Alternatives to Nette Framework logo

Alternatives to Nette Framework

Yii, Laravel, CodeIgniter, Nette, and Node.js are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Nette Framework.
141
21
+ 1
15

What is Nette Framework and what are its top alternatives?

It is a set of decoupled and reusable PHP components that will make your work easier. You can use any of these components independently from the rest of framework. It lets you work more effectively, focus on what's important and makes your code more readable and well-structured in the process.
Nette Framework is a tool in the Frameworks (Full Stack) category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to Nette Framework

  • Yii
    Yii

    Yii comes with: MVC, DAO/ActiveRecord, I18N/L10N, caching, authentication and role-based access control, scaffolding, testing, etc. It can reduce your development time significantly. ...

  • Laravel
    Laravel

    It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching. ...

  • CodeIgniter
    CodeIgniter

    CodeIgniter is a proven, agile & open PHP web application framework with a small footprint. It is powering the next generation of web apps. ...

  • Nette
    Nette

    Lets you focus on the creative part of being a developer. It's built to be extremely usable, friendly and a joy to use. Its comprehensible yet efficient syntax, a cutting edge debugger and industry-leading security features let you write e-commerce sites, wikis, blogs, CMS or anything you can imagine faster and better than ever. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • Django
    Django

    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. ...

  • ASP.NET
    ASP.NET

    .NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications. ...

  • Android SDK
    Android SDK

    Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment. ...

Nette Framework alternatives & related posts

Yii logo

Yii

670
368
311
A high-performance PHP framework best for developing Web 2.0 applications
670
368
+ 1
311
PROS OF YII
  • 42
    Open source
  • 33
    Code generator
  • 33
    Simple
  • 29
    Active record
  • 26
    Full featured
  • 21
    Documentation
  • 21
    High performance
  • 20
    Rapid development
  • 16
    Flexible
  • 11
    Mvc
  • 10
    Not bloated
  • 8
    Stable Release
  • 8
    Community
  • 8
    Amazing
  • 7
    View Helpers
  • 6
    Modular architecture
  • 6
    Long Term Support
  • 5
    Easy setup, easy develop
  • 1
    Easy
CONS OF YII
  • 1
    Promotes spagetti code
  • 1
    Unnatural love of arrays
  • 1
    Too Opinionated
  • 1
    Promotes bad practice

related Yii posts

Buzz Zhang
Shared insights
on
PHPPHPYiiYiiMySQLMySQLPHP-MVCPHP-MVC

Of all PHP frameworks, my best and only choice is Yii . Think of this: you have a MySQL database, it contains several tables. Now you want to setup a PHP-MVC site, firstly, you must create Models, Yii have a very handy tool called Gii, you can easily create model with Gii just by one click, Gii will read your database table columns and create PHP models automatically for you. Now you need Controller, still with Gii, it will automatically create all 4 php files for you with Insert/Delete/Update/Select even with Search function.

Well, now the most modern way is to have a RESTful API, that's even easier with Yii, you even don't need to care about all the columns, just 4 lines of code you can expose your database table as RESTful API with all GET/POST/PUT/DELETE support, even you change your database table columns, you don't need to change any PHP code.

For security, Yii have embedded authentication and RBAC support. For multi language, Yii have embedded i18n support, all with out-of-box. Just play with it, I bet you will love it.

