Alternatives to k6 logo

Alternatives to k6

Locust, Gatling, Wrk, Apache JMeter, and AWS Device Farm are the most popular alternatives and competitors to k6.
177
197
+ 1
50

What is k6 and what are its top alternatives?

It is a developer centric open source load testing tool for testing the performance of your backend infrastructure. It’s built with Go and JavaScript to integrate well into your development workflow.
k6 is a tool in the Load and Performance Testing category of a tech stack.
k6 is an open source tool with GitHub stars and GitHub forks. Here’s a link to k6's open source repository on GitHub

Top Alternatives to k6

  • Locust
    Locust

    Locust is an easy-to-use, distributed, user load testing tool. Intended for load testing web sites (or other systems) and figuring out how many concurrent users a system can handle. ...

  • Gatling
    Gatling

    Gatling is a highly capable load testing tool. It is designed for ease of use, maintainability and high performance. Out of the box, Gatling comes with excellent support of the HTTP protocol that makes it a tool of choice for load testing any HTTP server. As the core engine is actually protocol agnostic, it is perfectly possible to implement support for other protocols. For example, Gatling currently also ships JMS support. ...

  • Wrk
    Wrk

    It is a hiring platform that provides an affordable way for small businesses to get a handle on their hiring process—a seamless set of features to create custom job posts and application forms, manage incoming candidates, and document the entire journey. ...

  • Apache JMeter
    Apache JMeter

    It is open source software, a 100% pure Java application designed to load test functional behavior and measure performance. It was originally designed for testing Web Applications but has since expanded to other test functions. ...

  • AWS Device Farm
    AWS Device Farm

    Run tests across a large selection of physical devices in parallel from various manufacturers with varying hardware, OS versions and form factors. ...

  • Loader.io
    Loader.io

    Loader.io is a free load testing service that allows you to stress test your web-apps/apis with thousands of concurrent connections. ...

  • BlazeMeter
    BlazeMeter

    Simulate any user scenario for webapps, websites, mobile apps or web services. 100% Apache JMeter compatible. Scalable from 1 to 1,000,000+ concurrent users.<br> ...

  • Flood IO
    Flood IO

    Performance testing with Flood increases customer satisfaction and confidence in your production apps and reduces business risk. ...

k6 alternatives & related posts

Locust logo

Locust

163
300
50
Define user behaviour with Python code, and swarm your system with millions of simultaneous users
163
300
+ 1
50
PROS OF LOCUST
  • 14
    Hackable
  • 11
    Supports distributed
  • 7
    Open source
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 6
    Easy to setup
  • 4
    Fast
  • 2
    Test Anything
CONS OF LOCUST
  • 1
    Bad design

related Locust posts

Shared insights
on
LocustLocustGatlingGatlingJenkinsJenkins

I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

See more
Vrashab Jian
Shared insights
on
Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

See more
Gatling logo

Gatling

241
306
21
Open-source load testing for DevOps and CI/CD
241
306
+ 1
21
PROS OF GATLING
  • 6
    Great detailed reports
  • 5
    Loadrunner
  • 5
    Can run in cluster mode
  • 3
    Scala based
  • 2
    Load test as code
CONS OF GATLING
  • 2
    Steep Learning Curve
  • 1
    Hard to test non-supported protocols
  • 0
    Not distributed

related Gatling posts

Shared insights
on
LocustLocustGatlingGatlingJenkinsJenkins

I am looking for a performance testing tool that I can use for testing the documents accessed by many users simultaneously. I also want to integrate Jenkins with the performance automation tool. I am not able to decide which shall I choose Gatling or Locust. But for me, Jenkins integration is important. I am looking for suggestions for this scenario.

See more
Vrashab Jian
Shared insights
on
Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

See more
Wrk logo

Wrk

5
10
0
A simple and affordable way to hire
5
10
+ 1
0
PROS OF WRK
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF WRK
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Wrk posts

      Apache JMeter logo

      Apache JMeter

      385
      261
      10
      An open source load testing tool
      385
      261
      + 1
      10
      PROS OF APACHE JMETER
      • 5
        Requires no programming knowledge
      • 3
        Supports distributed
      • 2
        Open-source
      CONS OF APACHE JMETER
      • 1
        It's GUI-first
      • 1
        Too complicated

      related Apache JMeter posts

      AWS Device Farm logo

      AWS Device Farm

      75
      173
      5
      Test your app on real devices in the AWS Cloud
      75
      173
      + 1
      5
      PROS OF AWS DEVICE FARM
      • 3
        1000 free minutes
      • 2
        Pay as you go pricing
      CONS OF AWS DEVICE FARM
      • 1
        Records all sessions, blocks on processing when done
      • 1
        You need to remember to turn airplane mode off

      related AWS Device Farm posts

      Loader.io logo

      Loader.io

      72
      172
      18
      Simple Cloud-based Load Testing
      72
      172
      + 1
      18
      PROS OF LOADER.IO
      • 9
        Easy to use
      • 6
        Free tier
      • 3
        Heroku add-on
      CONS OF LOADER.IO
        Be the first to leave a con

        related Loader.io posts

        BlazeMeter logo

        BlazeMeter

        64
        151
        13
        The Load Testing Platform for Developers
        64
        151
        + 1
        13
        PROS OF BLAZEMETER
        • 10
          I can run load tests without needing JMeter scripts.
        • 3
          Easy to prepare JMeter workers
        CONS OF BLAZEMETER
        • 1
          Costly
        • 1
          UI centric

        related BlazeMeter posts

        Flood IO logo

        Flood IO

        20
        68
        5
        Where scalable software starts
        20
        68
        + 1
        5
        PROS OF FLOOD IO
        • 2
          Great feature set
        • 2
          Affordable
        • 1
          Easy to use
        CONS OF FLOOD IO
          Be the first to leave a con

          related Flood IO posts

          Vrashab Jian
          Shared insights
          on
          Flood IOFlood IOLocustLocustGatlingGatling

          I have to run a multi-user load test and have test scripts developed in Gatling and Locust.

          I am planning to run the tests with Flood IO, as it allows us to create a custom grid. They support Gatling. Did anyone try Locust tests? I would prefer not to use multiple infra providers for running these tests!

          See more