Alternatives to Grizzly logo

Alternatives to Grizzly

Buffalo, Node.js, Django, ASP.NET, and Laravel are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Grizzly.
8
15
+ 1
0

What is Grizzly and what are its top alternatives?

Grizzly is a high-performance, low-latency framework for building scalable web applications in Java. Key features of Grizzly include HTTP and WebSocket support, asynchronous I/O, and integration with various Java EE technologies. However, some limitations of Grizzly include complex configuration setup and a steep learning curve for beginners.

  1. Netty: Netty is a high-performance networking framework for building server and client applications in Java. Key features include asynchronous event-driven architecture, support for various protocols, and a wide range of integrations. Pros of Netty compared to Grizzly include a large active community and extensive documentation, while a potential con could be a steeper learning curve.

  2. Undertow: Undertow is a lightweight and flexible web server written in Java. Key features include non-blocking I/O, easy embedding in applications, and seamless integration with Java EE technologies. Pros of Undertow compared to Grizzly include simplicity and ease of use, while a potential con could be less customization options.

  3. Vert.x: Vert.x is a toolkit for building reactive applications on the JVM with polyglot language support. Key features include event-driven architecture, asynchronous programming model, and built-in support for various protocols. Pros of Vert.x compared to Grizzly include a wide range of modules for different use cases, while a potential con could be a more complex setup process.

  4. Tomcat: Apache Tomcat is an open-source web server and servlet container for Java applications. Key features include support for the Servlet API, JSP, and WebSocket protocols. Pros of Tomcat compared to Grizzly include widespread adoption and compatibility with various Java technologies, while a potential con could be lower performance in some use cases.

  5. Jetty: Jetty is a lightweight and high-performance HTTP server and servlet container written in Java. Key features include support for the Servlet API, WebSocket, and HTTP/2 protocols. Pros of Jetty compared to Grizzly include a modular architecture and strong performance, while a potential con could be less extensive documentation.

  6. Spring Boot: Spring Boot is a popular framework for building Java web applications with a focus on simplicity and convention over configuration. Key features include auto-configuration, embedded servers, and a wide range of integrations. Pros of Spring Boot compared to Grizzly include rapid development and easy setup, while a potential con could be less fine-grained control over configurations.

  7. Dropwizard: Dropwizard is a Java framework for building RESTful web services with an emphasis on production-ready applications. Key features include metrics, health checks, and configuration management. Pros of Dropwizard compared to Grizzly include integrated tools for monitoring and managing applications, while a potential con could be a more opinionated approach to application structure.

  8. Ratpack: Ratpack is a lightweight and reactive web framework for building Java applications. Key features include asynchronous and non-blocking I/O, Groovy DSL, and seamless integration with Java technologies. Pros of Ratpack compared to Grizzly include high performance and simplicity, while a potential con could be a smaller community and fewer resources.

  9. Play Framework: Play Framework is a web application framework for Java and Scala focused on developer productivity and modern web development practices. Key features include hot reloading, asynchronous programming, and integration with popular development tools. Pros of Play Framework compared to Grizzly include rapid development and extensive documentation, while a potential con could be a more opinionated approach to application architecture.

  10. Ktor: Ktor is a web framework for building asynchronous servers and clients in Kotlin. Key features include a lightweight footprint, coroutine-based programming model, and extensible architecture. Pros of Ktor compared to Grizzly include native support for Kotlin language features and interoperability with Java, while a potential con could be a smaller community and less extensive ecosystem.

Top Alternatives to Grizzly

  • Buffalo
    Buffalo

    Buffalo is Go web framework. Yeah, I hate the word "framework" too! Buffalo is different though. Buffalo doesn't want to re-invent wheels like routing and templating. Buffalo is glue that wraps all of the best packages available and makes them all play nicely together. ...

  • Node.js
    Node.js

    Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices. ...

  • Django
    Django

    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. ...

  • ASP.NET
    ASP.NET

    .NET is a developer platform made up of tools, programming languages, and libraries for building many different types of applications. ...

  • Laravel
    Laravel

    It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching. ...

  • Android SDK
    Android SDK

    Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment. ...