See more
Laravel logo

Laravel

24.8K
20.5K
3.7K
A PHP Framework For Web Artisans
24.8K
20.5K
+ 1
3.7K
PROS OF LARAVEL
  • 534
    Clean architecture
  • 382
    Growing community
  • 360
    Composer friendly
  • 331
    Open source
  • 311
    The only framework to consider for php
  • 214
    Mvc
  • 205
    Quickly develop
  • 164
    Dependency injection
  • 151
    Application architecture
  • 140
    Embraces good community packages
  • 69
    Write less, do more
  • 64
    Orm (eloquent)
  • 63
    Restful routing
  • 52
    Database migrations & seeds
  • 50
    Artisan scaffolding and migrations
  • 37
    Awesome
  • 37
    Great documentation
  • 28
    Awsome, Powerfull, Fast and Rapid
  • 26
    Build Apps faster, easier and better
  • 25
    Promotes elegant coding
  • 24
    Eloquent ORM
  • 23
    JSON friendly
  • 23
    Modern PHP
  • 22
    Easy to learn, scalability
  • 21
    Most easy for me
  • 21
    Beautiful
  • 21
    Blade Template
  • 20
    Test-Driven
  • 14
    Security
  • 14
    Based on SOLID
  • 12
    Easy to attach Middleware
  • 12
    Clean Documentation
  • 12
    Cool
  • 11
    Convention over Configuration
  • 11
    Simple
  • 10
    Easy Request Validatin
  • 9
    Easy to use
  • 9
    Fast
  • 9
    Simpler
  • 8
    Friendly API
  • 8
    Its just wow
  • 8
    Get going quickly straight out of the box. BYOKDM
  • 8
    Laravel + Cassandra = Killer Framework
  • 7
    Simplistic , easy and faster
  • 7
    Less dependencies
  • 7
    Super easy and powerful
  • 6
    Its beautiful to code in
  • 6
    Great customer support
  • 5
    Laravel Mix
  • 5
    Easy
  • 5
    The only "cons" is wrong! No static method just Facades
  • 5
    Fast and Clarify framework
  • 5
    Active Record
  • 5
    Php7
  • 5
    Speed
  • 5
    Minimum system requirements
  • 4
    Easy views handling and great ORM
  • 4
    Eloquent
  • 4
    Laragon
  • 4
    Composer
  • 3
    Laravel Passport
  • 3
    Intuitive usage
  • 3
    Ease of use
  • 3
    Cashier with Braintree and Stripe
  • 3
    Laravel Forge and Envoy
  • 3
    Laravel Horizon and Telescope
  • 3
    Laravel Spark
  • 3
    Laravel Nova
  • 3
    Laravel casher
  • 2
    Scout
  • 2
    Rapid development
  • 1
    Lovely
  • 1
    Deployment
  • 1
    Succint sintax
CONS OF LARAVEL
  • 48
    PHP
  • 31
    Too many dependency
  • 22
    Slower than the other two
  • 17
    A lot of static method calls for convenience
  • 15
    Too many include
  • 12
    Heavy
  • 8
    Bloated
  • 7
    Laravel
  • 6
    Confusing
  • 5
    Too underrated
  • 3
    Not fast with MongoDB
  • 1
    Difficult to learn
  • 1
    Not using SOLID principles

related Laravel posts

I need to build a web application plus android and IOS apps for an enterprise, like an e-commerce portal. It will have intensive use of MySQL to display thousands (40-50k) of live product information in an interactive table (searchable, filterable), live delivery tracking. It has to be secure, as it will handle information on customers, sales, inventory. Here is the technology stack: Backend: Laravel 7 Frondend: Vue.js, React or AngularJS?

Need help deciding technology stack. Thanks.

See more
Antonio Sanchez

Back at the start of 2017, we decided to create a web-based tool for the SEO OnPage analysis of our clients' websites. We had over 2.000 websites to analyze, so we had to perform thousands of requests to get every single page from those websites, process the information and save the big amounts of data somewhere.

Very soon we realized that the initial chosen script language and database, PHP, Laravel and MySQL, was not going to be able to cope efficiently with such a task.

By that time, we were doing some experiments for other projects with a language we had recently get to know, Go , so we decided to get a try and code the crawler using it. It was fantastic, we could process much more data with way less CPU power and in less time. By using the concurrency abilites that the language has to offers, we could also do more Http requests in less time.

Unfortunately, I have no comparison numbers to show about the performance differences between Go and PHP since the difference was so clear from the beginning and that we didn't feel the need to do further comparison tests nor document it. We just switched fully to Go.

