Alternatives to QMetry logo

Alternatives to QMetry

Zephyr, FitNesse, Testrail, Selenium, and qTest Management are the most popular alternatives and competitors to QMetry.
16
34
+ 1
0

What is QMetry and what are its top alternatives?

It offers agile testing solutions for QA teams to automate testing. Use it to shorten software testing cycles
QMetry is a tool in the Test Management category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to QMetry

  • Zephyr
    Zephyr

    Manage all aspects of software quality; integrate with JIRA and various test tools, foster collaboration and gain real-time visibility. ...

  • FitNesse
    FitNesse

    It is an open source project. The code base is not owned by any company. A lot of information is shared by the FitNesse community. It's extremely adaptable and is used in areas ranging from Web/GUI tests to testing electronic components. ...

  • Testrail
    Testrail

    TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process. ...

  • Selenium
    Selenium

    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well. ...

  • qTest Management
    qTest Management

    It is a test management software used by the small as well as large-scale organization. It helps to create a centralize test management system for easy communication and rapid deployment of the task to QA teams and developers. ...

  • Cucumber
    Cucumber

    Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs. ...

  • Karma
    Karma

    Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like. ...

  • BrowserStack
    BrowserStack

    BrowserStack is a leading software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test their websites and mobile applications across 2,000+ real browsers and devices in a single cloud platform—and at scale. ...

QMetry alternatives & related posts

Zephyr logo

Zephyr

52
102
1
A real-time Test Management solution
52
102
+ 1
1
PROS OF ZEPHYR
  • 1
    Good integration with JIra
CONS OF ZEPHYR
  • 1
    Slow UI

related Zephyr posts

Shared insights
on
JiraJiraZephyrZephyrQMetryQMetry

could you please share any pros and cons of QMetry compared to Zephyr? The team is already using Jira and needs a tool for test management integrated into Jira. tks

See more
FitNesse logo

FitNesse

26
57
0
The fully integrated standalone wiki and acceptance testing framework
26
57
+ 1
0
PROS OF FITNESSE
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF FITNESSE
      Be the first to leave a con

      related FitNesse posts

      Testrail logo

      Testrail

      208
      253
      29
      Efficiently manage, track and organize your software testing efforts
      208
      253
      + 1
      29
      PROS OF TESTRAIL
      • 9
        Designed for testers
      • 6
        Easy to use
      • 5
        Easy Intergration
      • 5
        Intutive
      • 3
        Customer Support
      • 1
        Integration to jira
      CONS OF TESTRAIL
      • 4
        Pricey

      related Testrail posts

      Selenium logo

      Selenium

      14.7K
      11.5K
      523
      Web Browser Automation
      14.7K
      11.5K
      + 1
      523
      PROS OF SELENIUM
      • 173
        Automates browsers
      • 154
        Testing
      • 101
        Essential tool for running test automation
      • 24
        Record-Playback
      • 24
        Remote Control
      • 8
        Data crawling
      • 7
        Supports end to end testing
      • 6
        Functional testing
      • 6
        Easy set up
      • 4
        The Most flexible monitoring system
      • 3
        End to End Testing
      • 3
        Easy to integrate with build tools
      • 2
        Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
      • 2
        Record and playback
      • 2
        Compatible with Python
      • 2
        Easy to scale
      • 2
        Integration Tests
      • 0
        Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework
      CONS OF SELENIUM
      • 8
        Flaky tests
      • 4
        Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
      • 1
        Update browser drivers

      related Selenium posts

      Kamil Kowalski
      Lead Architect at Fresha · | 28 upvotes · 2M views

      When you think about test automation, it’s crucial to make it everyone’s responsibility (not just QA Engineers'). We started with Selenium and Java, but with our platform revolving around Ruby, Elixir and JavaScript, QA Engineers were left alone to automate tests. Cypress was the answer, as we could switch to JS and simply involve more people from day one. There's a downside too, as it meant testing on Chrome only, but that was "good enough" for us + if really needed we can always cover some specific cases in a different way.