  • Spring Boot
    Spring Boot

    Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration. ...

  • Rails
    Rails

    Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern. ...

Grizzly alternatives & related posts

Buffalo logo

Buffalo

13
50
5
MVC Web Framework for Go
13
50
+ 1
5
PROS OF BUFFALO
  • 4
    Go
  • 1
    Friendly Api
CONS OF BUFFALO
    Be the first to leave a con

    related Buffalo posts

    Node.js logo

    Node.js

    183.7K
    155.9K
    8.5K
    A platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications
    183.7K
    155.9K
    + 1
    8.5K
    PROS OF NODE.JS
    • 1.4K
      Npm
    • 1.3K
      Javascript
    • 1.1K
      Great libraries
    • 1K
      High-performance
    • 805
      Open source
    • 486
      Great for apis
    • 477
      Asynchronous
    • 423
      Great community
    • 390
      Great for realtime apps
    • 296
      Great for command line utilities
    • 84
      Websockets
    • 83
      Node Modules
    • 69
      Uber Simple
    • 59
      Great modularity
    • 58
      Allows us to reuse code in the frontend
    • 42
      Easy to start
    • 35
      Great for Data Streaming
    • 32
      Realtime
    • 28
      Awesome
    • 25
      Non blocking IO
    • 18
      Can be used as a proxy
    • 17
      High performance, open source, scalable
    • 16
      Non-blocking and modular
    • 15
      Easy and Fun
    • 14
      Easy and powerful
    • 13
      Future of BackEnd
    • 13
      Same lang as AngularJS
    • 12
      Fullstack
    • 11
      Fast
    • 10
      Scalability
    • 10
      Cross platform
    • 9
      Simple
    • 8
      Mean Stack
    • 7
      Great for webapps
    • 7
      Easy concurrency
    • 6
      Typescript
    • 6
      Fast, simple code and async
    • 6
      React
    • 6
      Friendly
    • 5
      Control everything
    • 5
      Its amazingly fast and scalable
    • 5
      Easy to use and fast and goes well with JSONdb's
    • 5
      Scalable
    • 5
      Great speed
    • 5
      Fast development
    • 4
      It's fast
    • 4
      Easy to use
    • 4
      Isomorphic coolness
    • 3
      Great community
    • 3
      Not Python
    • 3
      Sooper easy for the Backend connectivity
    • 3
      TypeScript Support
    • 3
      Blazing fast
    • 3
      Performant and fast prototyping
    • 3
      Easy to learn
    • 3
      Easy
    • 3
      Scales, fast, simple, great community, npm, express
    • 3
      One language, end-to-end
    • 3
      Less boilerplate code
    • 2
      Npm i ape-updating
    • 2
      Event Driven
    • 2
      Lovely
    • 1
      Creat for apis
    • 0
      Node
    CONS OF NODE.JS
    • 46
      Bound to a single CPU
    • 45
      New framework every day
    • 40
      Lots of terrible examples on the internet
    • 33
      Asynchronous programming is the worst
    • 24
      Callback
    • 19
      Javascript
    • 11
      Dependency based on GitHub
    • 11
      Dependency hell
    • 10
      Low computational power
    • 7
      Can block whole server easily
    • 7
      Callback functions may not fire on expected sequence
    • 7
      Very very Slow
    • 4
      Breaking updates
    • 4
      Unstable
    • 3
      No standard approach
    • 3
      Unneeded over complication
    • 1
      Can't read server session
    • 1
      Bad transitive dependency management

    related Node.js posts

    Nick Rockwell
    SVP, Engineering at Fastly · | 46 upvotes · 3.2M views

    When I joined NYT there was already broad dissatisfaction with the LAMP (Linux Apache HTTP Server MySQL PHP) Stack and the front end framework, in particular. So, I wasn't passing judgment on it. I mean, LAMP's fine, you can do good work in LAMP. It's a little dated at this point, but it's not ... I didn't want to rip it out for its own sake, but everyone else was like, "We don't like this, it's really inflexible." And I remember from being outside the company when that was called MIT FIVE when it had launched. And been observing it from the outside, and I was like, you guys took so long to do that and you did it so carefully, and yet you're not happy with your decisions. Why is that? That was more the impetus. If we're going to do this again, how are we going to do it in a way that we're gonna get a better result?