There was still a problem: despite the big amount of Data we were generating, MySQL was performing very well, but as we were adding more and more features to the software and with those features more and more different type of data to save, it was a nightmare for the database architects to structure everything correctly on the database, so it was clear what we had to do next: switch to a NoSQL database. So we switched to MongoDB, and it was also fantastic: we were expending almost zero time in thinking how to structure the Database and the performance also seemed to be better, but again, I have no comparison numbers to show due to the lack of time.

We also decided to switch the website from PHP and Laravel to JavaScript and Node.js and ExpressJS since working with the JSON Data that we were saving now in the Database would be easier.

As of now, we don't only use the tool intern but we also opened it for everyone to use for free: https://tool-seo.com

See more
CodeIgniter logo

CodeIgniter

3.2K
1.5K
464
A Fully Baked PHP Framework
3.2K
1.5K
+ 1
464
PROS OF CODEIGNITER
  • 86
    Mvc
  • 76
    Easy setup
  • 70
    Open source
  • 62
    Well documented
  • 36
    Community support
  • 25
    Easy to learn
  • 21
    Easy
  • 14
    Fast
  • 11
    HMVC
  • 9
    Language Suppert
  • 9
    "Fast","Easy","MVC"
  • 7
    Powerful
  • 6
    Open source, Easy to setup
  • 6
    I think it is best. we can make all types of project
  • 6
    Easy, fast and full functional
  • 5
    Customizable
  • 5
    Beginner friendly framework
  • 4
    Super Lightweight, Super Easy to Learn
  • 3
    CLI
  • 2
    Easily Extensible
  • 1
    Powerful
CONS OF CODEIGNITER
  • 6
    No ORM
  • 1
    No CLI

related CodeIgniter posts

Michael Feldhake
Developer at Fleet-Nomics · | 7 upvotes · 10.3K views
Shared insights
on
CakePHPCakePHPCodeIgniterCodeIgniterBubbleBubble

Hi all, I need to create a simple IoT interface application that connects the end device API with a GeoTab API. I am considering using Bubble due to its simple interface and configuration tools, but I fear it's too simple. We will want to add features and new devices as we grow - I was thinking of using CodeIgniter or CakePHP on a hosted site for the application. Must support JCOM encoding between the two APIs and there is no need for a separate interface as GeoTab already has one; we are just connecting and pushing data. Thoughts?

See more
Saikat Chakrabortty
Shared insights
on
PHPPHPLaravelLaravelCodeIgniterCodeIgniter

I have used PHP to do end to end developments , using Laravel CodeIgniter frameworks.

See more
Nette logo

Nette

40
32
5
A family of mature and stand-alone components for PHP 7
40
32
+ 1
5
PROS OF NETTE
  • 1
    Robust templating system
  • 1
    Pure and safe OOP
  • 1
    Effective database layer
  • 1
    Simple to learn and understand
  • 1
    Has best tools for live performance testing
CONS OF NETTE
  • 1
    Too small english documentation

