Alternatives to JumpCloud logo

Alternatives to JumpCloud

Foxpass, OneLogin, Okta, Centrify, and Auth0 are the most popular alternatives and competitors to JumpCloud.
23
24
+ 1
0

What is JumpCloud and what are its top alternatives?

It is a Colorado-based startup that customers use to authenticate, authorize, and manage users, devices, and applications. They do it all easily via a common directory in the cloud, instead of through legacy, on-premises IT systems.
JumpCloud is a tool in the User Management and Authentication category of a tech stack.

Top Alternatives to JumpCloud

  • Foxpass
    Foxpass

    Helps technology companies improve their infrastructure security with its SaaS-based SSH-key hosting, LDAP, and RADIUS products. These services make it easy to have per-user logins to Linux machines, VPNs, and WiFi networks. ...

  • OneLogin
    OneLogin

    OneLogin provides a cloud-based identity and access management (IAM) solution that offers simple single sign-on (SSO), making it easier for companies to secure and manage access to web applications both in the cloud and behind the firewall. ...

  • Okta
    Okta

    Connect all your apps in days, not months, with instant access to thousands of pre-built integrations - even add apps to the network yourself. Integrations are easy to set up, constantly monitored, proactively repaired and handle authentication and provisioning. ...

  • Centrify
    Centrify

    It is privileged identity management and identity as a service solutions stop the breach by securing access to hybrid enterprises through the power of identity services. ...

  • Auth0
    Auth0

    A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications. ...

  • Duo
    Duo

    Duo is a next-generation package manager that blends the best ideas from Component, Browserify and Go to make organizing and writing front-end code quick and painless. ...

  • JSON Web Token
    JSON Web Token

    JSON Web Token is an open standard that defines a compact and self-contained way for securely transmitting information between parties as a JSON object. This information can be verified and trusted because it is digitally signed. ...

  • Keycloak
    Keycloak

    It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box. ...

JumpCloud alternatives & related posts

Foxpass logo

Foxpass

2
10
0
Automated Server and Network Access
2
10
+ 1
0
PROS OF FOXPASS
    Be the first to leave a pro
    CONS OF FOXPASS
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Foxpass posts

      OneLogin logo

      OneLogin

      92
      180
      6
      On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more
      92
      180
      + 1
      6
      PROS OF ONELOGIN
      • 2
        SAML
      • 1
        Great Customer Support
      • 1
        Easy setup
      • 1
        REST API
      • 1
        Directory synchronization
      CONS OF ONELOGIN
        Be the first to leave a con

        related OneLogin posts

        Okta logo

        Okta

        389
        792
        61
        Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices
        389
        792
        + 1
        61
        PROS OF OKTA
        • 14
          REST API
        • 9
          SAML
        • 5
          OIDC OpenID Connect
        • 5
          User Provisioning
        • 5
          Easy LDAP integration
        • 4
          Universal Directory
        • 4
          API Access Management - oAuth2 as a service
        • 4
          Protect B2E, B2B, B2C apps
        • 3
          SSO, MFA for cloud, on-prem, custom apps
        • 3
          Easy Active Directory integration
        • 3
          Tons of Identity Management features
        • 1
          SWA applications Integration
        • 1
          SOC2
        • 0
          Test
        CONS OF OKTA
        • 4
          Pricing is too high
        • 1
          Okta verify (Multi-factor Authentication)

        related Okta posts

        Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

        See more
        Micha Mailänder
        CEO & Co-Founder at Dechea · | 4 upvotes · 65.4K views
        Shared insights
        on
        FaunaFaunaMongoDBMongoDBOktaOktaAuth0Auth0
        at

        If these three are your options, I would recommend going with Auth0. They have all functionality available as developer API (Okta e.g. not) so you can manage your instance with Infrastructure as code and can also easily add functionalities relatively easily with the API. They are also really powerful if we're talking about ABAC (Attribute based access control). You can also enrich your access token with custom claims from your MongoDB, that can be probably really useful, as you said that you're dealing with multi tenancy.

