Alternatives to Ranorex Studio logo

Alternatives to Ranorex Studio

Selenium, BrowserStack, Karma, LambdaTest, and LambdaTest are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Ranorex Studio.
13
13
+ 1
0

What is Ranorex Studio and what are its top alternatives?

Ranorex Studio is a comprehensive test automation tool that allows users to automate testing for web, desktop, and mobile applications. It offers features such as recording and replaying tests, advanced scripting capabilities, test reporting, and integration with various CI/CD tools. However, Ranorex Studio is a paid tool with a relatively high cost, which may not be suitable for smaller teams or individual users looking for a free solution.

  1. Selenium: Selenium is a popular open-source test automation tool that supports automation across different browsers and platforms. It offers a wide range of programming languages for scripting, making it versatile for various projects. Pros include being open-source and having a large community for support, while cons may include the need for more technical expertise compared to Ranorex Studio.

  2. Katalon Studio: Katalon Studio is a comprehensive test automation solution for web and mobile applications. It offers a user-friendly interface, record and playback capabilities, and integration with various CI/CD tools. Pros include its ease of use and robust features, while cons may include limitations in customization compared to Ranorex Studio.

  3. TestComplete: TestComplete is a powerful automated testing tool that supports a wide range of applications, including web, desktop, and mobile. It offers features such as keyword-driven testing, scriptless automation, and integration with popular tools. Pros include its flexibility and ease of use, while cons may include its cost compared to open-source alternatives.

  4. UFT/QTP: Unified Functional Testing (UFT), formerly known as QuickTest Professional (QTP), is an automated functional testing tool by Micro Focus. It offers features such as keyword-driven testing, test automation for various technologies, and integration with CI/CD pipelines. Pros include its robust features and long-standing reputation, while cons may include its cost and learning curve for new users.

  5. Robot Framework: Robot Framework is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development (ATDD). It offers a keyword-driven approach, easy-to-read test cases, and support for various libraries and tools. Pros include its flexibility and extensibility, while cons may include the need for additional libraries for certain functionalities.

  6. Appium: Appium is an open-source test automation tool for mobile applications, supporting both native and hybrid apps on iOS and Android platforms. It offers cross-platform capabilities, integration with popular programming languages, and ease of setup. Pros include its open-source nature and broad device support, while cons may include the learning curve for beginners.

  7. TestProject: TestProject is a free test automation platform that offers a cloud-based solution for web, mobile, and API testing. It provides features such as record and playback, smart test recorder, test maintenance, and collaborative testing. Pros include its free tier for small teams and easy integration with popular testing frameworks, while cons may include limitations in customization compared to paid tools.

  8. Postman: Postman is not just an API testing tool; it also offers features for automated testing of APIs and web services. It provides capabilities for automated testing, monitoring, and documenting APIs, making it suitable for developers and testers. Pros include its user-friendly interface and collaboration features, while cons may include its focus on API testing rather than UI testing.

  9. Cypress: Cypress is a modern test automation tool specifically designed for web applications. It offers fast, reliable testing, interactive debugging, and real-time reloading for efficient test development. Pros include its fast execution speed and user-friendly experience, while cons may include limitations in testing non-web applications.

  10. Testim: Testim is an AI-powered test automation tool that uses machine learning algorithms to improve test creation and maintenance. It offers features such as self-healing tests, visual testing, and integrations with popular tools and frameworks. Pros include its AI capabilities for smarter testing and ease of test creation, while cons may include potential limitations in customization for specific testing needs.

Top Alternatives to Ranorex Studio

  • Selenium
    Selenium

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...

  • BrowserStack
    BrowserStack

    BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. ...

  • Karma
    Karma

    Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like. ...

  • LambdaTest
    LambdaTest

    LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest. ...

  • LambdaTest
    LambdaTest

    LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest. ...

  • Playwright
    Playwright

    It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast. ...

  • WebdriverIO
    WebdriverIO

    WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read. ...

  • Sauce Labs
    Sauce Labs

    Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready. ...

