • 2
    Test Anything
CONS OF LOCUST
  • 1
    Bad design

related Locust posts

Shared insights
on
LocustLocustGatlingGatlingJenkinsJenkins

I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

See more
Vrashab Jian
Shared insights
on
Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

See more
k6 logo

k6

157
174
50
Developer centric open-source load and performance testing tool
157
174
+ 1
50
PROS OF K6
  • 12
    Fits nicely in a CI workflow
  • 10
    Test scripts are written in javascript
  • 10
    Open-source
  • 10
    It's code-first
  • 8
    Easy to use
CONS OF K6
  • 2
    Requires bundling and transpiling to use npm packages

related k6 posts

Shared insights
on
JavaScriptJavaScriptk6k6LocustLocust

We're using Locust for load testing and k6. I came across k6 and I like JavaScript, please suggest which is better for API testing k6 or Locust?

See more
AWS Device Farm logo

AWS Device Farm

73
169
5
Test your app on real devices in the AWS Cloud
73
169
+ 1
5
PROS OF AWS DEVICE FARM
  • 3
    1000 free minutes
  • 2
    Pay as you go pricing
CONS OF AWS DEVICE FARM
  • 1
    Records all sessions, blocks on processing when done
  • 1
    You need to remember to turn airplane mode off

related AWS Device Farm posts

Loader.io logo

Loader.io

71
168
18
Simple Cloud-based Load Testing
71
168
+ 1
18
PROS OF LOADER.IO
  • 9
    Easy to use
  • 6
    Free tier
  • 3
    Heroku add-on
CONS OF LOADER.IO
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Loader.io posts

    Flood IO logo

    Flood IO

    18
    63
    5
    Where scalable software starts
    18
    63
    + 1
    5
    PROS OF FLOOD IO
    • 2
      Great feature set
    • 2
      Affordable
    • 1
      Easy to use
    CONS OF FLOOD IO
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Flood IO posts

      Vrashab Jian
      Shared insights
      on
      Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

      I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

      I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

      See more