        We're using Auth0 in combination with Fauna Fauna is a database, so it would challenge you're mongodb. But Faunadb is the first database that implemented a full end user ABAC system directly in the database. (And also a lot easier than the ABAC systems from Okta or Auth0). This helps us, to use Auth0 only as identity platform and doing all the authorization with enriched claims over Fauna. With that you can skip in a lot of the cases you're backend, and you can request directly from the frontend your database (Blazing fast). Also, you can replace in some years Auth0 a lot easier with some upcoming cheaper (Auth0 was bought by Okta for a hilarious price) and "easy to use" passwordless identity provider like Passage.id

        See more
        Centrify logo

        Centrify

        13
        31
        0
        Leader in securing enterprise identities against cyberthreats that target today’s hybrid IT environment of cloud, mobile and on-premises
        13
        31
        + 1
        0
        PROS OF CENTRIFY
          Be the first to leave a pro
          CONS OF CENTRIFY
            Be the first to leave a con

            related Centrify posts

            Auth0 logo

            Auth0

            1.3K
            2K
            215
            Token-based Single Sign On for your Apps and APIs with social, databases and enterprise identities
            1.3K
            2K
            + 1
            215
            PROS OF AUTH0
            • 70
              JSON web token
            • 31
              Integration with 20+ Social Providers
            • 20
              SDKs
            • 20
              It's a universal solution
            • 15
              Amazing Documentation
            • 11
              Heroku Add-on
            • 8
              Enterprise support
            • 7
              Extend platform with "rules"
            • 7
              Great Sample Repos
            • 4
              Azure Add-on
            • 3
              Easy integration, non-intrusive identity provider
            • 3
              Passwordless
            • 2
              It can integrate seamlessly with firebase
            • 2
              Great documentation, samples, UX and Angular support
            • 2
              Polished
            • 2
              On-premise deployment
            • 1
              Will sign BAA for HIPAA-compliance
            • 1
              MFA
            • 1
              Active Directory support
            • 1
              Springboot
            • 1
              SOC2
            • 1
              SAML Support
            • 1
              Great support
            • 1
              OpenID Connect (OIDC) Support
            CONS OF AUTH0
            • 14
              Pricing too high (Developer Pro)
            • 7
              Poor support
            • 4
              Status page not reflect actual status
            • 3
              Rapidly changing API

            related Auth0 posts

            Stephen Gheysens
            Lead Solutions Engineer at Inscribe · | 14 upvotes · 1.2M views

            Hi Otensia! I'd definitely recommend using the skills you've already got and building with JavaScript is a smart way to go these days. Most platform services have JavaScript/Node SDKs or NPM packages, many serverless platforms support Node in case you need to write any backend logic, and JavaScript is incredibly popular - meaning it will be easy to hire for, should you ever need to.

            My advice would be "don't reinvent the wheel". If you already have a skill set that will work well to solve the problem at hand, and you don't need it for any other projects, don't spend the time jumping into a new language. If you're looking for an excuse to learn something new, it would be better to invest that time in learning a new platform/tool that compliments your knowledge of JavaScript. For this project, I might recommend using Netlify, Vercel, or Google Firebase to quickly and easily deploy your web app. If you need to add user authentication, there are great examples out there for Firebase Authentication, Auth0, or even Magic (a newcomer on the Auth scene, but very user friendly). All of these services work very well with a JavaScript-based application.

            See more

            Hey all, We're currently weighing up the pros & cons of using Firebase Authentication vs something more OTB like Auth0 or Okta to manage end-user access management for a consumer digital content product. From what I understand so far, Something like Firebase Auth would require more dev effort but is likely to cost less overall, whereas OTB, you have a UI-based console which makes config by non-technical business users easier to manage. Does anyone else have any intuitions or experiences they could share on this, please? Thank you!