    So we're moving quickly away from LAMP, I would say. So, right now, the new front end is React based and using Apollo. And we've been in a long, protracted, gradual rollout of the core experiences.

    React is now talking to GraphQL as a primary API. There's a Node.js back end, to the front end, which is mainly for server-side rendering, as well.

    Behind there, the main repository for the GraphQL server is a big table repository, that we call Bodega because it's a convenience store. And that reads off of a Kafka pipeline.

    See more
    Conor Myhrvold
    Tech Brand Mgr, Office of CTO at Uber · | 44 upvotes · 9.6M views

    How Uber developed the open source, end-to-end distributed tracing Jaeger , now a CNCF project:

    Distributed tracing is quickly becoming a must-have component in the tools that organizations use to monitor their complex, microservice-based architectures. At Uber, our open source distributed tracing system Jaeger saw large-scale internal adoption throughout 2016, integrated into hundreds of microservices and now recording thousands of traces every second.

    Here is the story of how we got here, from investigating off-the-shelf solutions like Zipkin, to why we switched from pull to push architecture, and how distributed tracing will continue to evolve:

    https://eng.uber.com/distributed-tracing/

    (GitHub Pages : https://www.jaegertracing.io/, GitHub: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger)

    Bindings/Operator: Python Java Node.js Go C++ Kubernetes JavaScript OpenShift C# Apache Spark

    See more
    Django logo

    Django

    36.8K
    33.3K
    4.2K
    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines
    36.8K
    33.3K
    + 1
    4.2K
    PROS OF DJANGO
    • 670
      Rapid development
    • 487
      Open source
    • 424
      Great community
    • 379
      Easy to learn
    • 276
      Mvc
    • 232
      Beautiful code
    • 223
      Elegant
    • 206
      Free
    • 203
      Great packages
    • 194
      Great libraries
    • 79
      Restful
    • 79
      Comes with auth and crud admin panel
    • 78
      Powerful
    • 75
      Great documentation
    • 71
      Great for web
    • 57
      Python
    • 43
      Great orm
    • 41
      Great for api
    • 32
      All included
    • 28
      Fast
    • 25
      Web Apps
    • 23
      Easy setup
    • 23
      Clean
    • 21
      Used by top startups
    • 19
      Sexy
    • 19
      ORM
    • 15
      The Django community
    • 14
      Allows for very rapid development with great libraries
    • 14
      Convention over configuration
    • 11
      King of backend world
    • 10
      Full stack
    • 10
      Great MVC and templating engine
    • 8
      Fast prototyping
    • 8
      Mvt
    • 7
      Easy to develop end to end AI Models
    • 7
      Batteries included
    • 7
      Its elegant and practical
    • 6
      Have not found anything that it can't do
    • 6
      Very quick to get something up and running
    • 6
      Cross-Platform
    • 5
      Easy Structure , useful inbuilt library
    • 5
      Great peformance
    • 5
      Zero code burden to change databases
    • 5
      Python community
    • 4
      Map
    • 4
      Just the right level of abstraction
    • 4
      Easy to change database manager
    • 4
      Modular
    • 4
      Many libraries
    • 4
      Easy to use
    • 4
      Easy
    • 4
      Full-Text Search
    • 3
      Scaffold
    • 1
      Fastapi
    • 1
      Built in common security
    • 1
      Scalable
    • 1
      Great default admin panel
    • 1
      Node js
    • 1
      Gigante ta
    • 0
      Rails
    CONS OF DJANGO
    • 26
      Underpowered templating
    • 22
      Autoreload restarts whole server
    • 22
      Underpowered ORM
    • 15
      URL dispatcher ignores HTTP method
    • 10
      Internal subcomponents coupling
    • 8
      Not nodejs
    • 8
      Configuration hell
    • 7
      Admin
    • 5
      Not as clean and nice documentation like Laravel
    • 4
      Python
    • 3
      Not typed
    • 3
      Bloated admin panel included
    • 2
      Overwhelming folder structure
    • 2
      InEffective Multithreading
    • 1
      Not type safe

    related Django posts

    Dmitry Mukhin
    Engineer at Uploadcare · | 25 upvotes · 2.4M views

    Simple controls over complex technologies, as we put it, wouldn't be possible without neat UIs for our user areas including start page, dashboard, settings, and docs.

