Alternatives to OpenLDAP logo

Alternatives to OpenLDAP

FreeIPA, Auth0, JSON Web Token, Amazon Cognito, and Keycloak are the most popular alternatives and competitors to OpenLDAP.
83
123
+ 1
0

What is OpenLDAP and what are its top alternatives?

It is a free, open-source implementation of the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol. Lightweight Directory Access is an application protocol that is used to crosscheck information on the server end.
OpenLDAP is a tool in the User Management and Authentication category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to OpenLDAP

  • FreeIPA
    FreeIPA

    FreeIPA is an integrated Identity and Authentication solution for Linux/UNIX networked environments. A FreeIPA server provides centralized authentication, authorization and account information by storing data about user, groups, hosts and other objects necessary to manage the security aspects of a network of computers. ...

  • Auth0
    Auth0

    A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications. ...

  • JSON Web Token
    JSON Web Token

    JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed. ...

  • Amazon Cognito
    Amazon Cognito

    You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline. ...

  • Keycloak
    Keycloak

    It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box. ...

  • OAuth2
    OAuth2

    It is an authorization framework that enables a third-party application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of a resource owner by orchestrating an approval interaction between the resource owner and the HTTP service, or by allowing the third-party application to obtain access on its own behalf. ...

  • Spring Security
    Spring Security

    It is a framework that focuses on providing both authentication and authorization to Java applications. The real power of Spring Security is found in how easily it can be extended to meet custom requirements. ...

  • Firebase Authentication
    Firebase Authentication

    It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google, ...

OpenLDAP alternatives & related posts

FreeIPA logo

FreeIPA

37
78
2
Manage Linux users and client hosts in your realm from one central location with CLI, Web UI or...
37
78
+ 1
2
PROS OF FREEIPA
  • 1
    Manages sudo command groups and sudo commands
  • 1
    Manages host and host groups
CONS OF FREEIPA
    Be the first to leave a con

    related FreeIPA posts

    Auth0 logo

    Auth0

    1.2K
    1.8K
    211
    Token-based Single Sign On for your Apps and APIs with social, databases and enterprise identities
    1.2K
    1.8K
    + 1
    211
    PROS OF AUTH0
    • 67
      JSON web token
    • 31
      Integration with 20+ Social Providers
    • 20
      It's a universal solution
    • 20
      SDKs
    • 14
      Amazing Documentation
    • 11
      Heroku Add-on
    • 8
      Enterprise support
    • 7
      Great Sample Repos
    • 7
      Extend platform with "rules"
    • 4
      Azure Add-on
    • 3
      Easy integration, non-intrusive identity provider
    • 3
      Passwordless
    • 2
      It can integrate seamlessly with firebase
    • 2
      Great documentation, samples, UX and Angular support
    • 2
      Polished
    • 2
      On-premise deployment
    • 1
      Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance
    • 1
      OpenID Connect (OIDC) Support
    • 1
      Active Directory support
    • 1
      MFA
    • 1
      SOC2
    • 1
      Great support
    • 1
      Springboot
    • 1
      SAML Support
    CONS OF AUTH0
    • 14
      Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
    • 7
      Poor support
    • 4
      Status page not reflect actual status
    • 3
      Rapidly changing API

    related Auth0 posts

    Stephen Gheysens
    Senior Solutions Engineer at Twilio · | 14 upvotes · 686.3K views

    Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

    My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

    See more

    Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

    See more
    JSON Web Token logo

    JSON Web Token

    949
    251
    0
    A JSON-based open standard for creating access tokens
    949
    251
    + 1
    0
    PROS OF JSON WEB TOKEN
      Be the first to leave a pro
      CONS OF JSON WEB TOKEN
        Be the first to leave a con

        related JSON Web Token posts

        Repost

        Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku . However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

        Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

        Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

        Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

        See more

        Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku. However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

        Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

        Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

        Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

        See more
        Amazon Cognito logo

        Amazon Cognito

        529
        801
        33
        Securely manage and synchronize app data for your users across their mobile devices
        529
        801
        + 1
        33
        PROS OF AMAZON COGNITO
        • 14
          Backed by Amazon
        • 7
          Manage Unique Identities
        • 3
          Work Offline
        • 3
          MFA
        • 2
          Store and Sync
        • 1
          It works
        • 1
          Integrate with Google, Amazon, Twitter, Facebook, SAML
        • 1
          SDKs and code samples
        • 1
          Free for first 50000 users
        CONS OF AMAZON COGNITO
        • 3
          Massive Pain to get working
        • 2
          Login-UI sparsely customizable (e.g. no translation)
        • 2
          Documentation often out of date
        • 1
          MFA: there is no "forget device" function
        • 1
          Hard to find expiration times for tokens/codes
        • 1
          Lacks many basic features
        • 1
          There is no "Logout" method in the API
        • 1
          No recovery codes for MFA
        • 1
          Difficult to customize (basic-pack is more than humble)
        • 1
          Only paid support
        • 1
          Docs are vast but mostly useless

        related Amazon Cognito posts

        I'm starting a new React Native project and trying to decide on an auth provider. Currently looking at Auth0 and Amazon Cognito. It will need to play nice with a Django Rest Framework backend.

        See more
        Keycloak logo

        Keycloak

        520
        1K
        77
        An open source identity and access management solution
        520
        1K
        + 1
        77
        PROS OF KEYCLOAK
        • 27
          It's a open source solution
        • 20
          Supports multiple identity provider
        • 13
          OpenID and SAML support
        • 8
          Easy customisation
        • 7
          JSON web token
        • 2
          Maintained by devs at Redhat
        CONS OF KEYCLOAK
        • 5
          Okta
        • 4
          Lack of Code examples for client side
        • 4
          Poor client side documentation

        related Keycloak posts

        Joshua Dean Küpper
        CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 7 upvotes · 437.1K views

        As the access to our global REST-API "Charon" is bound to OAuth2, we use Keycloak inside Quarkus to authenticate and authorize users of our API. It is not possible to perform any un-authenticated requests against this API, so we wanted to make really sure that the authentication/authorization component is absolutely reliable and tested. We found those attributes within Keycloak, so we used it.

        See more
        Shared insights
        on
        OktaOktaKeycloakKeycloak

        I want some good advice on which one I should prefer. (Keycloak or Okta) Since Keycloak is open source, it will be our first preference, but do we face some limitations with this approach? And since our product is SAAS based and we support the following authentications at present. 1. AT DB level 2. 3rd part IDP providers 3. LDAP/AD...

        See more
        OAuth2 logo

        OAuth2

        481
        514
        0
        An open standard for access delegation
        481
        514
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF OAUTH2
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF OAUTH2
            Be the first to leave a con

            related OAuth2 posts

            Joshua Dean Küpper
            CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 7 upvotes · 437.1K views

            As the access to our global REST-API "Charon" is bound to OAuth2, we use Keycloak inside Quarkus to authenticate and authorize users of our API. It is not possible to perform any un-authenticated requests against this API, so we wanted to make really sure that the authentication/authorization component is absolutely reliable and tested. We found those attributes within Keycloak, so we used it.

            See more
            Isaac Ogunleye
            Backend Developer at Coast research Institute · | 5 upvotes · 104.2K views
            Shared insights
            on
            PassportPassportOAuth2OAuth2

            My teammates and I are arguing on which library to use for our local and social authentication in our express app between OAuth2 and Passport. I went for Passport cause I personally like it, and it seems easier to implement with good docs, but some of my teammates think it's less secure than OAuth2. So any advice please would be appreciated. Thanks 🙏🏻

            See more
            Spring Security logo

            Spring Security

            457
            465
            5
            A powerful and highly customizable authentication and access-control framework
            457
            465
            + 1
            5
            PROS OF SPRING SECURITY
            • 3
              Java integration
            • 2
              Easy to use
            CONS OF SPRING SECURITY
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Spring Security posts

              Firebase Authentication logo

              Firebase Authentication

              434
              509
              52
              An App Authentication System In A Few Lines Of Code
              434
              509
              + 1
              52
              PROS OF FIREBASE AUTHENTICATION
              • 11
                Completely Free
              • 8
                Native App + Web integrations
              • 8
                Email/Password
              • 6
                Passwordless
              • 6
                Works seemlessly with other Firebase Services
              • 5
                Integration with OAuth Providers
              • 4
                Easy to Integrate and Manage
              • 4
                Anonymous Users
              CONS OF FIREBASE AUTHENTICATION
              • 3
                Heavy webpack

              related Firebase Authentication posts

              Stephen Gheysens
              Senior Solutions Engineer at Twilio · | 14 upvotes · 686.3K views

              Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

              My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

              See more

              Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

              See more