            See more
            Duo logo

            Duo

            19
            41
            1
            A next-generation package manager for the front end
            19
            41
            + 1
            1
            PROS OF DUO
            • 1
              Lean and efficient
            CONS OF DUO
              Be the first to leave a con

              related Duo posts

              JSON Web Token logo

              JSON Web Token

              1.7K
              311
              0
              A JSON-based open standard for creating access tokens
              1.7K
              311
              + 1
              0
              PROS OF JSON WEB TOKEN
                Be the first to leave a pro
                CONS OF JSON WEB TOKEN
                  Be the first to leave a con

                  related JSON Web Token posts

                  Repost

                  Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku . However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

                  Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

                  Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

                  Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

                  See more

                  Overview: To put it simply, we plan to use the MERN stack to build our web application. MongoDB will be used as our primary database. We will use ExpressJS alongside Node.js to set up our API endpoints. Additionally, we plan to use React to build our SPA on the client side and use Redis on the server side as our primary caching solution. Initially, while working on the project, we plan to deploy our server and client both on Heroku. However, Heroku is very limited and we will need the benefits of an Infrastructure as a Service so we will use Amazon EC2 to later deploy our final version of the application.

                  Serverside: nodemon will allow us to automatically restart a running instance of our node app when files changes take place. We decided to use MongoDB because it is a non relational database which uses the Document Object Model. This allows a lot of flexibility as compared to a RDMS like SQL which requires a very structural model of data that does not change too much. Another strength of MongoDB is its ease in scalability. We will use Mongoose along side MongoDB to model our application data. Additionally, we will host our MongoDB cluster remotely on MongoDB Atlas. Bcrypt will be used to encrypt user passwords that will be stored in the DB. This is to avoid the risks of storing plain text passwords. Moreover, we will use Cloudinary to store images uploaded by the user. We will also use the Twilio SendGrid API to enable automated emails sent by our application. To protect private API endpoints, we will use JSON Web Token and Passport. Also, PayPal will be used as a payment gateway to accept payments from users.

                  Client Side: As mentioned earlier, we will use React to build our SPA. React uses a virtual DOM which is very efficient in rendering a page. Also React will allow us to reuse components. Furthermore, it is very popular and there is a large community that uses React so it can be helpful if we run into issues. We also plan to make a cross platform mobile application later and using React will allow us to reuse a lot of our code with React Native. Redux will be used to manage state. Redux works great with React and will help us manage a global state in the app and avoid the complications of each component having its own state. Additionally, we will use Bootstrap components and custom CSS to style our app.

                  Other: Git will be used for version control. During the later stages of our project, we will use Google Analytics to collect useful data regarding user interactions. Moreover, Slack will be our primary communication tool. Also, we will use Visual Studio Code as our primary code editor because it is very light weight and has a wide variety of extensions that will boost productivity. Postman will be used to interact with and debug our API endpoints.

                  See more
                  Keycloak logo

                  Keycloak

                  631
                  1.2K
                  96
                  An open source identity and access management solution
                  631
                  1.2K
                  + 1
                  96
                  PROS OF KEYCLOAK
                  • 32
                    It's a open source solution
                  • 23
                    Supports multiple identity provider
                  • 16
                    OpenID and SAML support
                  • 11
                    Easy customisation
                  • 9
                    JSON web token
                  • 5
                    Maintained by devs at Redhat
                  CONS OF KEYCLOAK
                  • 7
                    Okta
                  • 6
                    Poor client side documentation
                  • 5
                    Lack of Code examples for client side

                  related Keycloak posts

                  Shared insights
                  on
                  OktaOktaKeycloakKeycloakGitHubGitHub

                  Hello,

                  I'm trying to implement a solution for this situation:

                  There is a restaurant in which users can access RestAPI, using Google, Facebook, GitHub. There is even the possibility to login inside using the SPID authentication. In the first case I was considering Keycloak as a better solution for this case, but then i've read about Okta and its pros.

                  I cannot understand reading and searching on Google if SPID authentication is supported by OKTA. Looks like to be, because it should be using SAML, but I haven't found a clear solution.

                  See more
                  Joshua Dean Küpper
                  CEO at Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) · | 7 upvotes · 709.2K views

                  As the access to our global REST-API "Charon" is bound to OAuth2, we use Keycloak inside Quarkus to authenticate and authorize users of our API. It is not possible to perform any un-authenticated requests against this API, so we wanted to make really sure that the authentication/authorization component is absolutely reliable and tested. We found those attributes within Keycloak, so we used it.

                  See more