    Initially, there was Django. Back in 2011, considering our Python-centric approach, that was the best choice. Later, we realized we needed to iterate on our website more quickly. And this led us to detaching Django from our front end. That was when we decided to build an SPA.

    For building user interfaces, we're currently using React as it provided the fastest rendering back when we were building our toolkit. It’s worth mentioning Uploadcare is not a front-end-focused SPA: we aren’t running at high levels of complexity. If it were, we’d go with Ember.js.

    However, there's a chance we will shift to the faster Preact, with its motto of using as little code as possible, and because it makes more use of browser APIs. One of our future tasks for our front end is to configure our Webpack bundler to split up the code for different site sections. For styles, we use PostCSS along with its plugins such as cssnano which minifies all the code.

    All that allows us to provide a great user experience and quickly implement changes where they are needed with as little code as possible.

    See more

    Hey, so I developed a basic application with Python. But to use it, you need a python interpreter. I want to add a GUI to make it more appealing. What should I choose to develop a GUI? I have very basic skills in front end development (CSS, JavaScript). I am fluent in python. I'm looking for a tool that is easy to use and doesn't require too much code knowledge. I have recently tried out Flask, but it is kinda complicated. Should I stick with it, move to Django, or is there another nice framework to use?

    See more
    ASP.NET logo

    ASP.NET

    28.1K
    11.3K
    40
    An open source web framework for building modern web apps and services with .NET
    28.1K
    11.3K
    + 1
    40
    PROS OF ASP.NET
    • 21
      Great mvc
    • 13
      Easy to learn
    • 6
      C#
    CONS OF ASP.NET
    • 2
      Entity framework is very slow
    • 1
      C#
    • 1
      Not highly flexible for advance Developers

    related ASP.NET posts

    Greg Neumann
    Indie, Solo, Developer · | 8 upvotes · 1.4M views

    Finding the most effective dev stack for a solo developer. Over the past year, I've been looking at many tech stacks that would be 'best' for me, as a solo, indie, developer to deliver a desktop app (Windows & Mac) plus mobile - iOS mainly. Initially, Xamarin started to stand-out. Using .NET Core as the run-time, Xamarin as the native API provider and Xamarin Forms for the UI seemed to solve all issues. But, the cracks soon started to appear. Xamarin Forms is mobile only; the Windows incarnation is different. There is no Mac UI solution (you have to code it natively in Mac OS Storyboard. I was also worried how Xamarin Forms , if I was to use it, was going to cope, in future, with Apple's new SwiftUI and Google's new Fuchsia.

    This plethora of techs for the UI-layer made me reach for the safer waters of using Web-techs for the UI. Lovely! Consistency everywhere (well, mostly). But that consistency evaporates when platform issues are addressed. There are so many web frameworks!

    But, I made a simple decision. It's just me...I am clever, but there is no army of coders here. And I have big plans for a business app. How could just 1 developer go-on to deploy a decent app to Windows, iPhone, iPad & Mac OS? I remembered earlier days when I've used Microsoft's ASP.NET to scaffold - generate - loads of Code for a web-app that I needed for several charities that I worked with. What 'generators' exist that do a lot of the platform-specific rubbish, allow the necessary customisation of such platform integration and provide a decent UI?

    I've placed my colours to the Quasar Framework mast. Oh dear, that means Electron desktop apps doesn't it? Well, Ive had enough of loads of Developers saying that "the menus won't look native" or "it uses too much RAM" and so on. I've been using non-native UI-wrapped apps for ages - the date picker in Outlook on iOS is way better than the native date-picker and I'd been using it for years without getting hot under the collar about it. Developers do get so hung-up on things that busy Users hardly notice; don't you think?. As to the RAM usage issue; that's a bit true. But Users only really notice when an app uses so much RAM that the machine starts to page-out. Electron contributes towards that horizon but does not cause it. My Users will be business-users after all. Somewhat decent machines.