related Nette posts

Node.js logo

Node.js

163.4K
137.8K
8.5K
A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
163.4K
137.8K
+ 1
8.5K
PROS OF NODE.JS
  • 1.4K
    Npm
  • 1.3K
    Javascript
  • 1.1K
    Great libraries
  • 1K
    High-performance
  • 802
    Open source
  • 485
    Great for apis
  • 475
    Asynchronous
  • 420
    Great community
  • 390
    Great for realtime apps
  • 296
    Great for command line utilities
  • 82
    Websockets
  • 82
    Node Modules
  • 69
    Uber Simple
  • 59
    Great modularity
  • 58
    Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
  • 42
    Easy to start
  • 35
    Great for Data Streaming
  • 32
    Realtime
  • 28
    Awesome
  • 25
    Non blocking IO
  • 18
    Can be used as a proxy
  • 17
    High performance, open source, scalable
  • 16
    Non-blocking and modular
  • 15
    Easy and Fun
  • 14
    Easy and powerful
  • 13
    Same lang as AngularJS
  • 13
    Future of BackEnd
  • 12
    Fullstack
  • 11
    Fast
  • 10
    Cross platform
  • 10
    Scalability
  • 9
    Simple
  • 8
    Mean Stack
  • 7
    Great for webapps
  • 7
    Easy concurrency
  • 6
    Typescript
  • 6
    React
  • 6
    Fast, simple code and async
  • 6
    Friendly
  • 5
    Great speed
  • 5
    Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
  • 5
    Scalable
  • 5
    Its amazingly fast and scalable
  • 5
    Control everything
  • 5
    Fast development
  • 4
    Isomorphic coolness
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 4
    It's fast
  • 3
    Great community
  • 3
    Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
  • 3
    TypeScript Support
  • 3
    Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
  • 3
    Not Python
  • 3
    One language, end-to-end
  • 3
    Easy
  • 3
    Easy to learn
  • 3
    Less boilerplate code
  • 3
    Performant and fast prototyping
  • 3
    Blazing fast
  • 2
    Event Driven
  • 2
    Lovely
  • 2
    Npm i ape-updating
  • 1
    Creat for apis
  • 0
    Node
CONS OF NODE.JS
  • 46
    Bound to a single CPU
  • 44
    New framework every day
  • 38
    Lots of terrible examples on the internet
  • 31
    Asynchronous programming is the worst
  • 23
    Callback
  • 18
    Javascript
  • 11
    Dependency based on GitHub
  • 11
    Dependency hell
  • 10
    Low computational power
  • 7
    Very very Slow
  • 7
    Can block whole server easily
  • 6
    Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
  • 3
    Unneeded over complication
  • 3
    Unstable
  • 3
    Breaking updates
  • 2
    No standard approach
  • 1
    Bad transitive dependency management
  • 1
    Can't read server session

related Node.js posts

Nick Rockwell
SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 44 upvotes · 2.3M views

When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

See more
Conor Myhrvold
Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 41 upvotes · 5.7M views

How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

(GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

See more
Django logo

Django

33.4K
30.1K
4K
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
33.4K
30.1K
+ 1
4K
PROS OF DJANGO
  • 656
    Rapid development
  • 480
    Open source
  • 414
    Great community
  • 369
    Easy to learn
  • 270
    Mvc
  • 224
    Beautiful code
  • 216
    Elegant
  • 199
    Free
  • 196
    Great packages
  • 185
    Great libraries
  • 74
    Restful
  • 72
    Comes with auth and crud admin panel
  • 72
    Powerful
  • 69
    Great documentation
  • 64
    Great for web
  • 51
    Python
  • 39
    Great orm
  • 37
    Great for api
  • 28
    All included
  • 25
    Fast
  • 23
    Web Apps
  • 20
    Used by top startups
  • 20
    Clean
  • 19
    Easy setup
  • 17
    Sexy
  • 14
    Convention over configuration
  • 13
    Allows for very rapid development with great libraries
  • 13
    ORM
  • 12
    The Django community
  • 10
    King of backend world
  • 9
    Great MVC and templating engine
  • 8
    Full stack
  • 7
    Batteries included
  • 7
    Its elegant and practical
  • 6
    Have not found anything that it can't do
  • 6
    Very quick to get something up and running
  • 6
    Cross-Platform
  • 6
    Fast prototyping
  • 6
    Mvt
  • 5
    Zero code burden to change databases
  • 5
    Easy to develop end to end AI Models
  • 5
    Easy Structure , useful inbuilt library
  • 4
    Great peformance
  • 4
    Python community
  • 4
    Map
  • 4
    Easy
  • 4
    Many libraries
  • 4
    Modular
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Easy to change database manager
  • 3
    Just the right level of abstraction
  • 3
    Scaffold
  • 3
    Full-Text Search
  • 1
    Scalable
  • 1
    Node js
  • 0
    Rails
  • 0
    Fastapi
CONS OF DJANGO
  • 25
    Underpowered templating
  • 22
    Autoreload restarts whole server
  • 21
    Underpowered ORM
  • 15
    URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
  • 10
    Internal subcomponents coupling
  • 8
    Not nodejs
  • 7
    Admin
  • 7
    Configuration hell
  • 5
    Not as clean and nice documentation like Laravel
  • 3
    Bloated admin panel included
  • 3
    Python
  • 3
    Not typed
  • 2
    InEffective Multithreading
  • 2
    Overwhelming folder structure

related Django posts

Dmitry Mukhin

Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It’s worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren’t running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we’d go with Ember.js.