Ranorex Studio alternatives & related posts

Selenium logo

Selenium

15.4K
12.3K
525
Web Browser Automation
15.4K
12.3K
+ 1
525
PROS OF SELENIUM
  • 175
    Automates browsers
  • 154
    Testing
  • 101
    Essential tool for running test automation
  • 24
    Record-Playback
  • 24
    Remote Control
  • 8
    Data crawling
  • 7
    Supports end to end testing
  • 6
    Easy set up
  • 6
    Functional testing
  • 4
    The Most flexible monitoring system
  • 3
    End to End Testing
  • 3
    Easy to integrate with build tools
  • 2
    Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
  • 2
    Record and playback
  • 2
    Compatible with Python
  • 2
    Easy to scale
  • 2
    Integration Tests
  • 0
    Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework
CONS OF SELENIUM
  • 8
    Flaky tests
  • 4
    Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
  • 2
    Update browser drivers

related Selenium posts

Kamil Kowalski
Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 3.9M views

When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

See more
Benjamin Poon
QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 1.9M views

For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

See more
BrowserStack logo

BrowserStack

2.7K
2K
498
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale, & optimize...
2.7K
2K
+ 1
498
PROS OF BROWSERSTACK
  • 134
    Multiple browsers
  • 75
    Ease of use
  • 64
    Real browsers
  • 43
    Ability to use it locally
  • 26
    Good price
  • 20
    Great web interface
  • 18
    IE support
  • 16
    Official mobile emulators
  • 14
    Instant access
  • 14
    Cloud-based access
  • 11
    Real mobile devices
  • 7
    Multiple Desktop OS
  • 7
    Selenium compatible
  • 7
    Screenshots
  • 6
    Can be used for Testing and E2E
  • 5
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 4
    Video of test runs
  • 3
    Many browsers
  • 3
    Favourites
  • 3
    Webdriver compatible
  • 3
    Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing
  • 2
    Free for Open Source
  • 2
    Unify and track test cases
  • 2
    Test automation dashboard
  • 2
    Test Management
  • 2
    Cross-browser testing
  • 2
    Cypress Compatible
  • 2
    Bi-directional Jira Sync
  • 1
    Speed is fast
  • 1
    Real devices
  • 0
    Visual testing and review
  • 0
    Test WCAG Compliance
  • 0
    Web accessibility
CONS OF BROWSERSTACK
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions

related BrowserStack posts

Zarema Khalilova
Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 293K views

I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

See more
Karma logo

Karma

2.5K
601
181
Spectacular Test Runner for JavaScript
2.5K
601
+ 1
181
PROS OF KARMA
  • 61
    Test Runner
  • 35
    Open source
  • 27
    Continuous Integration
  • 22
    Great for running tests
  • 18
    Test on Real Devices
  • 11
    Backed by google
  • 5
    Easy Debugging
  • 2
    Remote Control
CONS OF KARMA
  • 1
    Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
  • 1
    Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically

related Karma posts

Sai Chaitanya Mankala
Tech Lead at KIOT Innovations · | 6 upvotes · 862.1K views

Protractor or Cypress for ionic-angular?

We have a huge ionic-angular app with almost 100 pages and 10+ injectables. There are no tests written yet. Before we start, we need some suggestions about the framework. Would you suggest Cypress or Angular's Protractor with Jasmine / Karma for a heavy ionic app with Angular?

See more

Switched from Jasmine with Karma that come setup by Angular CLI to use Jest instead, since Jasmine and Karma were very finicky in my setup and had to be reconfigured frequently to run tests properly.

Jest was also easier to integrate into my workflow with Visual Studio Code.