    Looking forward to all that lovely Vue.js around my TypeScript and all those really, really, b e a u t I f u l UI controls of Quasar Framework . Still not sure that 1 dev can deliver all that... but I'm up for trying...

    See more
    Shared insights
    on
    ASP.NETASP.NETPostgreSQLPostgreSQLLaravelLaravel

    I am looking for a new framework to learn and achieve more efficient development. I come mainly from Laravel, which greatly simplifies development, but is somewhat slow for the volumes of data that I usually handle (although very stable) and it falls far behind in terms of simultaneous connections.

    I'm looking for something that responds well to high concurrency, adapts well to server resources (cores) without the need to be concerned about consciously multi-threading or similar things, has a good ORM and friendly integration with PostgreSQL, request validation, And of course, it is scalable.

    The main use would be for API development and behind the scenes processing of large volumes of data (50M on average, although this goes hand in hand with the database and server capacity)..

    The last framework I would include but couldn't is ASP.NET MVC.

    See more
    Laravel logo

    Laravel

    27.4K
    22.8K
    3.9K
    A PHP Framework For Web Artisans
    27.4K
    22.8K
    + 1
    3.9K
    PROS OF LARAVEL
    • 553
      Clean architecture
    • 392
      Growing community
    • 370
      Composer friendly
    • 344
      Open source
    • 324
      The only framework to consider for php
    • 220
      Mvc
    • 210
      Quickly develop
    • 168
      Dependency injection
    • 156
      Application architecture
    • 143
      Embraces good community packages
    • 73
      Write less, do more
    • 71
      Orm (eloquent)
    • 66
      Restful routing
    • 57
      Database migrations & seeds
    • 55
      Artisan scaffolding and migrations
    • 41
      Great documentation
    • 40
      Awesome
    • 30
      Awsome, Powerfull, Fast and Rapid
    • 29
      Build Apps faster, easier and better
    • 28
      Eloquent ORM
    • 26
      Promotes elegant coding
    • 26
      Modern PHP
    • 26
      JSON friendly
    • 25
      Most easy for me
    • 24
      Easy to learn, scalability
    • 23
      Beautiful
    • 22
      Blade Template
    • 21
      Test-Driven
    • 15
      Security
    • 15
      Based on SOLID
    • 13
      Clean Documentation
    • 13
      Easy to attach Middleware
    • 13
      Cool
    • 12
      Simple
    • 12
      Convention over Configuration
    • 11
      Easy Request Validatin
    • 10
      Simpler
    • 10
      Fast
    • 10
      Easy to use
    • 9
      Get going quickly straight out of the box. BYOKDM
    • 9
      Its just wow
    • 8
      Laravel + Cassandra = Killer Framework
    • 8
      Simplistic , easy and faster
    • 8
      Friendly API
    • 7
      Less dependencies
    • 7
      Super easy and powerful
    • 6
      Great customer support
    • 6
      Its beautiful to code in
    • 5
      Speed
    • 5
      Eloquent
    • 5
      Composer
    • 5
      Minimum system requirements
    • 5
      Laravel Mix
    • 5
      Easy
    • 5
      The only "cons" is wrong! No static method just Facades
    • 5
      Fast and Clarify framework
    • 5
      Active Record
    • 5
      Php7
    • 4
      Ease of use
    • 4
      Laragon
    • 4
      Laravel casher
    • 4
      Easy views handling and great ORM
    • 4
      Laravel Forge and Envoy
    • 4
      Cashier with Braintree and Stripe
    • 3
      Laravel Passport
    • 3
      Laravel Spark
    • 3
      Intuitive usage
    • 3
      Laravel Horizon and Telescope
    • 3
      Laravel Nova
    • 3
      Rapid development
    • 2
      Laravel Vite
    • 2
      Scout
    • 2
      Deployment
    • 1
      Succint sintax
    CONS OF LARAVEL
    • 53
      PHP
    • 33
      Too many dependency
    • 23
      Slower than the other two
    • 17
      A lot of static method calls for convenience
    • 15
      Too many include
    • 13
      Heavy
    • 9
      Bloated
    • 8
      Laravel
    • 7
      Confusing
    • 5
      Too underrated
    • 4
      Not fast with MongoDB
    • 1
      Not using SOLID principles
    • 1
      Slow and too much big
    • 1
      Difficult to learn