However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

See more

Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

See more
ASP.NET logo

ASP.NET

25.4K
9.7K
35
An open source web framework for building modern web apps and services with .NET
25.4K
9.7K
+ 1
35
PROS OF ASP.NET
  • 19
    Great mvc
  • 11
    Easy to learn
  • 5
    C#
CONS OF ASP.NET
  • 1
    C#
  • 1
    Entity framework is very slow
  • 1
    Not highly flexible for advance Developers

related ASP.NET posts

Greg Neumann
Indie, Solo, Developer · | 8 upvotes · 1M views

Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

See more
Shared insights
on
ASP.NETASP.NETPostgreSQLPostgreSQLLaravelLaravel

I am looking for a new framework to learn and achieve more efficient development. I come mainly from Laravel, which greatly simplifies development, but is somewhat slow for the volumes of data that I usually handle (although very stable) and it falls far behind in terms of simultaneous connections.

I'm looking for something that responds well to high concurrency, adapts well to server resources (cores) without the need to be concerned about consciously multi-threading or similar things, has a good ORM and friendly integration with PostgreSQL, request validation, And of course, it is scalable.

The main use would be for API development and behind the scenes processing of large volumes of data (50M on average, although this goes hand in hand with the database and server capacity)..

The last framework I would include but couldn't is ASP.NET MVC.

See more
Android SDK logo

Android SDK

23.8K
18.5K
795
An SDK that provides you the API libraries and developer tools necessary to build, test, and debug apps...
23.8K
18.5K
+ 1
795
PROS OF ANDROID SDK
  • 286
    Android development
  • 155
    Necessary for android
  • 127
    Android studio
  • 86
    Mobile framework
  • 82
    Backed by google
  • 27
    Platform-tools
  • 21
    Eclipse + adt plugin
  • 5
    Powerful, simple, one stop environment
  • 3
    Free
  • 3
    Больно
CONS OF ANDROID SDK
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Android SDK posts

    Jesus Dario Rivera Rubio
    Telecomm Engineering at Netbeast · | 10 upvotes · 939.9K views

    We are using React Native in #SmartHome to share the business logic between Android and iOS team and approach users with a unique brand experience. The drawback is that we require lots of native Android SDK and Objective-C modules, so a good part of the invested time is there. The gain for a app that relies less on native communication, sensors and OS tools should be even higher.

    Also it helps us set different testing stages: we use Travis CI for the javascript (business logic), Bitrise to run build tests and @Detox for #end2end automated user tests.

    We use a microservices structure on top of Zeit's @now that read from firebase. We use JWT auth to authenticate requests among services and from users, following GitHub philosophy of using the same infrastructure than its API consumers. Firebase is used mainly as a key-value store between services and as a backup database for users. We also use its authentication mechanisms.

    You can be super locked-in if you also rely on it's analytics, but we use Amplitude for that, which offers us great insights. Intercom for communications with end-user and Mailjet for marketing.

    See more
    Sezgi Ulucam
    Developer Advocate at Hasura · | 7 upvotes · 818.6K views

    I've recently switched to using Expo for initializing and developing my React Native apps. Compared to React Native CLI, it's so much easier to get set up and going. Setting up and maintaining Android Studio, Android SDK, and virtual devices used to be such a headache. Thanks to Expo, I can now test my apps directly on my Android phone, just by installing the Expo app. I still use Xcode Simulator for iOS testing, since I don't have an iPhone, but that's easy anyway. The big win for me with Expo is ease of Android testing.

    The Expo SDK also provides convenient features like Facebook login, MapView, push notifications, and many others. https://docs.expo.io/versions/v31.0.0/sdk/

    See more