See more
LambdaTest logo

LambdaTest

538
198
204
LambdaTest is a continuous quality testing cloud platform that helps developers and testers ship code faster.
538
198
+ 1
204
PROS OF LAMBDATEST
  • 17
    Pocket friendly pricing
  • 13
    Good Performance
  • 12
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 12
    Integration with Bitbucket
  • 12
    Cross browser testing
  • 11
    Integration with Jira
  • 11
    Great support
  • 11
    Integration with GitHub
  • 10
    Integration with Trello
  • 10
    Clean UI and Easy to use
  • 10
    Integration with Slack
  • 10
    Integration with Asana
  • 8
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 8
    Integration with Hive
  • 8
    IE and Edge support
  • 6
    Local app testing
  • 6
    Multiple Browsers
  • 5
    Integration with Teamwork
  • 5
    Integration with VSTS
  • 4
    Real time testing feature is flawless
  • 3
    Selenium automation
  • 3
    Faster Speed
  • 3
    Up-to-date Browser collection
  • 2
    Robust Selenium Grid
  • 2
    Real devices
  • 2
    24/7 Customer Chat Support
CONS OF LAMBDATEST
  • 1
    Cluttered UI
  • 1
    Steep learning curve for new users
  • 1
    Limited device support

related LambdaTest posts

Sarah Elson
Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 756.7K views

@producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

See more
Sarah Elson
Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 2 upvotes · 127.4K views
Shared insights
on
SeleniumSeleniumLambdaTestLambdaTest
at
Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

Selenium LambdaTest

See more
LambdaTest logo

LambdaTest

538
198
204
LambdaTest is a continuous quality testing cloud platform that helps developers and testers ship code faster.
538
198
+ 1
204
PROS OF LAMBDATEST
  • 17
    Pocket friendly pricing
  • 13
    Good Performance
  • 12
    Integration with Gitlab
  • 12
    Integration with Bitbucket
  • 12
    Cross browser testing
  • 11
    Integration with Jira
  • 11
    Great support
  • 11
    Integration with GitHub
  • 10
    Integration with Trello
  • 10
    Clean UI and Easy to use
  • 10
    Integration with Slack
  • 10
    Integration with Asana
  • 8
    Pre-installed developer tools
  • 8
    Integration with Hive
  • 8
    IE and Edge support
  • 6
    Local app testing
  • 6
    Multiple Browsers
  • 5
    Integration with Teamwork
  • 5
    Integration with VSTS
  • 4
    Real time testing feature is flawless
  • 3
    Selenium automation
  • 3
    Faster Speed
  • 3
    Up-to-date Browser collection
  • 2
    Robust Selenium Grid
  • 2
    Real devices
  • 2
    24/7 Customer Chat Support
CONS OF LAMBDATEST
  • 1
    Cluttered UI
  • 1
    Steep learning curve for new users
  • 1
    Limited device support

related LambdaTest posts

Sarah Elson
Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 756.7K views

@producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

See more
Sarah Elson
Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 2 upvotes · 127.4K views
Shared insights
on
SeleniumSeleniumLambdaTestLambdaTest
at
Selenium Grid Setup Tutorial For Cross Browser Testing

Selenium LambdaTest

See more
Playwright logo

Playwright

411
534
76
Node library to automate Chromium, Firefox and WebKit with a single API (By Microsoft)
411
534
+ 1
76
PROS OF PLAYWRIGHT
  • 13
    Cross browser
  • 10
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Promise based
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 5
    Integrate your POMs as extensible fixtures
  • 5
    Execute tests in parallel
  • 5
    API Testing
  • 4
    Python Support
  • 4
    Capture videos, screenshots and other artifacts on fail
  • 3
    Inbuild reporters html,line,dot,json
  • 3
    Context isolation
  • 1
    Fastest
CONS OF PLAYWRIGHT
  • 12
    Less help
  • 3
    Node based
  • 2
    Does not execute outside of browser

related Playwright posts

Lily Goykhman
Engineering management at SB · | 3 upvotes · 25.6K views
Shared insights
on
PlaywrightPlaywrightPuppeteerPuppeteer

Test automation - Puppeteer is used currently, just rudimentary stuff, but considering the better choices with Playwright?

See more

We are planning to automate our test cases for the application written in AngularJS. Which tool would you suggest we use for automation, Playwright or WebdriverIO?