    related Laravel posts

    I need to build a web application plus android and IOS apps for an enterprise, like an e-commerce portal. It will have intensive use of MySQL to display thousands (40-50k) of live product information in an interactive table (searchable, filterable), live delivery tracking. It has to be secure, as it will handle information on customers, sales, inventory. Here is the technology stack: Backend: Laravel 7 Frondend: Vue.js, React or AngularJS?

    Need help deciding technology stack. Thanks.

    See more
    Antonio Sanchez

    Back at the start of 2017, we decided to create a web-based tool for the SEO OnPage analysis of our clients' websites. We had over 2.000 websites to analyze, so we had to perform thousands of requests to get every single page from those websites, process the information and save the big amounts of data somewhere.

    Very soon we realized that the initial chosen script language and database, PHP, Laravel and MySQL, was not going to be able to cope efficiently with such a task.

    By that time, we were doing some experiments for other projects with a language we had recently get to know, Go , so we decided to get a try and code the crawler using it. It was fantastic, we could process much more data with way less CPU power and in less time. By using the concurrency abilites that the language has to offers, we could also do more Http requests in less time.

    Unfortunately, I have no comparison numbers to show about the performance differences between Go and PHP since the difference was so clear from the beginning and that we didn't feel the need to do further comparison tests nor document it. We just switched fully to Go.

    There was still a problem: despite the big amount of Data we were generating, MySQL was performing very well, but as we were adding more and more features to the software and with those features more and more different type of data to save, it was a nightmare for the database architects to structure everything correctly on the database, so it was clear what we had to do next: switch to a NoSQL database. So we switched to MongoDB, and it was also fantastic: we were expending almost zero time in thinking how to structure the Database and the performance also seemed to be better, but again, I have no comparison numbers to show due to the lack of time.

    We also decided to switch the website from PHP and Laravel to JavaScript and Node.js and ExpressJS since working with the JSON Data that we were saving now in the Database would be easier.

    As of now, we don't only use the tool intern but we also opened it for everyone to use for free: https://tool-seo.com

    See more
    Android SDK logo

    Android SDK

    26.4K
    20.2K
    799
    An SDK that provides you the API libraries and developer tools necessary to build, test, and debug apps...
    26.4K
    20.2K
    + 1
    799
    PROS OF ANDROID SDK
    • 289
      Android development
    • 155
      Necessary for android
    • 128
      Android studio
    • 86
      Mobile framework
    • 82
      Backed by google
    • 27
      Platform-tools
    • 21
      Eclipse + adt plugin
    • 5
      Powerful, simple, one stop environment
    • 3
      Free
    • 3
      Больно
    CONS OF ANDROID SDK
      Be the first to leave a con

      related Android SDK posts

      Jesus Dario Rivera Rubio
      Telecomm Engineering at Netbeast · | 10 upvotes · 1M views

      We are using React Native in #SmartHome to share the business logic between Android and iOS team and approach users with a unique brand experience. The drawback is that we require lots of native Android SDK and Objective-C modules, so a good part of the invested time is there. The gain for a app that relies less on native communication, sensors and OS tools should be even higher.

      Also it helps us set different testing stages: we use Travis CI for the javascript (business logic), Bitrise to run build tests and @Detox for #end2end automated user tests.

      We use a microservices structure on top of Zeit's @now that read from firebase. We use JWT auth to authenticate requests among services and from users, following GitHub philosophy of using the same infrastructure than its API consumers. Firebase is used mainly as a key-value store between services and as a backup database for users. We also use its authentication mechanisms.

      You can be super locked-in if you also rely on it's analytics, but we use Amplitude for that, which offers us great insights. Intercom for communications with end-user and Mailjet for marketing.