      See more
      Benjamin Poon
      QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 1M views

      For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

      With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

      See more
      qTest Management logo

      qTest Management

      19
      37
      0
      A test management tool used for Project Management, Bug Tracking, and Test Management
      19
      37
      + 1
      0
      PROS OF QTEST MANAGEMENT
        Be the first to leave a pro
        CONS OF QTEST MANAGEMENT
          Be the first to leave a con

          related qTest Management posts

          Cucumber logo

          Cucumber

          1.3K
          895
          36
          Simple, human collaboration.
          1.3K
          895
          + 1
          36
          PROS OF CUCUMBER
          • 20
            Simple Syntax
          • 8
            Simple usage
          • 5
            Huge community
          • 3
            Nice report
          CONS OF CUCUMBER
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Cucumber posts

            Benjamin Poon
            QA Manager - Engineering at HBC Digital · | 8 upvotes · 1M views

            For our digital QA organization to support a complex hybrid monolith/microservice architecture, our team took on the lofty goal of building out a commonized UI test automation framework. One of the primary requisites included a technical minimalist threshold such that an engineer or analyst with fundamental knowledge of JavaScript could automate their tests with greater ease. Just to list a few: - Nightwatchjs - Selenium - Cucumber - GitHub - Go.CD - Docker - ExpressJS - React - PostgreSQL

            With this structure, we're able to combine the automation efforts of each team member into a centralized repository while also providing new relevant metrics to business owners.

            See more
            Sarah Elson
            Product Growth at LambdaTest · | 4 upvotes · 458.7K views

            @producthunt LambdaTest Selenium JavaScript Java Python PHP Cucumber TeamCity CircleCI With this new release of LambdaTest automation, you can run tests across an Online Selenium Grid of 2000+ browsers and OS combinations to perform cross browser testing. This saves you from the pain of maintaining the infrastructure and also saves you the licensing costs for browsers and operating systems. #testing #Seleniumgrid #Selenium #testautomation #automation #webdriver #producthunt hunted

            See more
            Karma logo

            Karma

            2.9K
            600
            181
            Spectacular Test Runner for JavaScript
            2.9K
            600
            + 1
            181
            PROS OF KARMA
            • 61
              Test Runner
            • 35
              Open source
            • 27
              Continuous Integration
            • 22
              Great for running tests
            • 18
              Test on Real Devices
            • 11
              Backed by google
            • 5
              Easy Debugging
            • 2
              Remote Control
            CONS OF KARMA
            • 1
              Slow, because tests are run in a real browser
            • 1
              Requires the use of hacks to find tests dynamically

            related Karma posts

            Sai Chaitanya Mankala
            Tech Lead at KIOT Innovations · | 6 upvotes · 227K views

            Protractor or Cypress for ionic-angular?

            We have a huge ionic-angular app with almost 100 pages and 10+ injectables. There are no tests written yet. Before we start, we need some suggestions about the framework. Would you suggest Cypress or Angular's Protractor with Jasmine / Karma for a heavy ionic app with Angular?

            See more

            Switched from Jasmine with Karma that come setup by Angular CLI to use Jest instead, since Jasmine and Karma were very finicky in my setup and had to be reconfigured frequently to run tests properly.

            Jest was also easier to integrate into my workflow with Visual Studio Code.

            See more
            BrowserStack logo

            BrowserStack

            2.7K
            2K
            435
            BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications
            2.7K
            2K
            + 1
            435
            PROS OF BROWSERSTACK
            • 131
              Multiple browsers
            • 71
              Ease of use
            • 60
              Real browsers
            • 40
              Ability to use it locally
            • 23
              Good price
            • 17
              Great web interface
            • 15
              IE support
            • 13
              Official mobile emulators
            • 12
              Cloud-based access
            • 11
              Instant access
            • 8
              Real mobile devices
            • 5
              Selenium compatible
            • 5
              Multiple Desktop OS
            • 4
              Can be used for Testing and E2E
            • 4
              Screenshots
            • 3
              Pre-installed developer tools
            • 3
              Video of test runs
            • 2
              Favourites
            • 2
              Webdriver compatible
            • 2
              Supports Manual, Functional and Visual Diff Testing
            • 2
              Many browsers
            • 1
              Cypress Compatible
            • 1
              Free for Open Source
            CONS OF BROWSERSTACK
            • 2
              Very limited choice of minor versions

            related BrowserStack posts

            Zarema Khalilova
            Frontend Team Lead at Uploadcare · | 6 upvotes · 246K views

            I am working on #OpenSource file uploader. The uploader is the widget that other developers embed in their apps. It should work well in different browsers and on different devices. BrowserStack and Sauce Labs help to achieve that. I can test the uploader in many varieties of browsers+OS only used my browser without virtual machines.

            See more