See more
WebdriverIO logo

WebdriverIO

341
505
40
Webdriver/Selenium 2.0 JavaScript bindings for Node.js
341
505
+ 1
40
PROS OF WEBDRIVERIO
  • 11
    Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs
  • 10
    Open Source
  • 8
    Great community
  • 7
    Easy to setup
  • 4
    Best solution for broad browser support
CONS OF WEBDRIVERIO
  • 8
    High maintenance

related WebdriverIO posts

Raziel Alron
Automation Engineer at Tipalti · | 7 upvotes · 2M views

Currently, we are using Protractor in our project. Since Protractor isn't updated anymore, we are looking for a new tool. The strongest suggestions are WebdriverIO or Puppeteer. Please help me figure out what tool would make the transition fastest and easiest. Please note that Protractor uses its own locator system, and we want the switch to be as simple as possible. Thank you!

See more
Kevin Roulleau
QA Engineer Freelance at happn · | 5 upvotes · 989.8K views

I chose WebdriverIO and Appium to implement a E2E tests solution on a native mobile app. WebdriverIO goes well beyond just implementing the Selenium / Appium protocol and allows to run tests in parallel out of the box. Appium has the big advantage of supporting iOS and Android platforms, so the test codebase and tools are exactly the same, which greatly reduces the learning curve and implementation time.

See more
Sauce Labs logo

Sauce Labs

313
434
438
Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.
313
434
+ 1
438
PROS OF SAUCE LABS
  • 60
    Selenium-compatible
  • 46
    Webdriver compatible
  • 35
    Video recordings of every test
  • 31
    Qa
  • 29
    Mobile support
  • 26
    Any programming language
  • 23
    Developer tools
  • 21
    Test local and firewalled servers
  • 20
    Jenkins integration
  • 18
    Pristine VMs
  • 17
    CI Compatible
  • 11
    Appium support
  • 9
    Parallel testing
  • 8
    Rapid environment preparation
  • 8
    Mobile device support
  • 7
    Easy testing on almost any device
  • 7
    Allows me to Focus more test automation rather than IT
  • 6
    Secure testing and easy setup
  • 5
    Easy setup with CI and fast automated tests
  • 5
    Quick support response
  • 4
    Fast and reliable to host the automated tests
  • 4
    Easy to setup and understand,
  • 3
    Easy setup and integration with Travis Ci
  • 3
    Maintained browser matrix
  • 3
    Easy onboarding, do not need to manager VMs/OS/Browsers
  • 2
    Efficient tool to verify product quality
  • 2
    Teamcity Integration and mobile testing win
  • 2
    Hany for platform testing
  • 2
    Great documentation
  • 2
    Generous free trial
  • 2
    Easy. Straightforward. Scalable
  • 2
    Great way to integrate test suite on cloud
  • 2
    Simplicity of Sauce-connect
  • 1
    Very Good, Quick, flexible Infrastructure Support
  • 1
    It's great for my QA work
  • 1
    Awesome tech support
  • 1
    Having this available for CI servers is fantastic
  • 1
    Amazing service to do cloud cross browser testing
  • 1
    Depth of integrations
  • 1
    Because of its cloud based support for appium
  • 1
    Easy setup, Works great with selenium.
  • 1
    QE support
  • 1
    Manuals are not very well versed for beginners
  • 1
    Secure testing
  • 1
    Cheaper than browserstack
  • 1
    Stable
  • 0
    Simple to set up and integrate so many browser configs
CONS OF SAUCE LABS
  • 2
    Relatively slow
  • 2
    Expensive

related Sauce Labs posts

Shared insights
on
Sauce LabsSauce LabsSeleniumSelenium

I am looking to purchase one of these tools for Mobile testing for my team. It should support Native, hybrid, and responsive app testing. It should also feature debugging, parallel execution, automation testing/easy integration with automation testing tools like Selenium, and the capability to provide availability of devices specifically for us to use at any time with good speed of performing all these activities.

I have already used Perfecto mobile, and Sauce Labs in my other projects before. I want to know how different or better is AWS Device farm in usage and how advantageous it would be for us to use it over other mentioned tools

See more
Zarema Khalilova
Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 293K views

I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

See more