      See more
      Sezgi Ulucam
      Developer Advocate at Hasura · | 7 upvotes · 923.4K views

      I've recently switched to using Expo for initializing and developing my React Native apps. Compared to React Native CLI, it's so much easier to get set up and going. Setting up and maintaining Android Studio, Android SDK, and virtual devices used to be such a headache. Thanks to Expo, I can now test my apps directly on my Android phone, just by installing the Expo app. I still use Xcode Simulator for iOS testing, since I don't have an iPhone, but that's easy anyway. The big win for me with Expo is ease of Android testing.

      The Expo SDK also provides convenient features like Facebook login, MapView, push notifications, and many others. https://docs.expo.io/versions/v31.0.0/sdk/

      See more
      Spring Boot logo

      Spring Boot

      25.3K
      23K
      1K
      Create Spring-powered, production-grade applications and services with absolute minimum fuss
      25.3K
      23K
      + 1
      1K
      PROS OF SPRING BOOT
      • 149
        Powerful and handy
      • 134
        Easy setup
      • 128
        Java
      • 90
        Spring
      • 85
        Fast
      • 46
        Extensible
      • 37
        Lots of "off the shelf" functionalities
      • 32
        Cloud Solid
      • 26
        Caches well
      • 24
        Productive
      • 24
        Many receipes around for obscure features
      • 23
        Modular
      • 23
        Integrations with most other Java frameworks
      • 22
        Spring ecosystem is great
      • 21
        Auto-configuration
      • 21
        Fast Performance With Microservices
      • 18
        Community
      • 17
        Easy setup, Community Support, Solid for ERP apps
      • 15
        One-stop shop
      • 14
        Easy to parallelize
      • 14
        Cross-platform
      • 13
        Easy setup, good for build erp systems, well documented
      • 13
        Powerful 3rd party libraries and frameworks
      • 12
        Easy setup, Git Integration
      • 5
        It's so easier to start a project on spring
      • 4
        Kotlin
      • 1
        Microservice and Reactive Programming
      • 1
        The ability to integrate with the open source ecosystem
      CONS OF SPRING BOOT
      • 23
        Heavy weight
      • 18
        Annotation ceremony
      • 13
        Java
      • 11
        Many config files needed
      • 5
        Reactive
      • 4
        Excellent tools for cloud hosting, since 5.x
      • 1
        Java 😒😒

      related Spring Boot posts

      Praveen Mooli
      Engineering Manager at Taylor and Francis · | 18 upvotes · 3.8M views

      We are in the process of building a modern content platform to deliver our content through various channels. We decided to go with Microservices architecture as we wanted scale. Microservice architecture style is an approach to developing an application as a suite of small independently deployable services built around specific business capabilities. You can gain modularity, extensive parallelism and cost-effective scaling by deploying services across many distributed servers. Microservices modularity facilitates independent updates/deployments, and helps to avoid single point of failure, which can help prevent large-scale outages. We also decided to use Event Driven Architecture pattern which is a popular distributed asynchronous architecture pattern used to produce highly scalable applications. The event-driven architecture is made up of highly decoupled, single-purpose event processing components that asynchronously receive and process events.

      To build our #Backend capabilities we decided to use the following: 1. #Microservices - Java with Spring Boot , Node.js with ExpressJS and Python with Flask 2. #Eventsourcingframework - Amazon Kinesis , Amazon Kinesis Firehose , Amazon SNS , Amazon SQS, AWS Lambda 3. #Data - Amazon RDS , Amazon DynamoDB , Amazon S3 , MongoDB Atlas

      To build #Webapps we decided to use Angular 2 with RxJS

      #Devops - GitHub , Travis CI , Terraform , Docker , Serverless

      See more

      Is learning Spring and Spring Boot for web apps back-end development is still relevant in 2021? Feel free to share your views with comparison to Django/Node.js/ ExpressJS or other frameworks.

      Please share some good beginner resources to start learning about spring/spring boot framework to build the web apps.

      See more
      Rails logo

      Rails

      19.2K
      13.4K
      5.4K
      Web development that doesn't hurt
      19.2K
      13.4K
      + 1
      5.4K
      PROS OF RAILS
      • 856
        Rapid development
      • 652
        Great gems
      • 606
        Great community
      • 484
        Convention over configuration
      • 417
        Mvc
      • 348
        Great for web
      • 343
        Beautiful code
      • 310
        Open source
      • 270
        Great libraries
      • 261
        Active record
      • 108
        Elegant
      • 90
        Easy to learn
      • 88
        Easy Database Migrations
      • 82
        Makes you happy
      • 75
        Free
      • 62
        Great routing
      • 54
        Has everything you need to get the job done
      • 41
        Great Data Modeling
      • 38
        MVC - Easy to start on
      • 38
        Beautiful
      • 35
        Easy setup
      • 26
        Great caching
      • 25
        Ultra rapid development time
      • 22
        It's super easy
      • 17
        Great Resources
      • 16
        Easy to build mockups that work
      • 14
        Less Boilerplate
      • 7
        Developer Friendly
      • 7
        API Development
      • 6
        Great documentation
      • 5
        Easy REST API creation
      • 5
        Quick
      • 4
        Intuitive
      • 4
        Great language
      • 4
        Haml and sass
      • 4
        Easy to learn, use, improvise and update
      • 2
        Metaprogramming
      • 2
        It works
      • 2
        Jet packs come standard
      • 2
        Easy and fast
      • 2
        Legacy
      • 1
        It's intuitive
      • 1
        Convention over configuration
      • 1
        Easy Testing
      • 1
        Cancan
      CONS OF RAILS
      • 24
        Too much "magic" (hidden behavior)
      • 14
        Poor raw performance
      • 12
        Asset system is too primitive and outdated
      • 6
        Heavy use of mixins
      • 6
        Bloat in models
      • 4
        Very Very slow

      related Rails posts

      Zach Holman

      Oof. I have truly hated JavaScript for a long time. Like, for over twenty years now. Like, since the Clinton administration. It's always been a nightmare to deal with all of the aspects of that silly language.

      But wowza, things have changed. Tooling is just way, way better. I'm primarily web-oriented, and using React and Apollo together the past few years really opened my eyes to building rich apps. And I deeply apologize for using the phrase rich apps; I don't think I've ever said such Enterprisey words before.

      But yeah, things are different now. I still love Rails, and still use it for a lot of apps I build. But it's that silly rich apps phrase that's the problem. Users have way more comprehensive expectations than they did even five years ago, and the JS community does a good job at building tools and tech that tackle the problems of making heavy, complicated UI and frontend work.

      Obviously there's a lot of things happening here, so just saying "JavaScript isn't terrible" might encompass a huge amount of libraries and frameworks. But if you're like me, yeah, give things another shot- I'm somehow not hating on JavaScript anymore and... gulp... I kinda love it.

      See more
      Russel Werner
      Lead Engineer at StackShare · | 32 upvotes · 1.9M views

      StackShare Feed is built entirely with React, Glamorous, and Apollo. One of our objectives with the public launch of the Feed was to enable a Server-side rendered (SSR) experience for our organic search traffic. When you visit the StackShare Feed, and you aren't logged in, you are delivered the Trending feed experience. We use an in-house Node.js rendering microservice to generate this HTML. This microservice needs to run and serve requests independent of our Rails web app. Up until recently, we had a mono-repo with our Rails and React code living happily together and all served from the same web process. In order to deploy our SSR app into a Heroku environment, we needed to split out our front-end application into a separate repo in GitHub. The driving factor in this decision was mostly due to limitations imposed by Heroku specifically with how processes can't communicate with each other. A new SSR app was created in Heroku and linked directly to the frontend repo so it stays in-sync with changes.

      Related to this, we need a way to "deploy" our frontend changes to various server environments without building & releasing the entire Ruby application. We built a hybrid Amazon S3 Amazon CloudFront solution to host our Webpack bundles. A new CircleCI script builds the bundles and uploads them to S3. The final step in our rollout is to update some keys in Redis so our Rails app knows which bundles to serve. The result of these efforts were significant. Our frontend team now moves independently of our backend team, our build & release process takes only a few minutes, we are now using an edge CDN to serve JS assets, and we have pre-rendered React pages!

      #StackDecisionsLaunch #SSR #Microservices #FrontEndRepoSplit

      See more